JD wrote:
alan G wrote:
JD wrote:
I'm certainly not going to treat him as the real article until such time I'm convinced that he his. However, if he wants to debate the merits of OFT report and quantity controls then I'm sure there are many who will no doubt take his point of view and likewise there will be many who won't? Him using my reference to Dick Haswell as an exit strategy is childish and shows the man does not have the courage of his convictions to debate the point that he feels so strongly about. We've seen it with many others on here and we will no doubt see it in the future.
Do you ever practise what you preach?
http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/vie ... php?t=3483The usual suspects respond with their normal bag of lies and unsubstantiated allegations.
Honesty has no place on this forum, it would appear.
I suspect you are referring to my statement that you looked in either mine or Jim Taylors private message box and that you stole a document from the TDO server which you weren't entitled and then proceeded to published that document for the whole world to see.
I don't see any defamation in the truth do you?
We have still to see evidence of your version of the truth? If we ever did hear it I think most people who subscribe to this forum would have a hard time believing it anyway?
I stand by my words and those who know my search for the truth in all matters will also know I don't make such statements lightly.
You physically downloaded a document from the TDO server which was found by accessing someone elses mail, you then proceeded to make public that document "WITHOUT" the expressed permission of the author, the recipient or anyone legally charged with giving you permission to take and publish the document?
Now I know you have your own limited version of the law but you should be reminded that ignorance of it is unlikely to save you from its justice.
JD
Just for once, JD face the truth. You make these allegations without proof, without any knowledge of the truth and merely as part of a smear campaign. Your supporters blindly jump in to follow you in a feeble attempt to make your lies seem factual.
You claim to know the law. The burden of proof lies with you. Can you prove your lies? No, because the events you suggest did not take place.
You were exposed as a fraud and a liar and this is but a smokescreen to divert others from that fact.
Unlike you, I have nothing to prove.
Perhaps your legal expertise does not extend to such trivialities as innocence assumed until proven guilty?
Login
Register
FAQ
