Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Tue Apr 28, 2026 4:29 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 63 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 09, 2003 11:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57343
Location: 1066 Country
Also didn't someone say something about a meeting in the new year between the DfT and the Limo people, to sort out the whole limo mess?

Oh yeah, it was me. :D

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 10, 2003 8:47 am 
I wonder if the fire-brigade's union are going to get an invite? :wink:


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 10, 2003 1:14 pm 
Whats the next thing, travel in style on a milk float??? :D :D :D :D I hope these fire engines have hire and reward insurance. Somehow I doubt it.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: fire engine
PostPosted: Wed Dec 10, 2003 5:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:20 pm
Posts: 3272
Tulsablue wrote:

Taxi's should have first priority to do what they are good at, without worrying about other forms of transport that have no connection or effect on their business .
What is 99% of your business :?:




As I said I don't think I'm in direct competition with a fire engine or similar, but I think it's indicative of the inadequacies and inconsistencies in regulation at present, and if I'm not in direct competion with any unlicensed service then there are plenty of people who are, and it's this kind of unfair competition that we're trying to highlight, not to mention the public safety aspect.

I'm perplexed by your attitude Mr Blue, if someone was competing in your sector by avoiding regulation that you adhere to or exploiting some legal loophole then would you dismiss it as a 'good idea'? No, I don't think so, and quite right too!

And you also seem to be saying that it's irrelevant because it's on a small scale, but I'll bet they said that about London touting at one point.

The problem with things of these type it takes some incident to happen before the authorities take an interest, or the problem is left to get out of control and then the enforcement agencies then complain that they don't have the rescources to do anything about it.

Dusty


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: fire engine
PostPosted: Wed Dec 10, 2003 5:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:20 pm
Posts: 3272
Tulsablue wrote:
Can't licence a Galaxy, is this fact or fiction :? that just gets embellished.


I get the distinct impression that you don't believe me Mr Blue, but there was a major issue with the licensing of Ford Galaxies at Manchester Airport and other places I believe, perhaps someone else has the details.

But there are hundred of different authorities in the UK with hundreds of different rules for vehicles, not to mention drivers, fares etc.

For example, common rules include those relating to vehicle dimensions in various respects, engine size, vehicle colour, vehicle age etc.

In some areas to run a taxi all you need is a ten-year-old Nissan Sunny (say) whereas in others you need a brand new £30k black cab.

So is the Ford Galaxy example really that remarkable and unbelievable?

Dusty


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 11, 2003 9:07 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2003 6:09 pm
Posts: 1180
Location: Miles away from paradise, not far from hell.
I don't think the problem with the Galaxys relate to the vehicle itself. It was how many seats councils would allow them to be licensed for.

Alex

_________________
ʎɐqǝ uo pɹɐoqʎǝʞ ɐ ʎnq ı ǝɯıʇ ʇsɐן ǝɥʇ sı sıɥʇ

Simply the best taxi forum in the whole wide world. www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: fire engines
PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2003 12:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2003 9:39 am
Posts: 400
Location: Manchester Airport
Well done Dusty :D
we get to the real issue at last.
THE problem with fire engine and stretch limo is the councils and licence people bury their head in the sand.
We can collectively force them to LICENCE them if we complain properly in the right place using the right methods. But lets not complain about colleauges in the HC or PH sectors that are licenced and for the most part do a good job. I do use taxi's on occassion and recently went to the second vehicle on the "rank" because the first driver I remembered from a couple of weeks earlier, drives like an idiot, it caused some uproar nu I am the customer :)
Limo's fire engine, milk float, airport transfers, they are all good ideas. that the public want, this is proved by their using them.
There is no reason why any licence authority cannot licence any type of vehicle if they want to, take for instance the American Yellow School Bus.
This vehicle does not meet most of the UK C & U regulations yet the DoT gave it a derogation to see if it will work. In practice the idea with it is good the only difference is we could paint our own vehicles yellow and acheive the same.
Keep up the discussion's and broaden the scope of our horizons


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2003 6:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:20 pm
Posts: 3272
Well said Mr Blue - believe me I don't have problem with particular vehicles being licensed, but that's subject to them meeting safety criteria and suchlike - but I think that if the authorities just ignore the problem then that's obviously not what they should be doing.

And the point about the Ford Galaxy was just to demonstrate the inconsistencies throughout the country - why should it be suitable as a six seater in my manor, but is only allowed to be used as a large estate car in others. And why should some LAs ask for the tinted windows to be removed when they're OK in my manor and others?

It's not logical.

While the authorities don't seem to want national standards, the irony is that the Disability Discrimination Act spec for vehicles will be the most national and prescriptive measure in the trade ever.

Dusty


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: fire engines
PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2003 6:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:20 pm
Posts: 3272
Tulsablue wrote:
We can collectively force them to LICENCE them if we complain properly in the right place using the right methods. But lets not complain about colleauges in the HC or PH sectors that are licenced and for the most part do a good job. I do use taxi's on occassion and recently went to the second vehicle on the "rank" because the first driver I remembered from a couple of weeks earlier, drives like an idiot, it caused some uproar nu I am the customer :)


Did you read the article in PHM last year (?) about the stretch limos?

I think that demonstrates some of the problesm that the authorities face and, of course, they tend to move at a snail's pace.

BTW, I think that if you didn't take the first car in my manor no one would bat an eyelid - during some periods the vast majority of fares come of whatever bit of the rank customers happen to be closest to - I've occasionaly been first of half a dozen or so cars and the last to get a fare!

Dusty


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 18, 2003 4:34 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2003 12:16 am
Posts: 95
Location: Gateshead / Newcastle
The PHM article can also be viewed on http://www.streamlinetaxis202020.com. Click on Limousine warning. 8) 8) 8)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 19, 2003 6:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2003 6:09 pm
Posts: 1180
Location: Miles away from paradise, not far from hell.
Lets all hope and pray that something will eventually be done, to make these bloody things safe.

Alex

_________________
ʎɐqǝ uo pɹɐoqʎǝʞ ɐ ʎnq ı ǝɯıʇ ʇsɐן ǝɥʇ sı sıɥʇ

Simply the best taxi forum in the whole wide world. www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 20, 2003 3:53 pm 
Makes you wonder why people bother getting FX4's and the like...... when you could just buy an out of date "appliance".

Just think,

You could come home from the boozer IN AN AMBULANCE !!!!!! or

Go out to dinner IN A DUSTBIN LORRY !!!!!!!!!!!!


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 21, 2003 2:35 pm 
Look at the companies who do the school contracts, they go out and but old Leyland National buses for £400 keep them on the road for a year then scrap them. I bet the company gets £400 per week from the education department. Not bad profit is it?????????????


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 21, 2003 7:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2003 6:09 pm
Posts: 1180
Location: Miles away from paradise, not far from hell.
More evidence that it's far simpler for the powers that be, to keep an eye on those that do the job fairly, than give a stuff about those that don't play by the rules.

We have to wonder, why we bother?

Alex

_________________
ʎɐqǝ uo pɹɐoqʎǝʞ ɐ ʎnq ı ǝɯıʇ ʇsɐן ǝɥʇ sı sıɥʇ

Simply the best taxi forum in the whole wide world. www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 29, 2003 9:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:20 pm
Posts: 3272
Anonymous wrote:
Makes you wonder why people bother getting FX4's and the like...... when you could just buy an out of date "appliance".

Go out to dinner IN A DUSTBIN LORRY !!!!!!!!!!!!


Sounds like there might be a market for me there!

By the way, I thought the FX4 WAS an "out of date appliance"!

Dusty :)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 63 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 662 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group