Tom Thumb wrote:
I have to say i agree with Nidge.
I see it as far from a done deal. Getting the legislation through is going to be far harder.
Do you meant politically or procedurally Tom?
As regards de-limitation, all the Govt have to do is pass a Regulatory Reform Order under the Regulatory Reform Act, and this is a lot less cumbersome than normal legislation, after all that was what the Act was enacted for - to streamline procdures for deregulation and be able to do it without a full blown Act of Parliament.
As I said a week or two ago, the cynic in me thinks that's why the OFT effectively endorsed the status quo - it's easy to implement what they recommended - if they'd recommended root and branch reform then this would have needed a full Act of Parliament, and it would not have been easy to fit such an Act in.
Politically, you and Nidge may be correct, it may be a tough nut to crack, and Labour MPs are more inclined to rebel these days, but I think the Labour leadership will go for it, and the Tories will vote with them since the report obviously portrayed quotas as anti-consumer.
To that extent it's a pity the OFT report was so consumer oriented, since the 'decent living' argument from the T&G et al will still have some resonance with some MPs.
It's a pity the OFT didn't highlight the likes of Dundee, for example, which is in no ones interests except those that happen to hold plates at the moment.
Dusty