Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Thu Apr 30, 2026 4:13 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Nottingham case?
PostPosted: Fri Oct 09, 2015 10:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24391
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
Anyone hear of a Nottingham hack prosecuted for charging more than meter fare and having insurance invalidate due to breaking a byelaw?

is that likely?

_________________
Of all the things ive lost, i miss my mind the most


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nottingham case?
PostPosted: Fri Oct 09, 2015 10:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
wannabeeahack wrote:
Anyone hear of a Nottingham hack prosecuted for charging more than meter fare and having insurance invalidate due to breaking a byelaw?

is that likely?


Aint heard of that one tbh

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nottingham case?
PostPosted: Fri Oct 09, 2015 10:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24391
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
A taxi driver has been prosecuted after overcharging a customer.
Seydi Vakas Colak was ordered to pay £845 after being found guilty of not using the meter in his cab, resulting in his passenger being charged too much.
The action also invalidated his vehicle insurance.
Wellingborough Council’s licensing team received a complaint in October last year that Mr Colak, a licensed hackney carriage driver, had taken a passenger from the rank in Orient Way to an address in the town without turning on the meter in his cab.
At the end of the short journey, Mr Colak told his passenger the fare was £3.50.
As this was more than they usually paid, the passenger asked for a receipt and then contacted the council.
An investigation by licensing officers showed that because the meter wasn’t used, the fare charged was in excess of the maximum allowed under the set tariff prescribed by the council.
It was determined that not using the meter was contrary to the byelaws for hackney carriages and also meant the vehicle insurance was not valid.

http://www.national-taxi-association.co.uk/?p=9299

_________________
Of all the things ive lost, i miss my mind the most


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nottingham case?
PostPosted: Fri Oct 09, 2015 10:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 7:36 pm
Posts: 1477
wannabeeahack wrote:
Anyone hear of a Nottingham hack prosecuted for charging more than meter fare and having insurance invalidate due to breaking a byelaw?

is that likely?


Your not thinking of the case from Northamptonshire discussed on here a few weeks ago are you ? ( he didn't use his meter at all and was prosecuted for no insurance )


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nottingham case?
PostPosted: Fri Oct 09, 2015 10:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Oh This one from Northamptonshire not Nottingham? which was posted last month, you didn't comment on and we decided they were talking b*llocks on ? :wink:

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=27550&p=335223&hilit=Colak#p335223

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nottingham case?
PostPosted: Fri Oct 09, 2015 10:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
not too sure about the insurance angle myself - the driver can charge whatever he wants below the rate - interesting point though

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nottingham case?
PostPosted: Fri Oct 09, 2015 11:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
captain cab wrote:
Oh This one from Northamptonshire not Nottingham? which was posted last month, you didn't comment on and we decided they were talking b*llocks on ? :wink:

http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/vie ... ak#p335223

I think I did say...........The wording on the insurance is what makes the difference.....

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nottingham case?
PostPosted: Sat Oct 10, 2015 9:52 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24391
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
Only prosecute on the Insurance due to a BYE law, not a national law?

_________________
Of all the things ive lost, i miss my mind the most


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nottingham case?
PostPosted: Sat Oct 10, 2015 2:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
wannabeeahack wrote:
Only prosecute on the Insurance due to a BYE law, not a national law?

Some Insurance certificates state on them..that the insured is only insured as long as he complies with his licencing conditions..so a liverpool cab picking up in Sefton is uninsured....

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nottingham case?
PostPosted: Sat Oct 10, 2015 6:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24391
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
MR T wrote:
wannabeeahack wrote:
Only prosecute on the Insurance due to a BYE law, not a national law?

Some Insurance certificates state on them..that the insured is only insured as long as he complies with his licencing conditions..so a liverpool cab picking up in Sefton is uninsured....



unless its pre-booked

_________________
Of all the things ive lost, i miss my mind the most


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nottingham case?
PostPosted: Sat Oct 10, 2015 7:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
wannabeeahack wrote:
MR T wrote:
wannabeeahack wrote:
Only prosecute on the Insurance due to a BYE law, not a national law?

Some Insurance certificates state on them..that the insured is only insured as long as he complies with his licencing conditions..so a liverpool cab picking up in Sefton is uninsured....



unless its pre-booked
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: #-o #-o #-o #-o You are hard work... #-o #-o #-o

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nottingham case?
PostPosted: Sat Oct 10, 2015 9:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24391
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
YOU refer to Liverpool plate working full time in Sefton, but thats not what you said

_________________
Of all the things ive lost, i miss my mind the most


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nottingham case?
PostPosted: Sat Oct 10, 2015 11:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
wannabeeahack wrote:
YOU refer to Liverpool plate working full time in Sefton, but thats not what you said


When..

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nottingham case?
PostPosted: Sun Oct 11, 2015 7:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24391
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
MR T wrote:
wannabeeahack wrote:
YOU refer to Liverpool plate working full time in Sefton, but thats not what you said


When..




Are you losing it?

Quite obviously a Liverpool plate can pickup in Sefton....but not work there 51% of the time

MR T wrote:
wannabeeahack wrote:
Only prosecute on the Insurance due to a BYE law, not a national law?

Some Insurance certificates state on them..that the insured is only insured as long as he complies with his licencing conditions..so a liverpool cab picking up in Sefton is uninsured....

_________________
Of all the things ive lost, i miss my mind the most


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Nottingham case?
PostPosted: Sun Oct 11, 2015 10:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
Quote:
YOU refer to Liverpool plate working full time in Sefton, but thats not what you said


I never said full time....did I..

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 218 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group