Cgull wrote:
The council keeps tight control over the number of taxis operating in the city. Its system of managed growth allows licence numbers to increase by five a year.
In view of the councillor's positive spin on the spot checks, I had assumed that this was an attempt to link this matter with restricted numbers, but in fact the council's press release doesn't mention quotas and the above was presumably inserted by the Argus on its own volition.
But any allusion between this and restricted numbers is surely wrong, as I've argued frequently in the past. Is B&H's PH fleet worse than the HC motors, for example, and if not then surely the link is spurious? And if it is, then why not mention this in the article?
But the article doesn't differentiate HCs and PHs, so why raise the matter of taxi quotas?
Or am I in fact wrong and only taxis/HCs were stopped?
Argus article:
http://archive.theargus.co.uk/2006/4/14/209873.html
B&H Council press release:
http://www.brighton-hove.gov.uk/index.c ... t=c1155265