Taxi Driver Online
http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/

Base...
http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=24680
Page 1 of 2

Author:  wannabeeahack [ Mon Jul 07, 2014 11:43 am ]
Post subject:  Base...

Does a hack only base need any licence from a LA and MUST it be inside any particular LA?

Author:  captain cab [ Mon Jul 07, 2014 12:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Base...

wannabeeahack wrote:
Does a hack only base need any licence from a LA


No

Author:  grandad [ Mon Jul 07, 2014 1:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Base...

captain cab wrote:
wannabeeahack wrote:
Does a hack only base need any licence from a LA


No

That is a good one. I say that because from when our council supposedly adopted the 1976 act until about 12 years ago the hackney drivers here were told that in order to take a job on the phone, they needed an operators license............and the tvvats paid for them. =D> =D> =D> =D>

Author:  wannabeeahack [ Mon Jul 07, 2014 1:39 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Base...

I live in a grey area close to my LA and another, a base here COOULD (in theory) do "double duty" to 2 areas legally i think, jus avoiding the use of any PH vehicles plated out of our LA

Author:  captain cab [ Mon Jul 07, 2014 2:09 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Base...

grandad wrote:
That is a good one. I say that because from when our council supposedly adopted the 1976 act until about 12 years ago the hackney drivers here were told that in order to take a job on the phone, they needed an operators license............and the tvvats paid for them. =D> =D> =D> =D>


It was always a 50/50 thing - but the brentwood vs gladden judgement cleared it up.

If you read section 80 of the 76 act it defines what a operator is -

“operate” means in the course of business to make provision for the invitation or acceptance of bookings for a private hire vehicle;

“operator’s licence” means a licence under section 55 of this Act;

section 55 Licensing of operators of private hire vehicles.

(1) Subject to the provisions of this Part of this Act, a district council shall, on receipt of an application from any person for the grant to that person of a licence to operate private hire vehicles grant to that person an operator’s licence:

Provided that a district council shall not grant a licence unless they are satisfied that the applicant is a fit and proper person to hold an operator’s licence.

(2) Every licence granted under this section shall remain in force for such period, not being longer than five years, as a district council may specify in the licence.

(3) A district council may attach to the grant of a licence under this section such conditions as they may consider reasonably necessary.

(4) Any applicant aggrieved by the refusal of a district council to grant an operator’s licence under this section, or by any conditions attached to the grant of such a licence, may appeal to a magistrates’ court.

Author:  wannabeeahack [ Mon Jul 07, 2014 4:34 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Base...

captain cab wrote:
grandad wrote:
That is a good one. I say that because from when our council supposedly adopted the 1976 act until about 12 years ago the hackney drivers here were told that in order to take a job on the phone, they needed an operators license............and the tvvats paid for them. =D> =D> =D> =D>


It was always a 50/50 thing - but the brentwood vs gladden judgement cleared it up.

If you read section 80 of the 76 act it defines what a operator is -

“operate” means in the course of business to make provision for the invitation or acceptance of bookings for a private hire vehicle;

“operator’s licence” means a licence under section 55 of this Act;

section 55 Licensing of operators of private hire vehicles.

(1) Subject to the provisions of this Part of this Act, a district council shall, on receipt of an application from any person for the grant to that person of a licence to operate private hire vehicles grant to that person an operator’s licence:

Provided that a district council shall not grant a licence unless they are satisfied that the applicant is a fit and proper person to hold an operator’s licence.

(2) Every licence granted under this section shall remain in force for such period, not being longer than five years, as a district council may specify in the licence.

(3) A district council may attach to the grant of a licence under this section such conditions as they may consider reasonably necessary.

(4) Any applicant aggrieved by the refusal of a district council to grant an operator’s licence under this section, or by any conditions attached to the grant of such a licence, may appeal to a magistrates’ court.



I did say "hackney only base"

Author:  captain cab [ Mon Jul 07, 2014 5:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Base...

wannabeeahack wrote:

I did say "hackney only base"


that's why I said no ffs

Author:  mancityfan [ Mon Jul 07, 2014 5:51 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Base...

Just to confuse you some more, the hack base could pass work on to a private hire vehicle from any where, so long as the private hire vehicle has his own ops licence, me thinks.

Author:  wannabeeahack [ Mon Jul 07, 2014 5:59 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Base...

but.....does a "base" need a hack plate of its own to pass work to a hack anywhere, it is just a phone number after all

Author:  mancityfan [ Mon Jul 07, 2014 8:51 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Base...

Some travel agents take taxi bookings ie airport runs then sub em to a p/hire company, do they need an ops licence? Virgin provide transport to the airport, I don't see there vehicles licensed,

Author:  grandad [ Mon Jul 07, 2014 9:52 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Base...

mancityfan wrote:
Some travel agents take taxi bookings ie airport runs then sub em to a p/hire company, do they need an ops licence? Virgin provide transport to the airport, I don't see there vehicles licensed,
The same with Emirates.

Author:  roythebus [ Tue Jul 08, 2014 7:55 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Base...

grandad wrote:
mancityfan wrote:
Some travel agents take taxi bookings ie airport runs then sub em to a p/hire company, do they need an ops licence? Virgin provide transport to the airport, I don't see there vehicles licensed,
The same with Emirates.
I'd say yes, they all come under the Rout-v-Swallow Hotel judgement. Providing transport for hire and reward, the H&R coming from part of the air fare or price of the holiday.

Author:  Sussex [ Tue Jul 08, 2014 4:49 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Base...

wannabeeahack wrote:
Does a hack only base need any licence from a LA and MUST it be inside any particular LA?

No.

Author:  Sussex [ Tue Jul 08, 2014 4:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Base...

mancityfan wrote:
Just to confuse you some more, the hack base could pass work on to a private hire vehicle from any where, so long as the private hire vehicle has his own ops licence, me thinks.

Yes.

Author:  Sussex [ Tue Jul 08, 2014 4:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Base...

grandad wrote:
mancityfan wrote:
Some travel agents take taxi bookings ie airport runs then sub em to a p/hire company, do they need an ops licence? Virgin provide transport to the airport, I don't see there vehicles licensed,
The same with Emirates.

I think the original phone taker does need a license now, but wont when the LC rules come in, if ever.

All the vehicles and drivers need a taxi or PH license. That wont change post LC.

Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/