Dusty Bin wrote:
Generally speaking though the committee was clearly pro status quo, and the questioning reflected this.
The OFT were pretty unimpressive, as John said, but there's plenty of opportunity to catch someone out on the contents of an 800 page report.
Dusty
Yes I was going to say in an earlier post that the questions asked by the committee were nonsensical at times and the OFT were put in an unenvial position. How do you reply to a nonsensicle question that asks, why did you not survey those people who book cabs by phone? lol presuming you can find them, what question do you ask them?
It was hard for the OFT reps to answer questions that were pointless and misguided, yet they were expected to give coherent answers. That was the first thing I picked up on, that is one of the reasons why I was so dissapointed with the performance of the committee.
With regard to survey stats, six thousand is an extremely large survey. I have figures here that relate to constituency and election surveys that have quotas ranging from 1500. Three thousand is viewed as a large sample.
The offiicial minutes will be out soon, we can all have a good laugh then.
Best wishes
John Davies.
Manchester