| Taxi Driver Online http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/ |
|
| Another couple gone John, NE Lincs & Wolves de-limit. http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=1073 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Sussex [ Tue Oct 26, 2004 9:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Another couple gone John, NE Lincs & Wolves de-limit. |
Slough made it 125 left, and now my good friends in North East Lincolnshire have made it that Engalnd and Wales now have only 124 councils that still restrict.
NE Lincs Council Report. http://www.nelincs.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/ ... 131900.doc Minutes of meeting. http://www.nelincs.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/ ... 131900.doc And have Wolverhampton made it only 123?
Minutes of meeting. http://www.wolverhampton.gov.uk/NR/rdon ... 150904.pdf |
|
| Author: | JD [ Sat Nov 06, 2004 6:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Another couple gone John, NE Lincs & Wolves de-limit |
Sussex wrote: Slough made it 125 left, and now my good friends in North East Lincolnshire have made it that Engalnd and Wales now have only 124 councils that still restrict.
NE Lincs Council Report. http://www.nelincs.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/ ... 131900.doc Minutes of meeting. http://www.nelincs.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/ ... 131900.doc And have Wolverhampton made it only 123? Minutes of meeting. http://www.wolverhampton.gov.uk/NR/rdon ... 150904.pdf I'll get around to updating the list very soon, I've been quite busy recently. I have noticed some councils and one particular monthly Taxi magazine are still quoting outdated figures. I can't blame councils for quoting these figures but I have no sympathy for publications who broadcast misleading information. Best wishes JD |
|
| Author: | Alex [ Sat Nov 06, 2004 8:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Bearing in mind the hundreds of thousands of pounds of advertising that goes into that publication, compared to the 'not a penny' that goes into TDO, you would have thought the said publication would get it right. Alex |
|
| Author: | Yorkie [ Sat Nov 06, 2004 8:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Alex wrote: Bearing in mind the hundreds of thousands of pounds of advertising that goes into that publication, compared to the 'not a penny' that goes into TDO, you would have thought the said publication would get it right.
Alex YOU ARE JOKING! news international sends billions and they cannot get it right and the not a penny one that suprises me but they dont get it right either |
|
| Author: | JD [ Thu Nov 11, 2004 7:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Another couple gone John, NE Lincs & Wolves de-limit |
For those who like to keep up with latest information on what licensing Authorities are doing with regard to numbers policy. Here is the latest provisional update. I left Blackpool off the first published list but I understand Blackpool still have a restricted policy so naturally I added them to this new list. If anyone sees any discrepencies in this list, please let me know. 1 Ashford. Still Restricted, to be reviewed early 2005. 2 Aylesbury Vale. 3 Babergh. Still Restricted 4 Barnsley. Survey commissioned on unmet demand. 5 Barrow in Furness. Still Restricted 6 Basildon. Still Restricted 7 Basingstoke. Still Restricted 8 Bath and North East Somerset ua 9 Bedford. Still Restricted. 10 Blackburn Darwen ua. Still Restricted 11 Blackpool 12 Blyth Valley. Restricted 13 Bolton. Restricted. 14 Bournemouth ua. Restricted 15 Bradford. Still Restricted 16 Braintree. Still Restricted 17 Brighton and Hove ua. Still Restricted. 18 Burnley. Restricted 19 Carrick. Restricted 20 Cherwell. 20 Chester 21 Chester le street, 22 Chorley 23 Colchester 24 Congleton 25 Conwy 26 Copeland 27 Corby 28 Denbighshire 29 Dover 30 Durham 31 Easington 32 East Lindsey 33 East Riding, 34 Eastbourne 35 Eastleigh, 36 Ellesmere Port 37 Exeter. Decision imminent. 38 Fylde 39 Gosport, 40 Great Yarmouth, 41 Gwynedd, 42 Halton ua, 43 Harrogate 44 Havant, 45 High Peak 46 Huntingdonshire 47 Hyndburn, 48 Ipswich 49 Kerrier 50 Kettering 51 Kings Lynn 52 Kingston upon Hull 53 Kirklees 54 Lancaster, 55 Leeds. Consultations currently underway. 56 Leicester 57 Lincoln 58 Liverpool. Still Restricted 59 Luton ua. 60 Maidstone 61 Manchester. Still Restricted. 62 Merthyr Tydfil. Decision imminent. 63 Middlesbrough ua 64 Mole Valley 65 New Forest 66 Newcastle on Tyne. Restricted. 67 Newcastle under Lyme 68 Nottingham ua 69 Oldham. Still Restricted. 70 Oxford 71 Pendle 72 Penwith 73 Plymouth ua. Pending, to be announced in December 74 Poole ua 75 Portsmouth ua 76 Preston 77 Reading ua, 78 Reigate and Banstead 79 Restormal 80 Ribble Valley 81 Richmondshire 82 Rochdale, 83 Rotherham 84 Rugby 85 Salford. Could possibly commission local survey. 86 Scarborough 87 Sefton *Solihull removing quotas in March 2005 88 South Bedfordshire 89 South Ribble 90 South Tyneside 91 Southampton ua 92 Southend on sea ua 93 St Edmundsbury 94 St Helens 95 Stevenage 96 Stockport 97 Stoke on Trent ua 98 Swindon ua 99 Tameside 100 Teignbridge 101 Test Valley 102 Thanet 103 Thurrock ua 104 Torbay ua 105 Torfaen 106 Torridge. Decision on quotas imminent. 107 Trafford 108 Tunbridge wells, 109 Wakefield 110 Walsall 111 Wansbeck 112 Warrington ua 113 Watford 114 West Somerset 115 Weymouth 116 Wigan 117 Windsor and Maidenhead ua. 118 Wolverhampton. Decision on quotas imminent. 119 Worthing 120 Wrexham 121 Wycombe 122 Wyre. 123 Wyre Forest. Provisional decision to de-restrict. Ratification imminent. 124 York ua. |
|
| Author: | Nidge2 [ Fri Nov 12, 2004 9:40 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
You forgot Derby |
|
| Author: | up north cabbie [ Fri Nov 12, 2004 11:17 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
durham more plates issued again |
|
| Author: | JD [ Fri Nov 12, 2004 4:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Nidge wrote: You forgot Derby
Derby does not have restrictions Nigel. Best wishes JD |
|
| Author: | Sussex [ Fri Nov 12, 2004 9:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Another couple gone John, NE Lincs & Wolves de-limit |
JD wrote: 3 Babergh. Still Restricted
They are having a look at things, but having read the de-limit report to councillors I would put my hat on them de-limiting.
http://babedist02.uuhost.uk.uu.net/lega ... s/d152.htm |
|
| Author: | Guest [ Sat Nov 13, 2004 8:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Cant see waht the problem with baberg is. They had a look at demand 30 years ago.
And having a 15,000 survey for 20 cars really makes sense.
|
|
| Author: | JD [ Mon Nov 15, 2004 5:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
30% of councils at present have a restricted numbers policy. The latest to change that policy to one of non restriction is East Lindsey. The total now stands at 123. 1 Ashford. To be reviewed early 2005. 2 Aylesbury Vale. 3 Babergh. 4 Barnsley. Survey commissioned on unmet demand. 5 Barrow in Furness. 6 Basildon. 7 Basingstoke. 8 Bath and North East Somerset ua 9 Bedford. 10 Blackburn Darwen ua. Consultation on deregulation underway, scheduled to finish end Nov. 11 Blackpool. 256 hacks, 44 horse drawn. Intention is to keep a numbers policy. 12 Blyth Valley. 41 hacks, decision on change of policy early 2005. 13 Bolton. 14 Bournemouth ua. 15 Bradford. 16 Braintree. 17 Brighton and Hove ua. 18 Burnley. 19 Carrick. Conducting a survey. 20 Cherwell. 20 Chester. Licensing meeting on December 9. 21 Chester le street, 22 Chorley 23 Colchester 24 Congleton 25 Conwy 26 Copeland 27 Corby 28 Denbighshire 29 Dover 30 Durham 31 Easington East Lindsey. Is the latest to removed restrictions. All new licences will be WAV. 32 East Riding, 33 Eastbourne 34 Eastleigh, 35 Ellesmere Port 36 Exeter. Decision imminent. 37 Fylde 38 Gosport. 39 Great Yarmouth. 40 Gwynedd, 41 Halton ua, 42 Harrogate 43 Havant, 44 High Peak 45 Huntingdonshire 46 Hyndburn, 47 Ipswich 48 Kerrier 49 Kettering 50 Kings Lynn 51 Kingston upon Hull 52 Kirklees 53 Lancaster, 54 Leeds. Council has expressed a preference for de restriction, consultations currently underway. 55 Leicester 56 Lincoln 57 Liverpool. 58 Luton ua. 59 Maidstone 60 Manchester. 61 Merthyr Tydfil. Decision imminent. 62 Middlesbrough ua 63 Mole Valley 64 New Forest 65 Newcastle on Tyne. 66 Newcastle under Lyme 67 Nottingham ua 68 Oldham. 69 Oxford 70 Pendle 71 Penwith 72 Plymouth ua. Pending, to be announced in December 73 Poole ua 74 Portsmouth ua 75 Preston 76 Reading ua, 77 Reigate and Banstead 78 Restormal 79 Ribble Valley 80 Richmondshire 81 Rochdale, 82 Rotherham 83 Rugby 84 Salford. Presently addressing Government guidance, could possibly commission local survey. 85 Scarborough 86 Sefton 87 South Bedfordshire 88 South Ribble 89 South Tyneside 90 Southampton ua 91 Southend on sea ua 92 St Edmundsbury 93 St Helens 94 Stevenage 95 Stockport 96 Stoke on Trent ua 97 Swindon ua 98 Tameside 99 Teignbridge 100 Test Valley 101 Thanet 102 Thurrock ua 103 Torbay ua 104 Torfaen 105 Torridge. Decision on quotas imminent. 106 Trafford 107 Tunbridge wells, 108 Wakefield 109 Walsall 110 Wansbeck 111 Warrington ua 112 Watford 113 West Somerset 114 Weymouth 115 Wigan 116 Windsor and Maidenhead ua, 117 Wolverhampton. Decision on quotas imminent. 118 Worthing 119 Wrexham 120 Wycombe 121 Wyre. 122 Wyre Forest. Provisional decision has been made to de-restrict numbers, ratification is imminent. 123 York ua. |
|
| Author: | Sussex [ Mon Nov 15, 2004 8:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
JD wrote: The latest to change that policy to one of non restriction is East Lindsey. The total now stands at 123.
I don't know were it is, but I love it none the less.
|
|
| Author: | Nidge2 [ Mon Nov 15, 2004 8:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Sussex wrote: JD wrote: The latest to change that policy to one of non restriction is East Lindsey. The total now stands at 123. I don't know were it is, but I love it none the less. ![]() East Lindsey covers the east coast of Lincolnshire. |
|
| Author: | Sussex [ Mon Nov 15, 2004 8:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Nidge wrote: East Lindsey covers the east coast of Lincolnshire.
Ah bless !!!! I think that's called East Lincs.
|
|
| Author: | Sussex [ Mon Nov 15, 2004 8:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Another couple gone John, NE Lincs & Wolves de-limit |
JD wrote: 6 Basildon. Still Restricted
I don't think it will be too long before Basildon join the rush. http://www.basildonmeetings.info/ieList ... 2004&Ver=4 The voting was 12-0 in favour of the LO's recommendations to delimit.
|
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|