Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sun Jan 25, 2026 11:21 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 58 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 01, 2004 6:38 am 
Gateshead Angel wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
you were talking of drivers tests? so you change the subject
I said all things being equal remember?

another argument lost!


When was the argument Geoff, I certainly wasn't having one. All I wanted to point out was that any tests should be accross the board if they are to be fair. And here's me thinking you were all for fairness.

B. Lucky :twisted:



I am and changing rules mid stream and outing drivers who may have invested heavily, aint one of them you can twist dance and jog Mick you are talking twaddle.

tests are there to fail people, if they were not they wouldnt be there!

you are in favour only to get people out Mick.

then you can make bucks, ok do it fairly.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 01, 2004 6:39 am 
Anonymous wrote:
BULL [edited by admin]

our council set on a work study officer, give him a clip board and was told to wait half an hour whilst the trainer returned.

37 years later he was still walking round with a clip board waiting for the trainer to come back!

he said at his retirement the job board him.


Good God

B. Lucky :twisted:


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 01, 2004 6:43 am 
Anonymous wrote:
I am and changing rules mid stream and outing drivers who may have invested heavily, aint one of them you can twist dance and jog Mick you are talking twaddle.

tests are there to fail people, if they were not they wouldnt be there!

you are in favour only to get people out Mick.

then you can make bucks, ok do it fairly.



Oh I see, very clever Geoff.

Have you been drinking again, or did you have meat for your supper.

B. Lucky :twisted:


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 01, 2004 6:44 am 
Gateshead Angel wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
as a T and G I would have liked you to represent the best interests of present incumbants not drive them out of a job.

now Brother, I stick by what I said, perhaps in Gatehead reading tests may be a good thing?

a council has to be both fair and reasonable what you said brother was neither.


So now I'm not allowed an opinion. Think very carefully Geoff about what you are saying mate.

As far as the T&G are concerned, I have no idea what the Cab Section would make of MY views on this subject, that doesn't bother me, raising standards will have a positive effect on the professional taxi driver.

If this did become an issue however, I would represent the members of our branch by taking the majority's views into the council, leaving my own personal views in the house.

How hypocritical it is of you that you quote "union" viewpoint when it suits you but when the "union" is being berated you crawl under that rock you love to hide under. "brother" is it, yeah yeah

B. Lucky :twisted:



you have a duty to protect the interests of members, this proffessional bit is [edited by admin], lets not go to opinions but fact, law

a man in a job when new tests are introduced is entitled to grandfather rights to protect him from modgils like you who would strip them of everything.

are you entitled to an opinion?

well if it displays your utter contempt to fair play go ahead.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 01, 2004 6:49 am 
Lets just get something together.

Should new applicants have to pass a series of tests to assess their knowledge of the requirements to drive for hire?

Should existing licensee's have to pass any further tests along the same lines?

Should these tests apply to P/H drivers in areas where the councils have delimited?

Should these tests apply to P/H drivers in areas where the councils haven't delimited?

Something more than YES/NO would be helpful here as I think there are arguments for and against all of the above posts.

And thats not an invitation to have a go at me Geoff, in between swigs of ale.

B. Lucky :twisted:


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 01, 2004 6:49 am 
Gateshead Angel wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
yes Mick very good guy, why arnet you running an office now?
you fall out with em dont you?


I have no interest to, and I could work for any of the offices I managed so I don't know where you get that I fall out with them all Geoff.

B. Lucky :twisted:


its the impression you give especialy when you are rhiles you say contempable things about people in your offices.

I can just see someone who gets stuck and runs.

3 offices is a hell of a lot, loyalty is missing somewhere, and I see that comming from your employers.

ie involantary left can see you mick so successfull and so caring about drivers, just leaving?


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 01, 2004 6:54 am 
Gateshead Angel wrote:
Lets just get something together.

Should new applicants have to pass a series of tests to assess their knowledge of the requirements to drive for hire?

Should existing licensee's have to pass any further tests along the same lines?

Should these tests apply to P/H drivers in areas where the councils have delimited?

Should these tests apply to P/H drivers in areas where the councils haven't delimited?

Something more than YES/NO would be helpful here as I think there are arguments for and against all of the above posts.

And thats not an invitation to have a go at me Geoff, in between swigs of ale.

B. Lucky :twisted:


1 yes.
2 do its unlawfull, there is a difference between renewal and new applications.

3. in law no in my opinion yes.
4 delimitation has nothing to do with private hire
5 I am a tee totaler


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 01, 2004 6:56 am 
Gateshead Angel wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I am and changing rules mid stream and outing drivers who may have invested heavily, aint one of them you can twist dance and jog Mick you are talking twaddle.

tests are there to fail people, if they were not they wouldnt be there!

you are in favour only to get people out Mick.

then you can make bucks, ok do it fairly.



Oh I see, very clever Geoff.

Have you been drinking again, or did you have meat for your supper.

B. Lucky :twisted:


Mick
I am a vegitairian but allow myself gravy.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 01, 2004 6:59 am 
Anonymous wrote:
Gateshead Angel wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
yes Mick very good guy, why arnet you running an office now?
you fall out with em dont you?


I have no interest to, and I could work for any of the offices I managed so I don't know where you get that I fall out with them all Geoff.

B. Lucky :twisted:


its the impression you give especialy when you are rhiles you say contempable things about people in your offices.

I can just see someone who gets stuck and runs.

3 offices is a hell of a lot, loyalty is missing somewhere, and I see that comming from your employers.

ie involantary left can see you mick so successfull and so caring about drivers, just leaving?


Not really like Geoff.

One of the offices I ran for 5 years, built it up from 25 to 47 cars, all drivers making money and all happy. The owner sold the business and the new guy wanted to run it himself and save my wages. He has since sold the office to the drivers who hung around after I left, its now a 15 car office. The second I agreed to manage for 12 months, following the merger of two offices, to assist with transition. I instigated various working systems and they are still in place now and the office is one of the biggest in the area. The third was for a bloke that left the first office I managed, who asked me to help set up his new office, I agreed, again for the first 12 months. His office is now doing very well indeed, thank you very much.

Sometimes I worry about you Geoff, I really do.

B. Lucky :twisted:


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 01, 2004 7:00 am 
Anonymous wrote:
Mick
I am a vegitairian but allow myself gravy.


I think its time you gave that up then Geoff :lol:

B. Lucky :twisted:


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 01, 2004 2:29 pm 
Gateshead Angel wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Gateshead Angel wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
yes Mick very good guy, why arnet you running an office now?
you fall out with em dont you?


I have no interest to, and I could work for any of the offices I managed so I don't know where you get that I fall out with them all Geoff.

B. Lucky :twisted:


its the impression you give especialy when you are rhiles you say contempable things about people in your offices.

I can just see someone who gets stuck and runs.

3 offices is a hell of a lot, loyalty is missing somewhere, and I see that comming from your employers.

ie involantary left can see you mick so successfull and so caring about drivers, just leaving?


Not really like Geoff.

One of the offices I ran for 5 years, built it up from 25 to 47 cars, all drivers making money and all happy. The owner sold the business and the new guy wanted to run it himself and save my wages. He has since sold the office to the drivers who hung around after I left, its now a 15 car office. The second I agreed to manage for 12 months, following the merger of two offices, to assist with transition. I instigated various working systems and they are still in place now and the office is one of the biggest in the area. The third was for a bloke that left the first office I managed, who asked me to help set up his new office, I agreed, again for the first 12 months. His office is now doing very well indeed, thank you very much.

Sometimes I worry about you Geoff, I really do.

B. Lucky :twisted:


yes I worry too
this is the only trade I have been in where I could trust nobody

its a weird trade.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 01, 2004 2:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2003 12:04 am
Posts: 725
Location: Essex, England
There are still some people you can trust in this trade Geoff.

Just not many.

Sadly, society measures success not by how honest and happy a person is, but by how much money and power they have. And I'm afraid, the two aspects are not mutually compatible.

When drug dealers are admired and respected because they have big houses and fast cars and power and money, yet people with detailed knowledge of specific interests are insulted, belittled and decried as "Anoraks" or "nurds" what hope is there for the society in which we live.

_________________
There is Significant Unmet Demand for my Opinion.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 01, 2004 3:03 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 56975
Location: 1066 Country
Gateshead Angel wrote:
Lets just get something together.

Should new applicants have to pass a series of tests to assess their knowledge of the requirements to drive for hire?

Should existing licensee's have to pass any further tests along the same lines?

Should these tests apply to P/H drivers in areas where the councils have delimited?

Should these tests apply to P/H drivers in areas where the councils haven't delimited?

Something more than YES/NO would be helpful here as I think there are arguments for and against all of the above posts.


Yes.
No, apart from those that reach a certain amount of penalty points.
Only new drivers, and the above.
Only new drivers, and the above.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 58 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 56 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group