toots wrote:
I don't agree with the zero hours contracts at all, but, there must be some sort of casual labour contract available for when it's needed. These casual labour contracts should not be allowed to form the main supply of staff tho. I suppose to expect commonsense in these situations is a little too much to ask when those that use them are looking at profits before job security. My concerns are how these people on zero hours contracts are supposed to contribute towards the countries needs for the money go round to actually go round, no job security means no spending power which in turn has a bad effect on the economy as people are afraid to spend what little they earn in case they don't earn any next week.
Indeed toots casual short term contracts are of course available, the idea of zero hour contracts is to get people off of job seeker's allowance ie pad out the unemployment figures helped gleefully of course by the Von Windsor parasites .....................their immoral exploitative parasitical scum

_________________
All posts by this contributor are made in a strictly personal capacity
I AM PROUD TO BE A CITIZEN NOBODY'S SUBJECT
http://www.republic.org.uF88K EM ALL WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND
BOOZE BOOZE BOOZE