Anonymous wrote:
read the bloody page for gods sake
last colomn, method
RRO under consideration or primary legislation!
if only you would read the small print binnie.
Wharfie
Yes, I've read the small print Wharfy, and thought you might mention what you did, but I was a bit rushed at the time, so I didn't mention it.
But you said:
"cannot be done by order I do believe. if yo take a butchers at the RRA action plan it concedes this point."
How can you possibly say that it concedes that it can't be done by RRO?
The Action Plan says that the method of change could either be an RRO or primary legislation. How can you read this as saying that the Action Plan concedes that it can't be done by RRO? It can be done by primary legislation, that much is obvious, but I think the presumption should be that unless it specifically says otherwise in the Action Plan that it can't be done by RRO then the presumption should be that it can? Surely?
Anyway, the OFT report says at para 7.13:
"The Government's Action Plan 2002 contains a number of proposals to use the streamlined order-making procedure in the RRA to amend burdensome primary legislation. The DfT have put forward four actions affecting taxi and PHV regulation for completion by Regulatory Reform Order:
And you know the rest!
And I think the OFT will be better appraised of the position on this issue than you or I.
Dusty