| Taxi Driver Online http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/ |
|
| No change in Norwich as expected. http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=7330 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | JD [ Wed Nov 14, 2007 4:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | No change in Norwich as expected. |
Norwich say no change to LTI monopoly. As expected but how come this outfit who specialise in providing disabled transport don't have an LTI vehicle on their books? http://www.adaptedcarhire.co.uk/Website ... tegoryId=0 Regards JD |
|
| Author: | Sussex [ Wed Nov 14, 2007 4:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: No change in Norwich as expected. |
JD wrote: As expected but how come this outfit who specialise in providing disabled transport don't have an LTI vehicle on their books?
http://www.adaptedcarhire.co.uk/Website ... tegoryId=0 I can think of 35,000 reasons. 
|
|
| Author: | jimbo [ Wed Nov 14, 2007 6:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: No change in Norwich as expected. |
JD wrote: Norwich say no change to LTI monopoly.
As expected but how come this outfit who specialise in providing disabled transport don't have an LTI vehicle on their books? http://www.adaptedcarhire.co.uk/Website ... tegoryId=0 Regards JD Why would they? They aren't public hire. And LTI don't have a monopoly in Norwich. |
|
| Author: | JD [ Wed Nov 14, 2007 6:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: No change in Norwich as expected. |
jimbo wrote: JD wrote: Norwich say no change to LTI monopoly. As expected but how come this outfit who specialise in providing disabled transport don't have an LTI vehicle on their books? http://www.adaptedcarhire.co.uk/Website ... tegoryId=0 Regards JD Why would they? They aren't public hire. And LTI don't have a monopoly in Norwich. Because the report from the Spinal injuries association said nothing but LTI would do for them. Yet all these disabled people travel around in anything but LTI vehicles and no one in country even advocates that LTI vehicles be used for private use. So how about we give the disabled what they prefer to use in their private life? Regards JD |
|
| Author: | skippy41 [ Wed Nov 14, 2007 7:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Well if the drivers and the council are totally incensed on using LTI only, let them learn the hard way, when they change over to the TX4 and find out they will be off the road more than on it, and once the warranty has run out the owners will be left to pick up the bills |
|
| Author: | jimbo [ Thu Nov 15, 2007 10:43 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: No change in Norwich as expected. |
JD wrote: jimbo wrote: JD wrote: Norwich say no change to LTI monopoly. As expected but how come this outfit who specialise in providing disabled transport don't have an LTI vehicle on their books? http://www.adaptedcarhire.co.uk/Website ... tegoryId=0 Regards JD Why would they? They aren't public hire. And LTI don't have a monopoly in Norwich. Because the report from the Spinal injuries association said nothing but LTI would do for them. Yet all these disabled people travel around in anything but LTI vehicles and no one in country even advocates that LTI vehicles be used for private use. So how about we give the disabled what they prefer to use in their private life? Regards JD What, prostitutes? |
|
| Author: | JD [ Thu Nov 15, 2007 12:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: No change in Norwich as expected. |
jimbo wrote: What, prostitutes?
You have a long memory, I forgot about that? lol Regards JD |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|