Taxi Driver Online :: View topic - Southampton Council ignore case law !!!!

I'm curious as I registered last year but haven't posted until now because I don't really want any more forum life for myself, but you do read like one of those ppl who has to scratch a nice car because you ain't got one yourself.

Doom wrote:

You analogy is a tad flawed as not many councils give away nice cars for free.

The fact that we still have people like you who think a system that stops equally qualified drivers having the same opportunities as the rest is a very sad thing in the year 2009. :sad:

I never said council cars, I mean someone saves up and buys a brand new car, and it's sitting there all shinny and someone like you cannot resist putting a key down it.

Doom wrote:

I never said council cars, I mean someone saves up and buys a brand new car, and it's sitting there all shinny and someone like you cannot resist putting a key down it.

I know what you said, and I heard it all before.

In one ear, out the other.

Sussex wrote:

Doom wrote:

Really, well in that case I'll be moving into your house later, just because I feel it's unfair you have one and I don't, it's your analogy that is flawed, if you made any sense it would mean I can be a brain surgeon just because I want to, stop bitching others who've put up, and either get your wallet out or find another job, ohh green one.

I never said council cars, I mean someone saves up and buys a brand new car, and it's sitting there all shinny and someone like you cannot resist putting a key down it.

Why are you so issue more plates about things mate, do you own one or is it a case of you want one, or you just don't like anyone having anything that you don't?

I'm curious as I registered last year but haven't posted until now because I don't really want any more forum life for myself, but you do read like one of those ppl who has to scratch a nice car because you ain't got one yourself.

Put me straight on it I could be wrong.

Doom, with the greatest respect, as many people on here will tell you, there is no greater advocate for regulated numbers than myself.

However, even as an advocate for regulation, I find your arguments off the wall to say the least.

CC

I actually agree that numbers should be regulated. Managed regulation would be the best solution if it could be worked out, but, something needs to be done about selling the plates. As I understand it they're not theirs to sell

toots wrote:

I paritally agree....which means we disagree....now theres a first :wink:

And which part do you disagree with and there's a first time for everything :shock:

toots wrote:

And which part do you disagree with and there's a first time for everything :shock:

Selling the plates.....I dont agree with it.....but how is it going to stop given caselaw?

CC

Author:	Sussex [ Thu Mar 12, 2009 8:44 pm ]
Post subject:	Southampton Council ignore case law !!!!
Halcrow do a study, they say an extra 19 plates need to be issued to meet existed taxi SUD, yet councillors decide to issue them over three years. Story from local press Report to councillors including Halcrow report

Author:	Doom [ Mon Mar 16, 2009 4:42 pm ]
Post subject:
Why are you so issue more plates about things mate, do you own one or is it a case of you want one, or you just don't like anyone having anything that you don't? I'm curious as I registered last year but haven't posted until now because I don't really want any more forum life for myself, but you do read like one of those ppl who has to scratch a nice car because you ain't got one yourself. Put me straight on it I could be wrong.

Author:	Sussex [ Mon Mar 16, 2009 5:28 pm ]
Post subject:
Doom wrote: I'm curious as I registered last year but haven't posted until now because I don't really want any more forum life for myself, but you do read like one of those ppl who has to scratch a nice car because you ain't got one yourself. You analogy is a tad flawed as not many councils give away nice cars for free. The fact that we still have people like you who think a system that stops equally qualified drivers having the same opportunities as the rest is a very sad thing in the year 2009.

Author:	Doom [ Mon Mar 16, 2009 5:48 pm ]
Post subject:
Sussex wrote: Doom wrote: I'm curious as I registered last year but haven't posted until now because I don't really want any more forum life for myself, but you do read like one of those ppl who has to scratch a nice car because you ain't got one yourself. You analogy is a tad flawed as not many councils give away nice cars for free. The fact that we still have people like you who think a system that stops equally qualified drivers having the same opportunities as the rest is a very sad thing in the year 2009. Really, well in that case I'll be moving into your house later, just because I feel it's unfair you have one and I don't, it's your analogy that is flawed, if you made any sense it would mean I can be a brain surgeon just because I want to, stop bitching others who've put up, and either get your wallet out or find another job, ohh green one. I never said council cars, I mean someone saves up and buys a brand new car, and it's sitting there all shinny and someone like you cannot resist putting a key down it.

Author:	Sussex [ Mon Mar 16, 2009 5:55 pm ]
Post subject:
Doom wrote: I never said council cars, I mean someone saves up and buys a brand new car, and it's sitting there all shinny and someone like you cannot resist putting a key down it. I know what you said, and I heard it all before. In one ear, out the other.

Taxi Driver Online http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/

Southampton Council ignore case law !!!! http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=10964	Page 1 of 3

Author:	Doom [ Mon Mar 16, 2009 5:56 pm ]
Post subject:
Sussex wrote: Doom wrote: I never said council cars, I mean someone saves up and buys a brand new car, and it's sitting there all shinny and someone like you cannot resist putting a key down it. I know what you said, and I heard it all before. In one ear, out the other. Then my friend I suggest you become an MP, because as you've just said, in one out the other, sums you up really doesn't it.

Author:	gusmac [ Mon Mar 16, 2009 8:32 pm ]
Post subject:
Doom wrote: Sussex wrote: Doom wrote: I'm curious as I registered last year but haven't posted until now because I don't really want any more forum life for myself, but you do read like one of those ppl who has to scratch a nice car because you ain't got one yourself. You analogy is a tad flawed as not many councils give away nice cars for free. The fact that we still have people like you who think a system that stops equally qualified drivers having the same opportunities as the rest is a very sad thing in the year 2009. Really, well in that case I'll be moving into your house later, just because I feel it's unfair you have one and I don't, it's your analogy that is flawed, if you made any sense it would mean I can be a brain surgeon just because I want to, stop bitching others who've put up, and either get your wallet out or find another job, ohh green one. I never said council cars, I mean someone saves up and buys a brand new car, and it's sitting there all shinny and someone like you cannot resist putting a key down it. We are not talking about a shiney new car here and you know it. We are talking about a licence to trade, issued by a public body. A licence which was issued for a nominal sum in the past. It has no value except in the fact that the only way to get one is to line some hungry barsteward's pocket. Restricted plates protect only the plate holder, and ensures him of a free income at the expense of others. Your argument is pitifully poor and stinks of "I'm all right Jack"

Author:	captain cab [ Mon Mar 16, 2009 8:35 pm ]
Post subject:
Doom, with the greatest respect, as many people on here will tell you, there is no greater advocate for regulated numbers than myself. However, even as an advocate for regulation, I find your arguments off the wall to say the least. CC

Author:	cabbyman [ Mon Mar 16, 2009 8:51 pm ]
Post subject:
Doom wrote: Why are you so issue more plates about things mate, do you own one or is it a case of you want one, or you just don't like anyone having anything that you don't? I'm curious as I registered last year but haven't posted until now because I don't really want any more forum life for myself, but you do read like one of those ppl who has to scratch a nice car because you ain't got one yourself. Put me straight on it I could be wrong. Are you one of those in Southampton who will suffer from the release of an additional 19 plates?

Author:	gusmac [ Mon Mar 16, 2009 9:29 pm ]
Post subject:
captain cab wrote: Doom, with the greatest respect, as many people on here will tell you, there is no greater advocate for regulated numbers than myself. However, even as an advocate for regulation, I find your arguments off the wall to say the least. CC Doom makes a great case for de-reg on his own, CC I wish others were as blatent.

Author:	toots [ Mon Mar 16, 2009 9:51 pm ]
Post subject:
I actually agree that numbers should be regulated. Managed regulation would be the best solution if it could be worked out, but, something needs to be done about selling the plates. As I understand it they're not theirs to sell

Author:	captain cab [ Mon Mar 16, 2009 9:52 pm ]
Post subject:
toots wrote: I actually agree that numbers should be regulated. Managed regulation would be the best solution if it could be worked out, but, something needs to be done about selling the plates. As I understand it they're not theirs to sell I paritally agree....which means we disagree....now theres a first CC

Author:	toots [ Mon Mar 16, 2009 9:54 pm ]
Post subject:
captain cab wrote: toots wrote: I actually agree that numbers should be regulated. Managed regulation would be the best solution if it could be worked out, but, something needs to be done about selling the plates. As I understand it they're not theirs to sell I paritally agree....which means we disagree....now theres a first CC And which part do you disagree with and there's a first time for everything

Author:	captain cab [ Mon Mar 16, 2009 9:55 pm ]
Post subject:
toots wrote: And which part do you disagree with and there's a first time for everything Selling the plates.....I dont agree with it.....but how is it going to stop given caselaw? CC

Page 1 of 3	All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/

Author:	toots [ Mon Mar 16, 2009 9:58 pm ]
Post subject:
captain cab wrote: toots wrote: And which part do you disagree with and there's a first time for everything Selling the plates.....I dont agree with it.....but how is it going to stop given caselaw? CC I'm going to regret asking what caselaw cos I don't know and you're going to send it so I can read it along with everything else I'm reading to educate myself with