Taxi Driver Online :: View topic - Legal eagle help please

I hope it's not the one that's managed by the local T&G man. [-X

Sussex wrote:
I hope it's not the one that's managed by the local T&G man.

Got it in one.

Iraqi Information Ministe wrote:
Then it is legal

What a good question.

Quote:

Iraqi Information Ministe wrote:
Then it is legal

What a good question.

It was not a question, it was an answer. Lying is forbidden in the T&G. Mr Kavanagh will tolerate nothing but truthfulness as he is a man of great honor and integrity. Everyone is encouraged to speak freely of the truths evidenced in their eyes and hearts.

Iraq Information Minister wrote:

Quote:

Iraqi Information Ministe wrote:
Then it is legal

What a good question.

Mmmm you sound very familiar :roll:

Iraqi Information Ministe wrote:

Then it is legal

What a good question. :-k

The London wording is slightly different from the rest of us, but in London it is at the moment legal. However the DfT are trying to make it illegal. $\:D/$

For the rest of us, it's legal until a court says it isn't, which pretty well sums up the 1976 Act. :sad:

But there could be light at the end of the tunnel. $\:D/$

I can't see how the DfT can sort out the London problem, without at the same time sorting out the 1976 Act problem. An announcement may be due soon. :wink:

Quote:

Iraqi Information Ministe wrote:
Then it is legal

What a good question.

Sussex why you are replying to postings from this contributor is anyones guess?

Yorkie wrote:

Sussex why you are replying to postings from this contributor is anyones guess?

I'm replying not just to him, but to anyone who wants to read the reply.

Author:	Guest [ Sat Jan 29, 2005 2:38 pm ]
Post subject:	Legal eagle help please
A local firm runs executive cars but doesnt license them. They say they are run under the 1976 exemption. But I thought that was for contract work only. What they do is sign up the posh cars to a contract with the cab firm for a year or so. So any work is just for the cab firm. Is this right?

Author:	Yorkie [ Sat Jan 29, 2005 2:43 pm ]
Post subject:
yes it probably is right, rules are there to be followed and they are following it to the letter and they can even have peodephiles as drivers too.

Author:	Sussex [ Sat Jan 29, 2005 8:16 pm ]
Post subject:
As the editor of PHM says hmmmmmmmm !! I think the current view is that for any exemption under section 75(1) (b), the contract must be for a specific vehicle (one contract = one vehicle), not one vehicle doing many different exempt contracts, the contract should have a defined lenght that must be more than seven days, and should also have a specific notice period of termination. To answer your question Mr Cgull, I think your local operator is taking the p***. I hope it's not the one that's managed by the local T&G man.

Author:	Guest [ Sat Jan 29, 2005 10:50 pm ]
Post subject:
Sussex wrote: I hope it's not the one that's managed by the local T&G man. Got it in one.

Author:	Comical Ali [ Sat Jan 29, 2005 11:37 pm ]
Post subject:
Quote: Sussex wrote: I hope it's not the one that's managed by the local T&G man. Got it in one. Then it is legal

Taxi Driver Online http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/

Legal eagle help please http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=1449	Page 1 of 2

Author:	Sussex [ Sun Jan 30, 2005 5:57 pm ]
Post subject:
Iraqi Information Ministe wrote: Then it is legal What a good question. The London wording is slightly different from the rest of us, but in London it is at the moment legal. However the DfT are trying to make it illegal. $\:D/$ For the rest of us, it's legal until a court says it isn't, which pretty well sums up the 1976 Act. But there could be light at the end of the tunnel. $\:D/$ I can't see how the DfT can sort out the London problem, without at the same time sorting out the 1976 Act problem. An announcement may be due soon.

Author:	Comical Ali [ Sun Jan 30, 2005 7:18 pm ]
Post subject:
Quote: Iraqi Information Ministe wrote: Then it is legal What a good question. It was not a question, it was an answer. Lying is forbidden in the T&G. Mr Kavanagh will tolerate nothing but truthfulness as he is a man of great honor and integrity. Everyone is encouraged to speak freely of the truths evidenced in their eyes and hearts.

Author:	Nidge2 [ Sun Jan 30, 2005 7:45 pm ]
Post subject:
Iraq Information Minister wrote: Quote: Iraqi Information Ministe wrote: Then it is legal What a good question. It was not a question, it was an answer. Lying is forbidden in the T&G. Mr Kavanagh will tolerate nothing but truthfulness as he is a man of great honor and integrity. Everyone is encouraged to speak freely of the truths evidenced in their eyes and hearts. Mmmm you sound very familiar

Author:	Gateshead Angel [ Sun Jan 30, 2005 9:09 pm ]
Post subject:
Nidge wrote: Iraq Information Minister wrote: Quote: Iraqi Information Ministe wrote: Then it is legal What a good question. It was not a question, it was an answer. Lying is forbidden in the T&G. Mr Kavanagh will tolerate nothing but truthfulness as he is a man of great honor and integrity. Everyone is encouraged to speak freely of the truths evidenced in their eyes and hearts. Mmmm you sound very familiar He should do Nidge, just like all the other pricks. B. Lucky

Author:	Comical Ali [ Sun Jan 30, 2005 9:31 pm ]
Post subject:
Search for the truth. I tell you. I do not believe an official of the T&G would do this! This is nothing more than an attack on the union. I ask you, would either of you permit this to happen where you are?

Author:	Yorkie [ Sun Jan 30, 2005 9:47 pm ]
Post subject:
Sussex wrote: Iraqi Information Ministe wrote: Then it is legal What a good question. The London wording is slightly different from the rest of us, but in London it is at the moment legal. However the DfT are trying to make it illegal. $\:D/$ For the rest of us, it's legal until a court says it isn't, which pretty well sums up the 1976 Act. But there could be light at the end of the tunnel. $\:D/$ I can't see how the DfT can sort out the London problem, without at the same time sorting out the 1976 Act problem. An announcement may be due soon. Sussex why you are replying to postings from this contributor is anyones guess, hes accusing everyone of being liars clearly hes a lyer whay is he still on?

Author:	Yorkie [ Sun Jan 30, 2005 9:50 pm ]
Post subject:
Iraq Information Minister wrote: Quote: Iraqi Information Ministe wrote: Then it is legal What a good question. It was not a question, it was an answer. Lying is forbidden in the T&G. Mr Kavanagh will tolerate nothing but truthfulness as he is a man of great honor and integrity. Everyone is encouraged to speak freely of the truths evidenced in their eyes and hearts. kin ell, I am a member even I cant believe all he says, but hes no lyer just terribly advised.

Author:	Sussex [ Sun Jan 30, 2005 10:05 pm ]
Post subject:
Yorkie wrote: Sussex why you are replying to postings from this contributor is anyones guess? I'm replying not just to him, but to anyone who wants to read the reply.

Author:	Yorkie [ Sun Jan 30, 2005 10:12 pm ]
Post subject:
Sussex wrote: Yorkie wrote: Sussex why you are replying to postings from this contributor is anyones guess? I'm replying not just to him, but to anyone who wants to read the reply. how refereshing an answer, you did it for me?

Author:	Comical Ali [ Sun Jan 30, 2005 10:28 pm ]
Post subject:
Yesterday we heard the man called Cgull. He, of course, is a driver. He said, more or less, that the T&G man and his mercenaries, were running illegally. You answered that they are probably legal. The licensing officers are in position to deal with these people if they are acting illegally. It was claimed that the person operating the union was involved in this operation. I say that the unions position is such that his members would not permit such a misappropriation. You then went on to insult me, you are not worth an old shoe.

Page 1 of 2	All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/