MR T wrote:
SUSSEX. As i have said before,We are already complying with all the proposals that rupetts department has issued,And have been doing so for years.
We were derestricted years ago (we know it does not work), Only causes extreme finaincial hardship to drivers and owners, Everyone ends up working longer hours for less money .The public end up with a second rate taxi service.Run with part time work force.And the best of it is,When somebody in power realises that they have cocked-up ,We get the blame ,And have to clear up the mess.
We lived through this and know from first hand experience,
but as you, t.d.o, and j.d. would say we know nothing.
If you were de-restricted a few years ago, then it's fair to say that a lot of drivers got their plates for nothing. How much are those plates worth now? Why should some drivers get plates for nothing, whilst others have to pay through the teeth? Is that what you mean by commitment?
I have yet to see any evidence that de-limiting effects the trade, customers don't just suddenly dissapear. However it does effects those that dictate to drivers when they work, and how much they should pay for the priviledge. Why not ask the non plate-holders of your manor if they would rather plate their own vehicle. And if they say no, then you have nothing to fear.
What I have seen is poor vehicle and driver standards effecting the trade. What I have seen is economical downturns having an adverse effect on the trade. All councils can control the former, but none of us can do a lot about the latter.
Take Liverpool, the world was going to end when they de-limited. Strange that none of those extra plates issued were never handed back. Yes those £30,000 ones.
