Sussex wrote:
The majority of WAV people using ambulances don't use them in an emergency, they use them for out-patients appointments. They park exactly the same way as WAV taxis.
Community Transport/Ambulances never ever rank up Sussex, WAV taxis do. In Gateshead they do because the majority have side door loading facilities. My untrust with these vehicles starts and ends with passenger safety, passengers in saloon rear seats often slide accross from the pavement side as they know its safer to do that than to walk onto the road.
Sussex wrote:
That might be right, and they have proper drop off areas at the centre. But do you really think they have proper pick-up areas in all the places where they pick up WAV customers, because they don't.
Well its funny you should say that, although its not common place at the moment, some disabled people who live on main roads have a disabled parking area clearly marked on the road outside their house.
People can argue driver choice, they can argue on purchase and maintainance costs but surely the question of safety should be paramount. I have checked the literature from all the main converters, they all would prefer to supply only side loading WAVs, their argument for supplying a Doblo is down to driver demand for a cheap WAV to obtain a free plate in deregulated areas with manadory WAV policy on new licenses.
Its such a shame that it will take theories to be tested on these vehicles before something is done about ensuring safety. Remember the Police used to tell you to stay in your car if it broke down on the motorway, they now tell you to get out of it, I wonder why that is!
Come on people think a little here, for all of you who already have a rear loader I just hope that its not your vehicle in which someone dies because you couldn't get them out, as it seems it is only following such an incident that people will see the dangers.