Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Fri Mar 29, 2024 7:13 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 108 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Dec 01, 2003 5:40 pm 
In an article on the front and inside pages Mr Kavanagh gives an initial response from the T&G, under the headline "Superficial and Naive".

He points out, that in his view, the report has serious inadequacies, such as

i) The report doesn't assess or conclude; on the effects de-limitation would have on the PH trade. Would de-limitation lead to less licensed vehicles in the combined HC/PH fleet?

ii) He has serious concerns that at first the stats show that waiting times are less in restricted areas, but when further analyzed, the stats suddenly change to show that customers are in fact waiting longer in restricted areas.

iii) He points out that in Sheffield, despite the number of HCs rising by 50%, it only led to a 15 second reduction in customer waiting times.

His article finishes with comments saying that the government would be making a very grave mistake if it embraces the free-market madness advocated by the OFT report.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 01, 2003 6:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 53921
Location: 1066 Country
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.

I can't quite work out, having just read the article, why in it he doesn't mention the safety concerns that OFT high-lighted. :? :?

Surely the T&G must have some regard for customers safety, but then again perhaps they don't.

Again the T&G get so mixed up in their nonsense, that they not only do the Blair thing of saying one thing, yet doing another. This time they say one thing, then say the other.

Apparantly de-limit will lead to many more taxis, but less cars available. :? :? Doesn't less cars mean more work for those out there?

He also mentions 'the old chestnuts'. This from the person who digs out the same old rubbish time and time again. But when the stats given out by the OFT are based on facts, it's an old chestnut.

However if the T&G are happy to allow a million + people (at least once a year) get into un-licensed vehicles, then they should say so, not hide behind out dated legislation and dogmar.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 01, 2003 10:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2003 10:08 pm
Posts: 123
Location: Buckinghamshire
Who is Mr Kavanagh


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 01, 2003 10:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 53921
Location: 1066 Country
The mouth piece of the T&G's cab section.

Has he ever driven a HC or a PH?

I will give you as many guesses as you need, to say NO !!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 02, 2003 1:06 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2003 2:22 am
Posts: 110
Sussex Man wrote:
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.

However if the T&G are happy to allow a million + people (at least once a year) get into un-licensed vehicles, then they should say so, not hide behind out dated legislation and dogmar.


Hey!... Lets wipe out crime records and legalise every criminal activity.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 02, 2003 2:46 am 
Sussex Man wrote:
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.

I can't quite work out, having just read the article, why in it he doesn't mention the safety concerns that OFT high-lighted. :? :?

Surely the T&G must have some regard for customers safety, but then again perhaps they don't.

Again the T&G get so mixed up in their nonsense, that they not only do the Blair thing of saying one thing, yet doing another. This time they say one thing, then say the other.

Apparantly de-limit will lead to many more taxis, but less cars available. :? :? Doesn't less cars mean more work for those out there?

He also mentions 'the old chestnuts'. This from the person who digs out the same old rubbish time and time again. But when the stats given out by the OFT are based on facts, it's an old chestnut.

However if the T&G are happy to allow a million + people (at least once a year) get into un-licensed vehicles, then they should say so, not hide behind out dated legislation and dogmar.




Sussex,

hes one extreme you are the other, there is so much space between.

predjudiced both of you


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 02, 2003 9:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 53921
Location: 1066 Country
scanner wrote:
Hey!... Lets wipe out crime records and legalise every criminal activity.


No not wipe out criminal records, but stop the crime happening again in the future.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 02, 2003 9:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 53921
Location: 1066 Country
Anonymous wrote:
Sussex,

hes one extreme you are the other, there is so much space between.

predjudiced both of you


Spot on, but it's mainly the fault of those that govern us.

Still if we change the cause of the problem, the crazy them and us situation, then it may get better.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 02, 2003 9:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2003 6:09 pm
Posts: 1180
Location: Miles away from paradise, not far from hell.
It would be nice if any of the union's spokes-people could come on Taxi Driver Online, and put their points across to the trade.

They would be most welcome.

Alex

_________________
ʎɐqǝ uo pɹɐoqʎǝʞ ɐ ʎnq ı ǝɯıʇ ʇsɐן ǝɥʇ sı sıɥʇ

Simply the best taxi forum in the whole wide world. www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 02, 2003 11:20 pm 
Alex wrote:
It would be nice if any of the union's spokes-people could come on Taxi Driver Online, and put their points across to the trade.

They would be most welcome.

Alex


joking! welcome? from whome? Sussex?

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2003 1:51 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2003 2:22 am
Posts: 110
Sussex Man wrote:
scanner wrote:
Hey!... Lets wipe out crime records and legalise every criminal activity.


No not wipe out criminal records, but stop the crime happening again in the future.


I think that it has been suggested that there are a million illegal hirings and so inferred that this is because of the "lack" of plates. Thus, those illegal hirings could be made legal by a mass issue of licences.

So, to reduce the crime records... just legalise criminal activity.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2003 3:41 am 
OK. I am missing the point here or something.

If we are going to talk of the statistics of illegal hirings, and attacks upon customers from usually wholly unlicensed car drivers purporting to be cabs, then can we be clear that these are not attacks by "Taxi or PH Drivers" but actually, they are attacks by members of the general public pretending to be cab drivers.

Then, if we add the often unprovoked attacks on taxi and PH drivers by the general public, we can see that, statistically, it is the general public who are the dangerous criminals.

I thus repeat my call for full Enhanced CRB checks for all members of the general public.

Any member of the general public whom cannot produce a satisfactory CRB check, should thus be deported to France immediately, under the EU Freedom of Movement Directive.

Alternatively, just give everyone a Hackney plate, and you will immediately see that the proportionate crime figures will then reduce to a miniscule proportion.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2003 11:08 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2003 2:22 am
Posts: 110
My point was that it has been said ( in complete ignorance, & mostly in the media and also at least once on here) is that there are a lot of illegal hirings. Now we know that the majority of these are from bogus cabs. However, the solution given to this "problem", is to de-limit, thus cure this illegal actvity instead of actually tackling and prosecuting the offenders.

That is not to say that in some areas that there not should indeed be many more licensed taxis. In some areas I reckon there should be. But there should not be a blanket proposal which supposedly legalises illegal hirings. Ilegal hirings will continue no matter how many licenses are issued.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2003 3:39 pm 
scanner wrote:
My point was that it has been said ( in complete ignorance, & mostly in the media and also at least once on here) is that there are a lot of illegal hirings. Now we know that the majority of these are from bogus cabs. However, the solution given to this "problem", is to de-limit, thus cure this illegal actvity instead of actually tackling and prosecuting the offenders.

That is not to say that in some areas that there not should indeed be many more licensed taxis. In some areas I reckon there should be. But there should not be a blanket proposal which supposedly legalises illegal hirings. Ilegal hirings will continue no matter how many licenses are issued.


good try scanner there is a hell of a twist of facts there!

in fact the delimit proposals is about creating a free market.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2003 5:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:20 pm
Posts: 3272
Anonymous wrote:
Then, if we add the often unprovoked attacks on taxi and PH drivers by the general public, we can see that, statistically, it is the general public who are the dangerous criminals.




Nice one, Mr Guest.

One irony is that one of the biggest deterrents to driving a taxi at night is the general public (!), and this in turn leads to lack of availability and trouble on the streets and pick ups by PH and pirate cabs, with the OFT report acknowledging that police often turn a blind eye to this in the interests of public order.

Another interesting point in this regard is that the OFT didn't mention the new licensing laws, which should alleviate the situation late at night.

Or at least I don't think they mentioned it!

Dusty


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 108 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 51 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group