Quote:
Considering that driving people from A to B safely is a major part of this occupation I personally wouldn't think you a fit and proper person with your obvious disregard to road safety and the law. With regard to the other driver only receiving a longer suspension I think the council have done a dis-service to the public as that driver also shows obvious disregard to road safety and the law. The other driver that assaulted a police officer may have been stupid and disrespectful but it is hardly dangerous behaviour is it. This of course is only my opinion
I'm interested by some of these reponses.I d have regard fr road safety and think i have a good record to portray that.I have only ever had one minor accident that was claimed against my insurance when i was about 21 years old ( i am now 46 ) so that is it on 29 years of driving,not bad eh?
The speeding offences were all doing 40mph in a 30 limit on good weather and woth not a soul in sight,reckless driving?
As i said why and how does another driver only receive a 21 day ban,does the inconsistency not concern anyone here??
As for the assault on a police officer....well thats where we differ,i think and know its a very serious offence and shows a propensity to violence,i would consider this person to be potentially dangerous,damn right.
How about the other numerous cases of hackney and private hire drivers driving without insurance,they get away with a 5 day suspension,this is responsible??
I sense here some people are on their high horse because they are not in this position,but just wait until you get yourself in difficulties,then we will see some bleating going on.
I dont believe it is right to take away someones livelihood for minor speeding offences,sorry thats bullshit.Obviously there need to be controls,but they could have taken lots of other actions,a revoation was totally unecessarry in my opinion.