mancityfan wrote:
They just pluck a figure out of the Sky.
I questioned them once about the price of a 3 year badge which is £250 + a CRB every year and a DVLA licence check every year =£370 over the border in Mansfield a 3 year badge is £150. The head of licensing was trying to tell me that Ashfield was on par with Mansfield. He soon changed his mind when I Emailed him a copy of Mansfield's badge fees which clearly shows £150 for a 3 year badge.
Who ever is representing Mansfield? Is doing a very good job, you need him in Ashfield, since there fees have been challenged there has been no increase, and no increase for the next year, surely you must no him? Perhaps for a small fee he will help you.
http://www.mansfield.gov.uk/CMADattachm ... tefees.doc[/quote]
No one is representing them in Mansfield. They've got a decent Council that's all.[/quote]
Your wrong, this tells me different? Wow no increase since 2007 and a reduction in 2014. Whose representing the Ashfield trade.?
Report of Licensing Team Leader
To
LICENSING COMMITTEE
On
13TH MARCH, 2007
LOCAL GOVERNMENT (MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) ACT 1976 – SECTION 70 – OBJECTION TO PROPOSED INCREASE IN LICENSING FEES FOR 2007/08
1.SUMMARY
This report provides details of an objection received to the Council’s proposed revised scale of fees and charges in relation to hackney carriages, private hire vehicles and operator licences.
2.RECOMMENDATION
Recommendation to Council
To be determined as presented.
3.BACKGROUND
3.1In accordance with statutory requirements the Council’s proposed fees and charges for the grant of vehicle and operator licences effective from 1st April, 2007 have been advertised in the Mansfield Chad newspaper. Appendix 1 refers.
3.2In accordance with the timescales allowed within the legislation an objection has been received from the Chairman of the Mansfield Hackney Carriage and Private Hire Association. The ground for the objection is that “the fees to be charged by the Council are excessive and unreasonable in the context of the Act”. The objection letter is appended at Appendix 2.
3.3The Chairman of the Association states in his letter that a more detailed statement of the grounds for objection would be submitted. This detail has been received. Appendix 3 refers.
3.4.1The approved budget for taxi licensing for the year 2007/8 currently indicates an estimated £3,800 surplus of income over expenditure. Appendix 4 refers. However, the latest forecast outturn for the year 2006/7 shows an estimated income of £79,158 with a consequent loss of £10,801 therefore it is likely that the estimates for the year 2007/8 have been overstated.
3.4.2The budget shows a staff allocation of 2.49 full time equivalent which is lower than the 3.75 full time equivalent posts within the financial estimates for the year 2006/7.
3.4.3Figures from the Council’s Financial Services Section show a loss on the budget for the years 2004/5 of £7,078 and a loss of £2,541 for the year 2005/6 together with an anticipated predicted loss of £10,801 for this financial year. Appendix 5 refers.
3.4.4As a consequence of this a decision has been taken to leave one full time equivalent post unfilled with a view to maintaining a more balanced budget over a period of time.
3.4.5The effect of this will be to change the comparative data table in the submission by the Chairman of the Mansfield Hackney Carriage and Private Hire Association to:-[/quote]
An Association which represents about 10 drivers (all Private Hire drivers) isn't a force to be reckoned with is it?