Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Thu Apr 30, 2026 5:53 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Sep 18, 2015 1:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 7:36 pm
Posts: 1477
I'm sure it's been discussed on here before, but does anyone have a definitive answer or does it depend on individual councils ?
We have a driver here that regularly carries his very young son ( 5 or 6 yrs ) in the front of his Hackney whilst working ( at least he uses a child seat though!) my question is, is he insured ? Also, he's licensed to carry 7 but can't because of his son in the front. I can't see this being legal.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 18, 2015 3:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Town Police Clauses Act 1847

59 Penalty for permitting persons to ride without consent of hirer.

Any proprietor or driver of any such hackney carriage which is hired who permits or suffers any person to be carried in or upon or about such hackney carriage during such hire, without the express consent of the person hiring the same, shall be liable to a penalty not exceeding [F44level 1 on the standard scale].

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 18, 2015 4:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24391
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
x-ray wrote:
I'm sure it's been discussed on here before, but does anyone have a definitive answer or does it depend on individual councils ?
We have a driver here that regularly carries his very young son ( 5 or 6 yrs ) in the front of his Hackney whilst working ( at least he uses a child seat though!) my question is, is he insured ? Also, he's licensed to carry 7 but can't because of his son in the front. I can't see this being legal.


How unprofessional, and why isnt the kid in school?

_________________
Of all the things ive lost, i miss my mind the most


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 18, 2015 10:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57349
Location: 1066 Country
x-ray wrote:
I'm sure it's been discussed on here before, but does anyone have a definitive answer or does it depend on individual councils ?
We have a driver here that regularly carries his very young son ( 5 or 6 yrs ) in the front of his Hackney whilst working ( at least he uses a child seat though!) my question is, is he insured ? Also, he's licensed to carry 7 but can't because of his son in the front. I can't see this being legal.

That's not right.

I understand the fella needs to earn, and the kid is safely strapped in, but working cabs are for punters, not child-minding.

I'm amazed no one has complained.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 19, 2015 3:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 7:24 pm
Posts: 6755
Sussex wrote:
x-ray wrote:
I'm sure it's been discussed on here before, but does anyone have a definitive answer or does it depend on individual councils ?
We have a driver here that regularly carries his very young son ( 5 or 6 yrs ) in the front of his Hackney whilst working ( at least he uses a child seat though!) my question is, is he insured ? Also, he's licensed to carry 7 but can't because of his son in the front. I can't see this being legal.

That's not right.

I understand the fella needs to earn, and the kid is safely strapped in, but working cabs are for punters, not child-minding.

I'm amazed no one has complained.


How desperate this guy must be having to resort to this to put some steam on the table all down to the fekking Tory Vermin :evil:

_________________
All posts by this contributor are made in a strictly personal capacity

I AM PROUD TO BE A CITIZEN NOBODY'S SUBJECT http://www.republic.org.u

F88K EM ALL WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND

BOOZE BOOZE BOOZE


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 19, 2015 5:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 8:23 pm
Posts: 5003
Location: Lincoln
trotskys twin wrote:
Sussex wrote:
x-ray wrote:
I'm sure it's been discussed on here before, but does anyone have a definitive answer or does it depend on individual councils ?
We have a driver here that regularly carries his very young son ( 5 or 6 yrs ) in the front of his Hackney whilst working ( at least he uses a child seat though!) my question is, is he insured ? Also, he's licensed to carry 7 but can't because of his son in the front. I can't see this being legal.

That's not right.

I understand the fella needs to earn, and the kid is safely strapped in, but working cabs are for punters, not child-minding.

I'm amazed no one has complained.


How desperate this guy must be having to resort to this to put some steam on the table all down to the fekking Tory Vermin :evil:


Was Arsenal losing 2-0 to Chelsea today down to the Fekking Tory Vermin too?

_________________
Former taxi driver


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 20, 2015 6:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
trotskys twin wrote:

NAH DOWN TO THEM THE ARSENAL; YESTERDAY BEING FEKKING USELESS #-o


the cheat Costa didn't help

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 20, 2015 6:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 7:24 pm
Posts: 6755
captain cab wrote:
trotskys twin wrote:

NAH DOWN TO THEM THE ARSENAL; YESTERDAY BEING FEKKING USELESS #-o


the cheat Costa didn't help


Excuses someone should have chinned the kkunt Keown or Adams would have done Ramsey the Welsh to$$er and Ozil the kraut burke didnt turn up Wenger is running out of time..............and as for Walcott ffs hes A COWARD THAT SAID CECH SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FIRST GOAL A RIGHT POXILE PERFORMANCE FROM THE CUP HOLDERS ](*,) :-"

_________________
All posts by this contributor are made in a strictly personal capacity

I AM PROUD TO BE A CITIZEN NOBODY'S SUBJECT http://www.republic.org.u

F88K EM ALL WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND

BOOZE BOOZE BOOZE


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 20, 2015 6:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 7:24 pm
Posts: 6755
trotskys twin wrote:
Sussex wrote:
x-ray wrote:
I'm sure it's been discussed on here before, but does anyone have a definitive answer or does it depend on individual councils ?
We have a driver here that regularly carries his very young son ( 5 or 6 yrs ) in the front of his Hackney whilst working ( at least he uses a child seat though!) my question is, is he insured ? Also, he's licensed to carry 7 but can't because of his son in the front. I can't see this being legal.

That's not right.

I understand the fella needs to earn, and the kid is safely strapped in, but working cabs are for punters, not child-minding.

I'm amazed no one has complained.


How desperate this guy must be having to resort to this to put some steam on the table all down to the fekking Tory Vermin :evil:

AND THIS OF COURSE THIS IS TRUE POOR FELLER WHAT A SITUATION TO BE IN MAKES ME BLOOD BOIL :twisted:

_________________
All posts by this contributor are made in a strictly personal capacity

I AM PROUD TO BE A CITIZEN NOBODY'S SUBJECT http://www.republic.org.u

F88K EM ALL WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND

BOOZE BOOZE BOOZE


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 191 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group