Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Thu Apr 30, 2026 6:49 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Mar 05, 2008 6:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Dad's anger over unlicensed taxi driver on school run

A FATHER from Grays has spoken of his anger at Thurrock Council who allowed his daughter to be transported to school in the mini-bus driven by an unlicensed driver.

The Council has now sacked Ladycars UK, the transport firm used to take Daniel Reynolds' daughter to Castledon special needs school in Wickford.

Mr Reynolds, 45, of Crammavil Street says that he knew something was wrong on the first day a Ladycars driver turned up to take his 14-year-old step-daughter, who has autism, to school.

He and his wife Penny noticed that the driver did not have a taxi license displayed, and when they questioned her about it they were told that it had been applied for and was in the post.

Mr Reynolds said: "We smelt a rat so my wife rang up Transport for London who told us that if the taxi firm were registered in Thurrock then they should have a big green badge. They didn't have them and every time we asked where it was they said 'it's in the post, it's coming'."

When this same excuse kept being given on subsequent trips with different drivers, the worried parents contacted Thurrock Council several times, to be told each time that the firm had been checked out and that they shouldn't worry.

Last week, several months after he voiced his concerns, Mr Reynolds received a phone call from Thurrock Council informing him that after a random spot check was carried out, a driver from the firm had been found to have only ever been licensed to drive a vehicle with less than eight seats.

The council's contract with Ladycars has now been removed.

Mr Reynolds added: "It was always a different driver and a different chaperone who turned up. A driver once pulled up in her pyjamas, another time a driver turned up with bloodshot eyes and appeared to be drunk.

"Whenever we rang the council and they said don't trouble yourself, its all bona fide. Every time I spoke to them they told me it was all above board.

"We knew we were being told nonsense."

Ladycars UK, the all-female Leyton based cab firm, became a council-approved operator in September 2007, taking over from Thurrock firm Tilbury Taxis on the Castledon school run.

Thurrock Council maintain that at the time of awarding the contract to the company the operator and the drivers were properly checked out.

But Mr Reynolds is angry that the contract was ever awarded to a non-Thurrock firm in the first place.

He said: "I want to know why on earth this firm, from Leyton was transporting our children around anyway? I'm appalled. Why not a Thurrock firm?

"They took my daughter out of the mini-bus of a tried and tested operator, and put her into the vehicle of an unlicensed and therefore uninsured driver."

No apology has been offered to Mr Reynolds, who is holding the council responsible, saying: "I said to the council you're carrying the most precious possession in our household.

"It's a dodgy firm but I hold the council responsible because they gave out that contract. We're chuffed that it's Tilbury Taxis again, and my daughter is chuffed too. They are a lovely firm."

Andy Lever, spokesperson for Thurrock Council said: "Ladycars UK joined Thurrock Council's approved operators list in September 2007.

"Initially there was some confusion over rules that apply in Thurrock and those in London - where the firm is based.

"At the time of Mr and Mrs Reynolds' first complaint the council carried out checks on the drivers and each had been vetted and each had a current operator's licence.

"Last week the council received a complaint that the licence of one driver had expired.

"On investigation it was found that the driver was only licensed to drive a vehicle with less than eight seats.

"Ladycars was severely reprimanded and the contract was removed.

"Emergency cover was found for the next morning and the council's licensing department has been informed."

A spokesperson for Ladycars, whose registered office is 8a Rigg Approach, Leyton, said they were too busy' to speak to the Gazette.

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 05, 2008 7:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Scotland
If that was my child I would have been on to the police instead. :evil: :evil:

it looks like the council has not a clue, mind you do any of them :?:

Could this lady cars uk be an off shoot of the pinks :?: :?: :shock: :shock:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 05, 2008 7:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
skippy41 wrote:
If that was my child I would have been on to the police instead. :evil: :evil:

it looks like the council has not a clue, mind you do any of them :?:

Could this lady cars uk be an off shoot of the pinks :?: :?: :shock: :shock:


Could this be a council going for the cheapest price as opposed to the better service?

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 05, 2008 7:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57349
Location: 1066 Country
Typical of the way some councils are running their schools contract.

F*** safety, it's the bottom line that counts. Image

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 05, 2008 8:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
They like to call it best value. I have quoted some scool runs and lost out to prices that are half what I have quoted. These are usually the jobs that require an escort as well. I asked the lady that issues the contracts to try and explain why the other company were so much cheaper when we both have the same fuel costs etc. i was told that the other company don't charge more than £2 per hour for the escort because it is the drivers wife doing it for pin money. I asked her why she condones the company paying below the minimum wage. she could not answer that but just said that the council could only give the jobs to the lowest, sorry, best value, quote.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 05, 2008 9:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57349
Location: 1066 Country
grandad wrote:
i was told that the other company don't charge more than £2 per hour for the escort because it is the drivers wife doing it for pin money.

Doesn't matter one little jot, the lady should be getting the minimum wage and paying tax/nat insurance on that.

I would report them and anyone else to http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/nmw/complaint.htm

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 05, 2008 9:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
Sussex wrote:
grandad wrote:
i was told that the other company don't charge more than £2 per hour for the escort because it is the drivers wife doing it for pin money.

Doesn't matter one little jot, the lady should be getting the minimum wage and paying tax/nat insurance on that.

I would report them and anyone else to http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/nmw/complaint.htm


Not quite that simple. I am not told specifically who I am quoting agains neither am I told the full address of the child that requires the transport unless I win the contract. The only real information that I have is the school that the child will be going to and there could be several taxis there. So I don't have any real information to pass on to HMRC.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 05, 2008 10:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57349
Location: 1066 Country
grandad wrote:
So I don't have any real information to pass on to HMRC.

That post was a general post and not necessary just for your eyes only. :wink:

But I would question the council via a FoI act request asking why they allow suppliers to the council to pay below the minimum wage. 8-[

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 05, 2008 11:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Scotland
I would also be pointing out that the escort requires an enhanced CRC.and a licence

All escorts in the Borders have to have this, and they are employed and paid the min wage by the council


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 440 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group