Gateshead Angel wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Gateshead Angel wrote:
Mr Davies, is the "approximate timescale" the "minimum timescale" or are you making an asumption based on the actual time previously taken to fulfil a Regulatory Reform Order.
B. Lucky

Angel you're probably a very nice guy but one thing you have to realise I'm not your nurse maid. If you want to know about the RRA go and do some leg work and look it up on the net. All the information you require to make a judgement is contained therein. It is all self explanatory. Good Luck.
I'm off out to surf the streets of Manchester, if you get lost on the Net you can reach me on my mobile.
Best wishes
John Davies.
Manchester.
Sorry Mr Davies, its just that you asked another member to quantify a statement yet it seems you are un-willing to do the same.
I asked you, on what do you base your statement regarding timescale for implimentation, this cannot be found on any website. I can, as you suggest, try to work out what I believe would be a realistic timescale for implimentation but that wouldn't answer the question I posed.
B. Lucky

Angel I'm trying to help you. If everyone keeps feeding you by the hand your never going to be able to feed yourself. The information is out there and whatsmore If my memory serves me well, one RRO only took about eight month from consultation to becoming Law. The Average is 12 to 14 Month from the consultation document going out.
There have been 16 orders passed since the act came into force in 2001. One in 2001 seven in 2002 and eight in 2003. There are currently four orders under parliamentary scrutiny. There are three consultation documents underway.
There has been a lot of conjecture about what route the Governemt would take if they amended section 16 of the Transport act. Well it should be patently obvious now that the route they were always going to take was by way of the RRO.
They could have used the 1994 deregulation act but it appears that was ruled out from an early stage. The tell telling sign was the publication of the Regulatory reform action plan published in December last year. I wasn't aware one existed until Dusty mentioned it. If you scroll down to page 38 you will see quite plainly the plans Government have in mind for section 16.
There is an interesting foreward written by Tony Blair and it seems to me that it is inconceivable to think that he and the Cabinet were not aware of the 650 regulatory proposals submitted in this Action plan. Therefore would it not be fair to sumise that the Cabinet had already taken a view on this matter?
Considering all the available facts up to this moment in time I would say the Statement from the Minister of state to be published on or before the 9th of March will say one of two things. (A) The Department needs more time to consider the proposals laid before it by the Office of Fair Trading. or (B) The Department of Transport and the Department of Trade and Industry unanimously agree with the findings of the OFT Report and reccomendations will be put before the Cabinet. If they come out with anything stronger the H/C trade is right in the chit.
More food for thought.
If you've not found what you want by this afternoon Angel I'll come hold your hand. lol
Be good and stop worrying about something that may never happen lol
If the worse comes to the worse Angel you can always come down here and work the Airport with Ged. There are some knowledgeable folk up there I'm sure they will keep you entertained.
Best wishes
John Davies
Manchester.