Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Thu Apr 30, 2026 3:36 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2016 10:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
High Court judge backs revocation of licence for employment of illegal worker



A local authority has won an appeal to the High Court over its decision to revoke a premises licence after a restaurant employed an illegal worker.

A raid by the immigration authorities on Zara’s restaurant in East Lindsey had revealed that the owner, Mr Hanif, was employing the worker.

The police instigated review proceedings and the licensing authority revoked Hanif’s licence.

Hanif appealed successfully before a district judge. His legal team submitted that given he had received a civil penalty under s. 15 of the Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006, and had not been prosecuted under s. 21 for employing the illegal worker, the crime prevention objective was not engaged.

East Lindsey District Council appealed by way of case stated.

The authority’s legal team, Philip Kolvin QC of Cornerstone Barristers and David Dadds of Dadds LLP, argued that it was not necessary for a crime to have been reported, prosecuted or established in a court of law in order for the crime prevention objective to be engaged. The licensing objectives were prospective, and were concerned with the avoidance of harm in the future.

Mr Justice Jay upheld the council’s appeal and decided that remission of the case to the Magistrates’ Court was not appropriate.

The judge ordered Hanif to pay costs in the High Court in the sum of £15,000 and ordered costs of the Magistrates' proceedings in the sum of £4,000.

East Lindsey’s Portfolio Holder for Licensing, Cllr Nick Guyatt, said: “The employment of illegal workers is a social evil, which this council will play its part in combatting, since it leads to exploitation of workers, fraud on the Revenue, unfair competitive advantage to the employer and an association with illegal trafficking.

“The council’s decision to revoke this licence has been vindicated and upheld, which the council hopes will send a clear message to any licensees who break the law by employing workers illegally.”

Philip Kolvin QC and David Dadds appeared for East Lindsey District Council, instructed by Dadds LLP.

source: http://www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/ ... &Itemid=29

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2016 5:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 7:24 pm
Posts: 6755
captain cab wrote:
High Court judge backs revocation of licence for employment of illegal worker



A local authority has won an appeal to the High Court over its decision to revoke a premises licence after a restaurant employed an illegal worker.

A raid by the immigration authorities on Zara’s restaurant in East Lindsey had revealed that the owner, Mr Hanif, was employing the worker.

The police instigated review proceedings and the licensing authority revoked Hanif’s licence.

Hanif appealed successfully before a district judge. His legal team submitted that given he had received a civil penalty under s. 15 of the Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006, and had not been prosecuted under s. 21 for employing the illegal worker, the crime prevention objective was not engaged.

East Lindsey District Council appealed by way of case stated.

The authority’s legal team, Philip Kolvin QC of Cornerstone Barristers and David Dadds of Dadds LLP, argued that it was not necessary for a crime to have been reported, prosecuted or established in a court of law in order for the crime prevention objective to be engaged. The licensing objectives were prospective, and were concerned with the avoidance of harm in the future.

Mr Justice Jay upheld the council’s appeal and decided that remission of the case to the Magistrates’ Court was not appropriate.

The judge ordered Hanif to pay costs in the High Court in the sum of £15,000 and ordered costs of the Magistrates' proceedings in the sum of £4,000.

East Lindsey’s Portfolio Holder for Licensing, Cllr Nick Guyatt, said: “The employment of illegal workers is a social evil, which this council will play its part in combatting, since it leads to exploitation of workers, fraud on the Revenue, unfair competitive advantage to the employer and an association with illegal trafficking.

“The council’s decision to revoke this licence has been vindicated and upheld, which the council hopes will send a clear message to any licensees who break the law by employing workers illegally.”

Philip Kolvin QC and David Dadds appeared for East Lindsey District Council, instructed by Dadds LLP.

source: http://www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/ ... &Itemid=29


WOW thats dynamite if it applys to PH proprietors in london many of whom use illegals in their offices and in Cars posing as someone else ............bring it on =D>

_________________
All posts by this contributor are made in a strictly personal capacity

I AM PROUD TO BE A CITIZEN NOBODY'S SUBJECT http://www.republic.org.u

F88K EM ALL WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND

BOOZE BOOZE BOOZE


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2016 6:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24391
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
1 down.....

_________________
Of all the things ive lost, i miss my mind the most


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 151 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group