Sussex Man wrote:
I'm not sure if we are talking about a vehicle or driver licenses.
If it's a vehicle license, I suppose a council could say that you should be financially sound to keep it up to scratch. But then again, are councils fit and proper themselves to decide?
There is a slighlt difference in criteria for a proprietors licence than that of a drivers licence. In order to grant both licences a council may wish to satisfy itself that the person it is granting the licence to is fit and proper to carry out the duties expected of the licence holder in respect of the licence being granted.
In the case of a drivers licence a council may only need to satisfy itself that the person requesting the licence is not a danger to the public and that he can competently drive the vehicle he is being licenced for.
In order to gain a proprietors licence the applicant in some Authorities may not even need a driving licence. However, a licencing Authority may wish to satisfy itself when judging a person to be fit and proper that the applicant is financially solvent and they have no past history of financial impropriety. When granting such licences, a council has a duty to make sure the person it is granting the licence to "is a fit and proper person" and where a financial commitment is needed to service such a licence it is not unreasonable for a council to ask for evidence that the applicant is fit and proper under those circumstances.
If a person feels agrieved at not being granted a licence for whatever reason, he has the right to appeal to a court of law.
You will find case law on this and the learned Judges comments are very interesting.
One can't comment on the authority in question but I do find it odd that a drivers licence would be witheld because of arrears on council tax. If that is the case? I think a magistrates court would be very sympathetic should an applicant wish to appeal.
Best wishes
John Davies.