JD wrote:
Skull wrote:
[b]Anyone know about the new challenge for Taxi License Plates at Edinburgh Council?

What's the SP in Edinburgh and have you any idea on what grounds the challenge is based?
Best wishes
JD
Pity someone wouldn't challenge the corporate license scam they have up there, which I looked into a couple of years ago.
The Scottish legislation doesn't allow transfers, so there were no premium as per Liverpool, Halifax etc.
So some lawyers dreamt up this idea, which was remarkably simple - the seller gives up the plate, and the council issues a new one in the name of the buyer. Good that!
Well it might have been in some cases, but it was a bit more complex than that - instead they set up some kind of company or partership for the new license - which perhaps not only made the process look less blatantly unfair, but also ensured that even in future the license could be transferred without requiring another swap.
Of course, I've rambled on about this before, but it seems that there could be a basis for a legal challenge, since those waiting for a plate may have a 'legitimate expectation' that they aren't queue-jumped in this way. But this may depend on whether a waiting list is kept - if there's no list then there can't be an LE, if there is then there can be. So I believe some LAs who operate these scams have simply gotten rid of waiting lists to ensure they can't be challenged on the basis of a LE, but I wonder how a court would view this if challenged - of course the whole thing is just a big scam, and it seems further unfair if LAs can just abolish a waiting list to get round any challenge.
Then of course there's our old friend the abuse of a dominant position under EU law, which would be an interesting basis for challenge anywhere, but particularly in the likes of Edinburgh.
But the challenge is more likely to be just on the usual basis
Incidentally, it's worth recalling that when the review of the legislation in Scotland was announced, the 'Task Group' managed to not even mention restricted numbers, never mind the corporate licenses.
Their recently issued follow up document does mention the issue, but unsurprisingly sweeps it all under the carpet.
It even proposes fully legalising transfers. I'm surprised people like Jim Taylor have never mentioned this on the Fastblacks forum, since he clearly doesn't like the likes of Mr Greenhalgh making a crust as an intermediary in the whole scam, which wouldn't be necessary if the transfers were legalised.