| Taxi Driver Online http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/ |
|
| free for all time http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=7368 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | 187ums [ Fri Nov 23, 2007 7:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | free for all time |
http://www.thisisoxford.co.uk/display.v ... strike.php |
|
| Author: | Sussex [ Fri Nov 23, 2007 7:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
There are already 83 hackney licences in Cherwell and the Cherwell Valley Hackney Association feels that the council's licensing department can not cope with this amount and that there would be an even greater problem if the licences were increased. Remind how much extra it would cost the council to license 103 cabs, or 153 cabs, over the existing 83.
And as Cherwell are looking to go to WAVs, how many extra cabs are going to be licensed anyway?
|
|
| Author: | JD [ Sat Dec 15, 2007 1:52 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Looking at the comments from the contributers I think they might have a hard time passing the english language test? lol Regards JD |
|
| Author: | GA [ Sat Dec 15, 2007 9:17 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I don't know why either. BUT I will bet that the number of staff within licensing doesn't increase to provide adequate enforcement when numbers increase. B. Lucky
|
|
| Author: | Sussex [ Sat Dec 15, 2007 8:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
GA wrote: BUT I will bet that the number of staff within licensing doesn't increase to provide adequate enforcement when numbers increase.
If there are more folks able to do legal pick ups then the council shouldn't need more enforcement staff, they should need a few less.
|
|
| Author: | jimbo [ Sun Dec 16, 2007 11:05 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Sussex wrote: GA wrote: BUT I will bet that the number of staff within licensing doesn't increase to provide adequate enforcement when numbers increase. If there are more folks able to do legal pick ups then the council shouldn't need more enforcement staff, they should need a few less. ![]() And if you believe that, you probably believe that de-classifying Cannabis led to a reduction in Crime rates. And I suppose you believe in Santa and the Easter Bunny too. |
|
| Author: | Tulsablue [ Sun Dec 16, 2007 11:35 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
jimbo wrote: And I suppose you believe in Santa What are you saying
|
|
| Author: | grandad [ Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Tulsablue wrote: jimbo wrote: And I suppose you believe in Santa What are you saying ![]() That's ruined my christmas now.
|
|
| Author: | gusmac [ Sun Dec 16, 2007 6:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
grandad wrote: Tulsablue wrote: jimbo wrote: And I suppose you believe in Santa What are you saying ![]() That's ruined my christmas now. ![]() Santa's ok. He lives just up the road from here. |
|
| Author: | JD [ Mon Dec 17, 2007 5:19 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I can't understand what all the fuss is about? I was under the impression the general concensus among quantity control restrictionists is that councillors know best? When we get a council thats wants to change its policy to what it sees as a benefit to the public, then these same individuals say, "councillors don't know best"? It would be nice to have a little consitency from these people. Regards Jd |
|
| Author: | 187ums [ Mon Dec 17, 2007 10:42 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
these boys have already been on strike, now they are talking about doing the same over new year |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|