discombobulated cabbie wrote:
Why should somebody in a union come before someone who is not in a union?
When it comes to the support of the Union, as that was the loaded question which was asked. Are you perhaps suggesting that the Union should provide support without membership. Its the Unions membership that immediatly concerns the unions HOWEVER in the majority of cases changes in legislation, argued for by a the unions, have a beneficial effect on EVERYONE whether they be members or not.
discombobulated cabbie wrote:
Twice in my life I have been involved with unions, twice in my life I have been let down by the unions, in the later instance I fought and won the half a million pounds that the company had wriggled out of paying us.
We had to elect worker reps and we done a far better job than the union rep did, (well I did anyway) The thing that cheeses me off about these kind of situations is the fact that you are supposed to put your faith in some organisation or other without having any input purely because it is assumed by the vast majority that they know best and have everyones best intrests at heart this sadly is not always the case in my experience.
There are so many bodys representing so many intrests it's hard to see how anyone can reach a consensus on this issue.
This has been asked by many of the drivers in my local area, all I can say is that I publish a monthly newsletter detailing what action has been taken while following the branch memberships requests. These can be discussed at a bi-monthly meeting where new issues can be debated, voted upon then acted upon. If this doesn't happen in your area then I suggest that you join up and get things changed so that the Union works for the best interest of the majority of its members at branch level, which in turn relects what the Union does Nationally.
In short, if you feel as though no organisation is talking your language then start one yourselves, you can be sure that MANY others are thinking the same as you.
B. Lucky
