Taxi Driver Online
http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/

Another couple gone John, NE Lincs & Wolves de-limit.
http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=1073
Page 1 of 2

Author:  Sussex [ Tue Oct 26, 2004 9:07 pm ]
Post subject:  Another couple gone John, NE Lincs & Wolves de-limit.

Slough made it 125 left, and now my good friends in North East Lincolnshire have made it that Engalnd and Wales now have only 124 councils that still restrict. :D :D :D :D :D

NE Lincs Council Report.
http://www.nelincs.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/ ... 131900.doc

Minutes of meeting.
http://www.nelincs.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/ ... 131900.doc

And have Wolverhampton made it only 123? :shock:

Minutes of meeting.
http://www.wolverhampton.gov.uk/NR/rdon ... 150904.pdf

Author:  JD [ Sat Nov 06, 2004 6:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Another couple gone John, NE Lincs & Wolves de-limit

Sussex wrote:
Slough made it 125 left, and now my good friends in North East Lincolnshire have made it that Engalnd and Wales now have only 124 councils that still restrict. :D :D :D :D :D

NE Lincs Council Report.
http://www.nelincs.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/ ... 131900.doc

Minutes of meeting.
http://www.nelincs.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/ ... 131900.doc

And have Wolverhampton made it only 123? :shock:

Minutes of meeting.
http://www.wolverhampton.gov.uk/NR/rdon ... 150904.pdf


I'll get around to updating the list very soon, I've been quite busy recently. I have noticed some councils and one particular monthly Taxi magazine are still quoting outdated figures. I can't blame councils for quoting these figures but I have no sympathy for publications who broadcast misleading information.

Best wishes

JD

Author:  Alex [ Sat Nov 06, 2004 8:09 pm ]
Post subject: 

Bearing in mind the hundreds of thousands of pounds of advertising that goes into that publication, compared to the 'not a penny' that goes into TDO, you would have thought the said publication would get it right.

Alex

Author:  Yorkie [ Sat Nov 06, 2004 8:37 pm ]
Post subject: 

Alex wrote:
Bearing in mind the hundreds of thousands of pounds of advertising that goes into that publication, compared to the 'not a penny' that goes into TDO, you would have thought the said publication would get it right.

Alex


YOU ARE JOKING!
news international sends billions and they cannot get it right

and the not a penny one that suprises me but they dont get it right either

Author:  JD [ Thu Nov 11, 2004 7:10 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Another couple gone John, NE Lincs & Wolves de-limit

For those who like to keep up with latest information on what licensing Authorities are doing with regard to numbers policy. Here is the latest provisional update. I left Blackpool off the first published list but I understand Blackpool still have a restricted policy so naturally I added them to this new list. If anyone sees any discrepencies in this list, please let me know.


1 Ashford. Still Restricted, to be reviewed early 2005.
2 Aylesbury Vale.
3 Babergh. Still Restricted
4 Barnsley. Survey commissioned on unmet demand.
5 Barrow in Furness. Still Restricted
6 Basildon. Still Restricted
7 Basingstoke. Still Restricted
8 Bath and North East Somerset ua
9 Bedford. Still Restricted.
10 Blackburn Darwen ua. Still Restricted
11 Blackpool
12 Blyth Valley. Restricted
13 Bolton. Restricted.
14 Bournemouth ua. Restricted
15 Bradford. Still Restricted
16 Braintree. Still Restricted
17 Brighton and Hove ua. Still Restricted.
18 Burnley. Restricted
19 Carrick. Restricted
20 Cherwell.
20 Chester
21 Chester le street,
22 Chorley
23 Colchester
24 Congleton
25 Conwy
26 Copeland
27 Corby
28 Denbighshire
29 Dover
30 Durham
31 Easington
32 East Lindsey
33 East Riding,
34 Eastbourne
35 Eastleigh,
36 Ellesmere Port
37 Exeter. Decision imminent.
38 Fylde
39 Gosport,
40 Great Yarmouth,
41 Gwynedd,
42 Halton ua,
43 Harrogate
44 Havant,
45 High Peak
46 Huntingdonshire
47 Hyndburn,
48 Ipswich
49 Kerrier
50 Kettering
51 Kings Lynn
52 Kingston upon Hull
53 Kirklees
54 Lancaster,
55 Leeds. Consultations currently underway.
56 Leicester
57 Lincoln
58 Liverpool. Still Restricted
59 Luton ua.
60 Maidstone
61 Manchester. Still Restricted.
62 Merthyr Tydfil. Decision imminent.
63 Middlesbrough ua
64 Mole Valley
65 New Forest
66 Newcastle on Tyne. Restricted.
67 Newcastle under Lyme
68 Nottingham ua
69 Oldham. Still Restricted.
70 Oxford
71 Pendle
72 Penwith
73 Plymouth ua. Pending, to be announced in December
74 Poole ua
75 Portsmouth ua
76 Preston
77 Reading ua,
78 Reigate and Banstead
79 Restormal
80 Ribble Valley
81 Richmondshire
82 Rochdale,
83 Rotherham
84 Rugby
85 Salford. Could possibly commission local survey.
86 Scarborough
87 Sefton
*Solihull removing quotas in March 2005
88 South Bedfordshire
89 South Ribble
90 South Tyneside
91 Southampton ua
92 Southend on sea ua
93 St Edmundsbury
94 St Helens
95 Stevenage
96 Stockport
97 Stoke on Trent ua
98 Swindon ua
99 Tameside
100 Teignbridge
101 Test Valley
102 Thanet
103 Thurrock ua
104 Torbay ua
105 Torfaen
106 Torridge. Decision on quotas imminent.
107 Trafford
108 Tunbridge wells,
109 Wakefield
110 Walsall
111 Wansbeck
112 Warrington ua
113 Watford
114 West Somerset
115 Weymouth
116 Wigan
117 Windsor and Maidenhead ua.
118 Wolverhampton. Decision on quotas imminent.
119 Worthing
120 Wrexham
121 Wycombe
122 Wyre.
123 Wyre Forest. Provisional decision to de-restrict. Ratification imminent.
124 York ua.

Author:  Nidge2 [ Fri Nov 12, 2004 9:40 am ]
Post subject: 

You forgot Derby

Author:  up north cabbie [ Fri Nov 12, 2004 11:17 am ]
Post subject: 

durham more plates issued again

Author:  JD [ Fri Nov 12, 2004 4:09 pm ]
Post subject: 

Nidge wrote:
You forgot Derby


Derby does not have restrictions Nigel.

Best wishes

JD

Author:  Sussex [ Fri Nov 12, 2004 9:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Another couple gone John, NE Lincs & Wolves de-limit

JD wrote:
3 Babergh. Still Restricted

They are having a look at things, but having read the de-limit report to councillors I would put my hat on them de-limiting. :wink:

http://babedist02.uuhost.uk.uu.net/lega ... s/d152.htm

Author:  Guest [ Sat Nov 13, 2004 8:12 pm ]
Post subject: 

Cant see waht the problem with baberg is.
They had a look at demand 30 years ago. :lol: :lol:
And having a 15,000 survey for 20 cars really makes sense. :lol: :lol:

Author:  JD [ Mon Nov 15, 2004 5:33 pm ]
Post subject: 

30% of councils at present have a restricted numbers policy. The latest to change that policy to one of non restriction is East Lindsey. The total now stands at 123.

1 Ashford. To be reviewed early 2005.
2 Aylesbury Vale.
3 Babergh.
4 Barnsley. Survey commissioned on unmet demand.
5 Barrow in Furness.
6 Basildon.
7 Basingstoke.
8 Bath and North East Somerset ua
9 Bedford.
10 Blackburn Darwen ua. Consultation on deregulation underway, scheduled to finish end Nov.
11 Blackpool. 256 hacks, 44 horse drawn. Intention is to keep a numbers policy.
12 Blyth Valley. 41 hacks, decision on change of policy early 2005.
13 Bolton.
14 Bournemouth ua.
15 Bradford.
16 Braintree.
17 Brighton and Hove ua.
18 Burnley.
19 Carrick. Conducting a survey.
20 Cherwell.
20 Chester. Licensing meeting on December 9.
21 Chester le street,
22 Chorley
23 Colchester
24 Congleton
25 Conwy
26 Copeland
27 Corby
28 Denbighshire
29 Dover
30 Durham
31 Easington
East Lindsey. Is the latest to removed restrictions. All new licences will be WAV.
32 East Riding,
33 Eastbourne
34 Eastleigh,
35 Ellesmere Port
36 Exeter. Decision imminent.
37 Fylde
38 Gosport.
39 Great Yarmouth.
40 Gwynedd,
41 Halton ua,
42 Harrogate
43 Havant,
44 High Peak
45 Huntingdonshire
46 Hyndburn,
47 Ipswich
48 Kerrier
49 Kettering
50 Kings Lynn
51 Kingston upon Hull
52 Kirklees
53 Lancaster,
54 Leeds. Council has expressed a preference for de restriction, consultations currently underway.
55 Leicester
56 Lincoln
57 Liverpool.
58 Luton ua.
59 Maidstone
60 Manchester.
61 Merthyr Tydfil. Decision imminent.
62 Middlesbrough ua
63 Mole Valley
64 New Forest
65 Newcastle on Tyne.
66 Newcastle under Lyme
67 Nottingham ua
68 Oldham.
69 Oxford
70 Pendle
71 Penwith
72 Plymouth ua. Pending, to be announced in December
73 Poole ua
74 Portsmouth ua
75 Preston
76 Reading ua,
77 Reigate and Banstead
78 Restormal
79 Ribble Valley
80 Richmondshire
81 Rochdale,
82 Rotherham
83 Rugby
84 Salford. Presently addressing Government guidance, could possibly commission local survey.
85 Scarborough
86 Sefton
87 South Bedfordshire
88 South Ribble
89 South Tyneside
90 Southampton ua
91 Southend on sea ua
92 St Edmundsbury
93 St Helens
94 Stevenage
95 Stockport
96 Stoke on Trent ua
97 Swindon ua
98 Tameside
99 Teignbridge
100 Test Valley
101 Thanet
102 Thurrock ua
103 Torbay ua
104 Torfaen
105 Torridge. Decision on quotas imminent.
106 Trafford
107 Tunbridge wells,
108 Wakefield
109 Walsall
110 Wansbeck
111 Warrington ua
112 Watford
113 West Somerset
114 Weymouth
115 Wigan
116 Windsor and Maidenhead ua,
117 Wolverhampton. Decision on quotas imminent.
118 Worthing
119 Wrexham
120 Wycombe
121 Wyre.
122 Wyre Forest. Provisional decision has been made to de-restrict numbers, ratification is imminent.
123 York ua.

Author:  Sussex [ Mon Nov 15, 2004 8:17 pm ]
Post subject: 

JD wrote:
The latest to change that policy to one of non restriction is East Lindsey. The total now stands at 123.

I don't know were it is, but I love it none the less. \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/

Author:  Nidge2 [ Mon Nov 15, 2004 8:40 pm ]
Post subject: 

Sussex wrote:
JD wrote:
The latest to change that policy to one of non restriction is East Lindsey. The total now stands at 123.

I don't know were it is, but I love it none the less. \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/


East Lindsey covers the east coast of Lincolnshire.

Author:  Sussex [ Mon Nov 15, 2004 8:43 pm ]
Post subject: 

Nidge wrote:
East Lindsey covers the east coast of Lincolnshire.

Ah bless !!!!

I think that's called East Lincs. [-(

Author:  Sussex [ Mon Nov 15, 2004 8:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Another couple gone John, NE Lincs & Wolves de-limit

JD wrote:
6 Basildon. Still Restricted

I don't think it will be too long before Basildon join the rush.

http://www.basildonmeetings.info/ieList ... 2004&Ver=4

The voting was 12-0 in favour of the LO's recommendations to delimit. \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/ \:D/

Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/