JD wrote:
Gateshead Angel wrote:
JD wrote:
Yorkie wrote:
by the way John I have an unwanted christmas present, do you think the reemergence of charlie could be sold on e-bay?
I new if Charlie was to be spotted around these parts again it would probably be you or TDO who did the spotting. I think it's ironic that so soon after Charlie's demise up pops one of his alleged pseudonyms. lol
However I'm all for free speech so if the person in question has anything constructive to offer apart from the usual nonsense about private hire and unmet demand then I'm sure he may get a reasoned response.
Best wishes
JD
Thank you for allowing me access to these forums Mr Button.
Many people claim that I have been a multitude of other people but that was only done to defect from their own "multi" membership, people assuming that others do as they do.
It has been the source of much amusement leading up to Christmas, calling people "Mick" just cause they have a differant opinion has had me rolling around laughing, it shows how afraid of argument some members are.
The fast tan salesman statements were the funniest.
So, as this sites main function is to identify members true identity I'm sure you won't have a problem with being identified yourself.
B. Lucky

It doesn't concern me in the least who you are or what you post under, as long as you had something intelligent to say. If you signed yourself Mickey Mouse it wouldn't bother me in the least. What does bother me is the tripe that came from Charlie's keyboard. I stopped responding to Charlie because of his contradictions and inconsistencies along with his inability to grasp the basics of reality. You may not be aware but you and Charlie have some alarming similarities, perhaps that is more than a coincidence?
If you are Charlie then I can't understand why you tried to carry off a lie. The only persons who would know for sure are the administrators of this site because they alone have access to the fingerprints you leave behind every time you post a message.
It is child's play to trace an IP and it is just as easy to get all the info about your machine once an IP is known. If the admin of this site really wanted to be ungracious they could easily post the machine details of both you and Charlie.
However, you know that is highly improbable because they practice a code of conduct. Unless Charlie is extremely clever and has access to several computers and several ISP accounts I suspect the admin already know the details of Charlie and any aliases he may or may not have.
As for me, my nick is consistent and never changes. I don't need to know the personal life of a member in order to reply to their point of view. Likewise I don't need to know who a person is if they need my help in any way.
Best wishes
JD
thats clear enough, but the inconsistencies were identical on both pen names it was uncanny,
And also when Charlie got his head in the railings who popped up?
well John, I believe we should assist one another, this aint a war its a trade however some like Michael resent that help, not just reject it resent it
Mick, thinks I hate him, how the hell could that be? never knowingly met the man and if we worked together, we would probably make a strong partnership
but we dont and I resent his behaviour like publishing information given to him in confidence.
there we are, Charlie? that felt Mick saying what otherwise he dare not say.