Yorkie wrote:
we need saloons for disabled people god one barmy argument to another
you are all mad!
Can I refer you to a post I made some time ago concerning the WAV Gateshead operation we set up to make WAVs more available, at the request of the disabled community and representative groups.
One major account we had was with Gateshead Access Panel, the very first job we had was from these people and they insisted on a saloon. Remember not all disabled people are in wheelchairs or have disabilities which are immediatly visable.
Its not just us thats mad.
The question wasn't about the viability of buying a saloon and plate over that of a WAV, it was intended to show that even in areas where plates are derestricted a premium is still saught for the saloon plate and acknowledgement that derestriction with "quality controls" would have little or no effect on current plate premiums, although the argument of reduced takings would still remain questionable.
All of the examples listed, and JD's refusal to accept that what I was posting was true is why I have continued this argument, what others contribute within the thread is not within my control.
I have much more respect for JD than he has for me, I intended only to point out what others would have identified as questionable or misleading from his list if published, surely such points are better discussed on here instead of in front of the whole trade or before a council.
B. Lucky
