Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Fri May 01, 2026 4:04 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jun 23, 2011 10:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Posts: 8119
Location: A Villa in Aston NO MORE!
http://www.birmingham.gov.uk/cs/Satelli ... ineWrapper

AND THEN;

https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/326DTY7

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 24, 2011 7:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
Brummie Cabbie wrote:

Should anyone be shocked that the council know nothing about insurance law?

Cos if they did then they wouldn't have repeated the not insured line in question 2. ](*,)

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 24, 2011 8:28 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
I have completed their survey and made a comment about the insurance. Maybe they may get the message if we all do the same.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 24, 2011 11:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Scotland
grandad wrote:
I have completed their survey and made a comment about the insurance. Maybe they may get the message if we all do the same.


So have I :D
In fact I suggested fitting calendar controlled meters,set to the councils rates, and making them paint the vehicles yellow, and to show large door stickers with pre book only without phone numbers :D


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 25, 2011 5:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Posts: 8119
Location: A Villa in Aston NO MORE!
Sussex wrote:
Brummie Cabbie wrote:

Should anyone be shocked that the council know nothing about insurance law?

Cos if they did then they wouldn't have repeated the not insured line in question 2. ](*,)

The insurance angle is due to the Courts finding drivers guilty of illegally plying for hire and fining them for no insurance, which really should be for not having VALID insurance for plying for hire, which they don't have.

The councillors are only abiding by the Courts' decisions.

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 25, 2011 5:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Posts: 8119
Location: A Villa in Aston NO MORE!
skippy41 wrote:
grandad wrote:
I have completed their survey and made a comment about the insurance. Maybe they may get the message if we all do the same.

So have I :D
In fact I suggested fitting calendar controlled meters,set to the councils rates, and making them paint the vehicles yellow, and to show large door stickers with pre book only without phone numbers :D

FFS Mr Skippy41!!!

By the time you've finished, we'll all be f*cked in Brum!!

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 25, 2011 7:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
Brummie Cabbie wrote:
The insurance angle is due to the Courts finding drivers guilty of illegally plying for hire and fining them for no insurance, which really should be for not having VALID insurance for plying for hire, which they don't have.

The councillors are only abiding by the Courts' decisions.

The survey says customers are not insured, that's not the truth.

All customers are covered even if the driver hasn't got any insurance.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 25, 2011 8:04 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
Brummie Cabbie wrote:
Sussex wrote:
Brummie Cabbie wrote:

Should anyone be shocked that the council know nothing about insurance law?

Cos if they did then they wouldn't have repeated the not insured line in question 2. ](*,)

The insurance angle is due to the Courts finding drivers guilty of illegally plying for hire and fining them for no insurance, which really should be for not having VALID insurance for plying for hire, which they don't have.

The councillors are only abiding by the Courts' decisions.


If the question was relating to the driver or the vehicle, then they would be correct. The question is relating to the customer and in that case it is incorrect.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 02, 2011 10:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Posts: 8119
Location: A Villa in Aston NO MORE!
The first question on this online survey reads;

Did you know that a Private Hire driver commits a criminal offence if they take a passenger who has not booked a journey in advance through the driver's Private Hire Company (plying for hire)?

Is it?

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 02, 2011 7:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
Brummie Cabbie wrote:
Is it?

Yes.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 5:14 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2011 6:51 am
Posts: 104
Sussex wrote:
Brummie Cabbie wrote:
Is it?

Yes.

Does this mean Taxi landlines diverted to PH mobiles with non operator driving/answering is also illegal?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 7:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
Nemisis wrote:
Does this mean Taxi landlines diverted to PH mobiles with non operator driving/answering is also illegal?

IMO diverts are legal, as long as the diverting operator base has a license.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 11:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Posts: 8119
Location: A Villa in Aston NO MORE!
Sussex wrote:
Brummie Cabbie wrote:
Is it?

Yes.

So I proved to myself yesterday.

I always thought that illegal plying for hire was a civil offence.

Oh, well!! You learn something new every day!!

Which now distinctly begs the question; if illegal plying for hire is a criminal offence, why don't the police get much more involved in this and on arresting the suspect take their DNA as they are allowed to do now?

It might help solve some other crimes!!

This was muted as long ago as 27th November 2003.

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 5:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
Brummie Cabbie wrote:
Which now distinctly begs the question; if illegal plying for hire is a criminal offence, why don't the police get much more involved in this and on arresting the suspect take their DNA as they are allowed to do now?

Because councils have delegation to do the criminal prosecutions.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 6:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Posts: 8119
Location: A Villa in Aston NO MORE!
Sussex wrote:
Brummie Cabbie wrote:
Which now distinctly begs the question; if illegal plying for hire is a criminal offence, why don't the police get much more involved in this and on arresting the suspect take their DNA as they are allowed to do now?

Because councils have delegation to do the criminal prosecutions.

Since when and under which legislation?

Because our lot clearly state that prosecutions for touting MUST be done by the police.

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 275 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group