skippy41 wrote:
captain cab wrote:
As ever you use 284 words where only half is needed.
I dont know (or care) where West Lowthian is, but at times of peak demand even in deregulated areas, the chances of hailing a cab are about the same.
300 PH shows what? It isn’t a demand for hackney carriages, its a demand for private hire services.
Whats needed is a survey, properly done showing latent and patent demand.
There is also the other argument that the PH are cheaper and thats why there numbers have gone up unless they are fitted with meters.
Then there is also the fact that most folk prefer the comfort of a saloon or MPV (Allegedly)
Right now for a lie down after agreeing with CC for the first time

Then you must be a fool.
A two to one ration PH to taxis shows nothing less than the taxi trade allowing PH to take its work. Only a fool would believe that PH and Taxis are doing the same job, servicing the same customer base. Apart from wheelchair access there is NO difference. And taxis were taxis long before wheelchair access was an issue.
PH are NOT cheaper than taxis. That's a myth which gives PH a business advantage and taxis an excuse for losing their work to them.
The ability to hail a taxi depends on availability of taxis, not whether they are restricted or not. And when people can't hail from the street, then they fone for one. And invariably that market gravitates towards PH, which is why they expand because Taxis can not. Hence the two to one ratio.
As I said Skippy42, agreeing with CC proves you must be a fool.
As for surveys, don't we all know that they are fixed. That councils commission the results to suit the answer they want?