| Taxi Driver Online http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/ |
|
| Base... http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=24680 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | wannabeeahack [ Mon Jul 07, 2014 11:43 am ] |
| Post subject: | Base... |
Does a hack only base need any licence from a LA and MUST it be inside any particular LA? |
|
| Author: | captain cab [ Mon Jul 07, 2014 12:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Base... |
wannabeeahack wrote: Does a hack only base need any licence from a LA No |
|
| Author: | grandad [ Mon Jul 07, 2014 1:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Base... |
captain cab wrote: wannabeeahack wrote: Does a hack only base need any licence from a LA No That is a good one. I say that because from when our council supposedly adopted the 1976 act until about 12 years ago the hackney drivers here were told that in order to take a job on the phone, they needed an operators license............and the tvvats paid for them.
|
|
| Author: | wannabeeahack [ Mon Jul 07, 2014 1:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Base... |
I live in a grey area close to my LA and another, a base here COOULD (in theory) do "double duty" to 2 areas legally i think, jus avoiding the use of any PH vehicles plated out of our LA |
|
| Author: | captain cab [ Mon Jul 07, 2014 2:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Base... |
grandad wrote: That is a good one. I say that because from when our council supposedly adopted the 1976 act until about 12 years ago the hackney drivers here were told that in order to take a job on the phone, they needed an operators license............and the tvvats paid for them. ![]() It was always a 50/50 thing - but the brentwood vs gladden judgement cleared it up. If you read section 80 of the 76 act it defines what a operator is - “operate” means in the course of business to make provision for the invitation or acceptance of bookings for a private hire vehicle; “operator’s licence” means a licence under section 55 of this Act; section 55 Licensing of operators of private hire vehicles. (1) Subject to the provisions of this Part of this Act, a district council shall, on receipt of an application from any person for the grant to that person of a licence to operate private hire vehicles grant to that person an operator’s licence: Provided that a district council shall not grant a licence unless they are satisfied that the applicant is a fit and proper person to hold an operator’s licence. (2) Every licence granted under this section shall remain in force for such period, not being longer than five years, as a district council may specify in the licence. (3) A district council may attach to the grant of a licence under this section such conditions as they may consider reasonably necessary. (4) Any applicant aggrieved by the refusal of a district council to grant an operator’s licence under this section, or by any conditions attached to the grant of such a licence, may appeal to a magistrates’ court. |
|
| Author: | wannabeeahack [ Mon Jul 07, 2014 4:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Base... |
captain cab wrote: grandad wrote: That is a good one. I say that because from when our council supposedly adopted the 1976 act until about 12 years ago the hackney drivers here were told that in order to take a job on the phone, they needed an operators license............and the tvvats paid for them. ![]() It was always a 50/50 thing - but the brentwood vs gladden judgement cleared it up. If you read section 80 of the 76 act it defines what a operator is - “operate” means in the course of business to make provision for the invitation or acceptance of bookings for a private hire vehicle; “operator’s licence” means a licence under section 55 of this Act; section 55 Licensing of operators of private hire vehicles. (1) Subject to the provisions of this Part of this Act, a district council shall, on receipt of an application from any person for the grant to that person of a licence to operate private hire vehicles grant to that person an operator’s licence: Provided that a district council shall not grant a licence unless they are satisfied that the applicant is a fit and proper person to hold an operator’s licence. (2) Every licence granted under this section shall remain in force for such period, not being longer than five years, as a district council may specify in the licence. (3) A district council may attach to the grant of a licence under this section such conditions as they may consider reasonably necessary. (4) Any applicant aggrieved by the refusal of a district council to grant an operator’s licence under this section, or by any conditions attached to the grant of such a licence, may appeal to a magistrates’ court. I did say "hackney only base" |
|
| Author: | captain cab [ Mon Jul 07, 2014 5:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Base... |
wannabeeahack wrote: I did say "hackney only base" that's why I said no ffs |
|
| Author: | mancityfan [ Mon Jul 07, 2014 5:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Base... |
Just to confuse you some more, the hack base could pass work on to a private hire vehicle from any where, so long as the private hire vehicle has his own ops licence, me thinks. |
|
| Author: | wannabeeahack [ Mon Jul 07, 2014 5:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Base... |
but.....does a "base" need a hack plate of its own to pass work to a hack anywhere, it is just a phone number after all |
|
| Author: | mancityfan [ Mon Jul 07, 2014 8:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Base... |
Some travel agents take taxi bookings ie airport runs then sub em to a p/hire company, do they need an ops licence? Virgin provide transport to the airport, I don't see there vehicles licensed, |
|
| Author: | grandad [ Mon Jul 07, 2014 9:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Base... |
mancityfan wrote: Some travel agents take taxi bookings ie airport runs then sub em to a p/hire company, do they need an ops licence? Virgin provide transport to the airport, I don't see there vehicles licensed, The same with Emirates.
|
|
| Author: | roythebus [ Tue Jul 08, 2014 7:55 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Base... |
grandad wrote: mancityfan wrote: Some travel agents take taxi bookings ie airport runs then sub em to a p/hire company, do they need an ops licence? Virgin provide transport to the airport, I don't see there vehicles licensed, The same with Emirates. |
|
| Author: | Sussex [ Tue Jul 08, 2014 4:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Base... |
wannabeeahack wrote: Does a hack only base need any licence from a LA and MUST it be inside any particular LA? No. |
|
| Author: | Sussex [ Tue Jul 08, 2014 4:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Base... |
mancityfan wrote: Just to confuse you some more, the hack base could pass work on to a private hire vehicle from any where, so long as the private hire vehicle has his own ops licence, me thinks. Yes. |
|
| Author: | Sussex [ Tue Jul 08, 2014 4:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Base... |
grandad wrote: mancityfan wrote: Some travel agents take taxi bookings ie airport runs then sub em to a p/hire company, do they need an ops licence? Virgin provide transport to the airport, I don't see there vehicles licensed, The same with Emirates.I think the original phone taker does need a license now, but wont when the LC rules come in, if ever. All the vehicles and drivers need a taxi or PH license. That wont change post LC. |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|