Taxi Driver Online
http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/

Council say boy can't share sister's taxi to school
http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=7570
Page 1 of 1

Author:  JD [ Tue Dec 25, 2007 3:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Council say boy can't share sister's taxi to school

Leicester Mercury

December 24, 2007 Monday

Boy can't share sister's council taxi to school

County council bosses have refused to allow a teenager to travel to school in a taxi with his sister - even though they go to the same place.


Fourteen-year-old Alex Archer has cycled three-and-a-half miles to Countesthorpe Community College every day for three years.

His sister, Sianta, 12, suffers from epilepsy and is taken to nearby Leysland High School, also in Countesthorpe, in a taxi paid for by Leicestershire County Council.

However, transport chiefs will not let Alex jump in the spare seat unless he pays a £140 annual fare.

Despite repeated appeals by mum Melanie, from Enderby, the council will not budge on the issue. The pair go to schools outside their catchment area for legal reasons, but Alex does not qualify for free travel.

Mrs Archer is registered disabled and is unable to drive the two to school.

She said: "It's just ridiculous.

"There's a taxi going from my front door to his school with his sister in it and they won't let him use it.

"The taxi company is happy to take him at no extra cost to the council, but needs its permission for insurance reasons.

"But the council won't do it unless we pay them £140.

"He is a young carer for his sister, so if she had a fit on the way he'd be the one helping her. But they said he has to find his own way there."

Alex said the bike ride leaves him too tired for school.

He said: "I cycle there and back but I'm left shattered. I can't think in lessons.

"The teachers started to bring me in because I was so tired, but it is right out of their way."

A county council spokesman said: "Sianta is provided with transport on exceptional grounds.

"The county council would not wish to make the individual circumstances public when exceptional transport is agreed, as these are private matters.

"On the basis of this provision there is no reason to provide a carer, as the council would have provided an escort if required.

"However, a further risk assessment will be carried out to check the current arrangements.

"In this particular circumstance a spare place exists on the taxi and a fare-paying place is being offered for the remainder of the academic year for Alex, an option provided on many school contracts across the county."
___________________

Author:  Sussex [ Tue Dec 25, 2007 3:34 pm ]
Post subject: 

Welcome to the world of Councils know best. ](*,)

Author:  gusmac [ Tue Dec 25, 2007 3:53 pm ]
Post subject: 

Typical council thinking. Won't let common sense get in the way of a policy :roll:

Author:  echo15 [ Tue Dec 25, 2007 8:09 pm ]
Post subject: 

So where is the insurance problem?

Author:  Sussex [ Tue Dec 25, 2007 11:13 pm ]
Post subject: 

echo15 wrote:
So where is the insurance problem?

There is none, but the council might have a rule (contract not licensing) that that child needs to travel alone.

As has been said, the council is acting the tit.

Author:  Tulsablue [ Wed Dec 26, 2007 10:40 am ]
Post subject: 

Maybe the council are worried that they may find themselves offering a "right" to be carried to the brother which could then have contractual problems in the future, :doubt: not just with this individual case but with other similar ones. I.E. " the taxi goes right past the school door, why can't they take him/her etc. :-k
Sometimes things are just not as simple as they first appear. :?

Author:  grandad [ Wed Dec 26, 2007 11:01 am ]
Post subject: 

We used to transport 2 girls to the same school and they lived next door to each other but it had to be seperate cars. When the girls were on a work placement, they could both use the same car. :?

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/