That report has a few holes in it
CC
| Taxi Driver Online http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/ |
|
| Reading to take a year out. http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=11094 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Sussex [ Fri Mar 27, 2009 7:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Reading to take a year out. |
No new cabbies on rank for year No new black cab licences will be issued for a year in Reading following a plea from hard-up, overworked taxi drivers. Keith Johnson, chairman of the Reading Taxi Drivers’ Association, urged Reading Borough Council licensing committee to freeze the issuing of new taxi plates for three years. But councillors decided instead to halt the issuing of new licences for one year and then review the decision in a year’s time. Hackney Carriage drivers from across Reading were in the council chamber on Wednesday night to hear the decision. Chairman of the committee Councillor Jeanette Skeats revealed she had spent a day driving round with Mr Johnson on a fact-finding exercising which she described as “a real learning experience”. Mr Johnson’s case was that with 214 licensed Hackney Carriage drivers already plying their trade in Reading there was no room on the ranks for more. He described the present situation on the taxi ranks where drivers were already forced to circle the town centre two or three times before they could get a space on the rank, and said taxi drivers were now forced to work 70 to 80 hours a week to make a living. He went on: “I believe it is not in the public interest and that the public are put at risk in our view if drivers are working that long.” Mr Johnson said the recession was having an effect on the number of people taking cabs, but the real cause of the pressure was the marked increase in new licences – up 60 in the last year. In March 2007, Reading Borough Council removed the limit on the number of taxi licences on offer, but put a strict limit on the drivers allowed to apply. Mr Johnson produced an account of his “normal working day” – the day he took Cllr Skeats on the road – and revealed his gross earnings for the day with tips were just £65 for 10 jobs in nine hours and it had cost him £12 in diesel. Cllr Peter Jones wanted to know, given the cost of a new cab at £30,000 to £35,000 and the level of earnings described, “Who in the world, especially in the present climate, would want to apply for a taxi licence?” He said: “If you believe in market forces, then surely there is no need for us to limit the number of licences we issue.” Cllr Deborah Edwards proposed the one-year freeze on new licences and Cllr Skeats described the move as “a happy medium”. Other committee members agreed and also said they would allow any application already in the pipeline to proceed. Members were told the council would have to, by law, carry out a survey of drivers – costing £10,000 – if they decided to restrict the issuing of licences in this way. Drivers at the meeting acknowledged they would be expected to pay for the statutory survey through their annual licence fees if the issuing of licences was frozen. After the meeting Mr Johnson said: “We would have liked the council to stop issuing licences for three years, but this is something better than nothing. We hope that in a year’s time they will agree to do the same again.” |
|
| Author: | captain cab [ Fri Mar 27, 2009 9:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
That report has a few holes in it
CC |
|
| Author: | toots [ Mon Mar 30, 2009 11:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
captain cab wrote: That report has a few holes in it
CC Such as 
|
|
| Author: | captain cab [ Mon Mar 30, 2009 11:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
toots wrote: Such as A refusal is a refusal and the only reason to refuse an application is if the council are satisfied there is no significant unmet demand. Economics dont come into it.....just proving there isnt a demand. CC |
|
| Author: | toots [ Mon Mar 30, 2009 11:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
captain cab wrote: toots wrote: Such as A refusal is a refusal and the only reason to refuse an application is if the council are satisfied there is no significant unmet demand. Economics dont come into it.....just proving there isnt a demand. CC So they could stop and then somebody apply for a licence and challenge them. They would have to then prove there was no unmet demand by doing a survey? |
|
| Author: | captain cab [ Mon Mar 30, 2009 11:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
toots wrote: So they could stop and then somebody apply for a licence and challenge them. They would have to then prove there was no unmet demand by doing a survey? The act doesnt say survey.....just be satisfied theres no sud.......so basically yes....they must have some type of evidence to present to a court. CC |
|
| Author: | toots [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:00 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
captain cab wrote: toots wrote: So they could stop and then somebody apply for a licence and challenge them. They would have to then prove there was no unmet demand by doing a survey? The act doesnt say survey.....just be satisfied theres no sud.......so basically yes....they must have some type of evidence to present to a court. CC If they don't have a survey what other type of evidence is there
|
|
| Author: | captain cab [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:02 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
toots wrote: If they don't have a survey what other type of evidence is there Not sure.....I wouldnt recommend a mori poll......thats what started the stockport crisis
CC |
|
| Author: | toots [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:05 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
captain cab wrote: toots wrote: If they don't have a survey what other type of evidence is there Not sure.....I wouldnt recommend a mori poll......thats what started the stockport crisis CC What's a mori poll
|
|
| Author: | MR T [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:06 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
toots wrote: captain cab wrote: toots wrote: If they don't have a survey what other type of evidence is there Not sure.....I wouldnt recommend a mori poll......thats what started the stockport crisis CC What's a mori poll
|
|
| Author: | toots [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
MR T wrote: toots wrote: captain cab wrote: toots wrote: If they don't have a survey what other type of evidence is there Not sure.....I wouldnt recommend a mori poll......thats what started the stockport crisis CC What's a mori poll Yeah but he wears a blonde wig
|
|
| Author: | captain cab [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:11 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
toots wrote: Yeah but he wears a blonde wig no its grey |
|
| Author: | toots [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:14 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
captain cab wrote: toots wrote: Yeah but he wears a blonde wig no its grey Oh that must be show him as a wise old person then. What is a mori poll
|
|
| Author: | captain cab [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:20 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
toots wrote: captain cab wrote: toots wrote: Yeah but he wears a blonde wig no its grey Oh that must be show him as a wise old person then. What is a mori poll Its a poll of public opinion carried out by a firm called mori......they usually the ones who tell us which government is gonna win an election because they surveys 100 retarded people in Birmingham. CC |
|
| Author: | toots [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:23 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
captain cab wrote: toots wrote: captain cab wrote: toots wrote: Yeah but he wears a blonde wig no its grey Oh that must be show him as a wise old person then. What is a mori poll Its a poll of public opinion carried out by a firm called mori......they usually the ones who tell us which government is gonna win an election because they surveys 100 retarded people in Birmingham. CC Got it, thanks
|
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|