heathcote wrote:
Midlife martyr wrote:
Maximum wage no but if a company can't afford to give the workers more than 2% for example that should apply to the people at the top also after all were all in it together (allegedly).
What you are advocating is automatic widening of the gap between the lower and higher paid.
Percentages should not be used in any talks for wage increases,2% of minimum wage does not give the same increase as 2% of £100,000,if minimum wage earners were given £5 a week increase then every other person must be given £5 a week increase,the gap between earnings at all levels remains the same.
Unions along with employers and Politicians are all equally to blame for the gap constantly widening.
you do talk some bollox heathy on Fleet Street we just said we want 87.5% of your dough or we dont print and that worked until Kinnock and Blair sold us out oh and there was a sh!t faced zlagg named Brenda Dean in there! now its in the house of Lords hope she dies of CANCER a painful variety
Trotsky you and your greed are part of the reason for the demise of newspapers.
Oh and maybe you remember a CEO of a Bank earning zillions whilst the Bank lost zillions not unusual in the BANKSTER RACKET