Doncha just love those articles on Taxi Point about stuff like the fine details of the seat belt rules, how much notes and change drivers should carry just in case someone's not paying by card, and how rank etiquette is so important etc. (OK, I'm probably making some of that stuff up
)Well no doubt there are some interesting nuggets of information and wisdom in most of them. But if you've been in the trade for a few years, a lot of it seems a tad stating-the-obvious in kind of, er, artificial language, and with a vaguely patronising tone. So I only tend to read the odd piece of the genre, or give them a quick skim.
But given my interesting in the basic terminology, when I saw the headline here I just HAD to read this. And, if you're a tired old cynic like me, it didn't disappoint
I mean, a lot of it is bang on and interesting. And particularly so to someone new to the trade, or to a member of the public. And even to someone who knows the basics, but not some of the details.
.
Problem is, though, there's something huge and spectacularly missing from this
And if you know the trade basics, then it shouldn't be difficult to spot.
Clue - it's quite a modern thing in the context of the article in the round
UNIQUE SELLING POINTS: Why the words taxi, hackney carriage, minicab and private hire matter more than ever before
https://www.taxi-point.co.uk/post/uniqu ... er-more-th
Few modern industries conduct daily business under terminology inherited from horse-drawn transport. Taxi licensing does exactly that. “Hackney carriage” survives in legislation, council policies and licence documents even though the working vehicle may be an electric car, purpose-built cab or wheelchair-accessible people carrier.
The Department for Transport says vehicles licensed under the Town Police Clauses Act 1847 or Metropolitan Public Carriage Act 1869 are described in those laws as hackney carriages. More recent legislation commonly uses the shorter word “taxi”.
The word predates the motor vehicle. London Museum explains that hackney coaches carried paying passengers in the capital during the 17th century and that “hackney” described a horse or carriage available for hire. Its exact linguistic origin remains debated.
The lighter cabriolet carriage later contributed the everyday word “cab”. The taximeter, which calculated the fare, helped produce “taxi”, a name that remained after engines replaced horses.
London’s first licensed petrol-powered taxi appeared in 1903. By then, motorcabs were competing with horse-drawn hansoms and four-wheeled vehicles.
The legal structure was already old. London hackney-carriage licensing dated from 1831, while the Town Police Clauses Act 1847 supplied the enduring framework used outside London.
The Metropolitan Public Carriage Act 1869 defined a hackney carriage by its availability to ply for hire within the metropolitan area, distinguishing it from a stage carriage in which passengers paid separate fares for their individual places.
That idea of immediate hiring remains the defining commercial privilege. A licensed taxi can wait at an authorised rank, be hailed in the street and also accept advance bookings.
A private hire vehicle occupies a different legal category. It must be booked through a licensed PHV operator and cannot lawfully ply for hire or use a taxi rank.
The modern PHV category emerged much later. Parliamentary evidence records that Plymouth legislated locally in 1975 and that Part II of the Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1976 then provided the principal framework for private hire licensing outside London.
London followed a separate path. Its private hire trade was brought into its current statutory framework through the Private Hire Vehicles (London) Act 1998, continuing the capital’s long history of separate taxi legislation.
“Minicab” is a familiar public description rather than the main statutory term. Government guidance uses “private hire vehicle” because that is the language of the relevant legislation.
The category is broader than the name suggests as PHVs include ordinary minicabs, app-dispatched cars, executive vehicles, chauffeur services, limousines and some school or day-centre transport.
That explains why appearance cannot reliably establish legal status. A luxury chauffeur car may be a PHV, while a conventional saloon could be licensed as a taxi by a council whose vehicle policy permits it.
Colour cannot decide the question either as not every taxi is black and not every black car is a taxi. Plates, identifiers, booking method and the issuing authority provide the more useful evidence.
There’s also clear licensing differences with taxis requiring vehicle and driver licences, while PHV operation uses a three-part system covering the driver, vehicle and booking operator. That also changes the passenger transaction. A person hailing a taxi deals directly with a service available for immediate hire. A PHV passenger makes a booking with the licensed operator, which then arranges the driver and vehicle.
Marketing language therefore matters more than ever before in advertising the unique selling points of each category. Using “taxi” loosely for every car carrying passengers may confuse customers about whether the vehicle can be hailed, where complaints should go and which fare rules apply.
The distinction does not mean taxis are old-fashioned and PHVs are modern. Both categories use sophisticated dispatch, card payment, telematics and zero-emission vehicles. Their difference lies in the legal route by which the passenger hires them.
The history also explains why reform is difficult as England and Wales retain statutes from different centuries, with separate systems in London and Plymouth and extensive local variation elsewhere.
“Taxi” is not a decorative word on a plate or a for hire light. It identifies a vehicle with immediate-hire rights and responsibilities that a minicab does not possess. That is unique and must remain a unique selling point for the industry.
)