Another Budget for the Tory filthy rich.
| Taxi Driver Online http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/ |
|
| So? http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=28781 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Nidge2 [ Thu Mar 17, 2016 6:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | So? |
Another Budget for the Tory filthy rich.
|
|
| Author: | captain cab [ Thu Mar 17, 2016 6:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So? |
Cant believe they got away with the sugar tax - cant believe it was applauded by labour - ffs they'll be telling you how often to change your underpants next |
|
| Author: | heathcote [ Thu Mar 17, 2016 8:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So? |
It will not stop people buying such drinks only has increased the price you pay(stealth taxation),The only way to reduce sugar intake is to outlaw the adding of additional sugar to a product.Again we have people saying it is a good way of controlling obesity in children but it will not stop the buying of these products. Osborne will not upset his rich mates in the food industry by outlawing the adding of additional sugar in a product,again it is a smoke screen by him trying to be clever when all it is doing is bump up the price of a product. This action possibly could end up with a challenge by an EU manufacturer who sells products in the UK by claiming that a tariff is being levied to restrict the selling of their product. |
|
| Author: | captain cab [ Thu Mar 17, 2016 11:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So? |
It isn't sugar that's making kids fat. It's SH*T parenting |
|
| Author: | toots [ Thu Mar 17, 2016 11:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So? |
captain cab wrote: It isn't sugar that's making kids fat. It's SH*T parenting 
|
|
| Author: | Nidge2 [ Fri Mar 18, 2016 7:03 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So? |
captain cab wrote: It isn't sugar that's making kids fat. It's SH*T parenting And their cooking habbits. |
|
| Author: | grandad [ Fri Mar 18, 2016 7:05 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So? |
captain cab wrote: It isn't sugar that's making kids fat. It's SH*T parenting What! so if you have good parents the kids can eat as much sugar as they like and they wont become fat? |
|
| Author: | bloodnock [ Fri Mar 18, 2016 10:39 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So? |
captain cab wrote: Cant believe they got away with the sugar tax - cant believe it was applauded by labour - ffs they'll be telling you how often to change your underpants next Fat lardy child will still drink to much Sugary drink, fat lardy mum will dig deeper to fuel fat lardy child's sugar craving, fat greedy Government will get fatter of the extra taxation from fat lardy mothers fat lardy child's addiction to the white stuff. Jamie Oliver wont save a single child, he'll just have made the hard up even harder up through extra taxation. |
|
| Author: | bloodnock [ Fri Mar 18, 2016 10:43 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So? |
grandad wrote: captain cab wrote: It isn't sugar that's making kids fat. It's SH*T parenting What! so if you have good parents the kids can eat as much sugar as they like and they wont become fat? can't you ever read anything the way it's supposed to be read....CC quite clearly states it's sh*t parenting that's creating the problem not good parenting as you are insinuating he meant. |
|
| Author: | trotskys twin [ Fri Mar 18, 2016 3:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So? |
Looks like the fekking vermin could get defeated on this budget, even Tory scum are outraged at the attacks upon the DISABLED AND VULNERABLE got MS TOUGH got Arthritis tough cant even go the toilet unaided Tough got dementia Tough, Even the administrator of a Tory website for the disabled walks out and shuts it down is disgust and the kkunt has voted Tory for 40 years. what a despicable stinking shower these tory vermin are Tax Cuts for the rich and Big Business DEATH SENTENCES FOR THE DISABLED SICK OR ILL KKUNTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTS 
|
|
| Author: | wannabeeahack [ Sun Mar 20, 2016 7:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So? |
Nidge2 wrote: captain cab wrote: It isn't sugar that's making kids fat. It's SH*T parenting And their cooking habbits. 5 macdonalds a week isnt cooking |
|
| Author: | captain cab [ Sun Mar 20, 2016 7:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So? |
bloodnock wrote: can't you ever read anything the way it's supposed to be read....CC quite clearly states it's sh*t parenting that's creating the problem not good parenting as you are insinuating he meant. Your right in what I was meaning. Those who still actually drive cabs and pick up punters recognise the parents who always give in to their boisterous little cherubs - a Greggs sausage roll or some fizzy pop for the 2 minute cab ride, just to keep them quiet obviously. The same parents that let their cherubs wander around asda opening biscuits and eating them before they get to the check out - because if they don't allow that the kid will kick off. I have a solution - stop all benefits and sterilize the feckless. |
|
| Author: | grandad [ Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So? |
captain cab wrote: I have a solution - stop all benefits and sterilize the feckless. You are to late to apply for the post left vacant by IDS. 
|
|
| Author: | captain cab [ Sun Mar 20, 2016 10:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So? |
grandad wrote: captain cab wrote: I have a solution - stop all benefits and sterilize the feckless. You are to late to apply for the post left vacant by IDS. pmsl 
|
|
| Author: | Chris the Fish [ Sun Mar 20, 2016 10:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So? |
grandad wrote: captain cab wrote: I have a solution - stop all benefits and sterilize the feckless. You are to late to apply for the post left vacant by IDS. To be in the Cabinet, CC would have to be an elected MP or, perhaps, be elevated to the House of Lords. As I put elsewhere, I like extreme scenarios.
|
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|