Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Fri May 01, 2026 3:22 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Aug 03, 2008 12:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:17 am
Posts: 102
T4


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 03, 2008 2:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Posts: 8119
Location: A Villa in Aston NO MORE!
How absolutely crazy & irresponsible of these LAs to license a three door vehicle from the point of view of safety & comfort.

How many passengers are they licensed for?

But then again, didn't another LA (Cambridge perhaps???) license the two seater Smart car a year or two ago?

If I remember correctly their reasoning was that most taxi journeys are taken by single passengers.

The mind boggles!!!!

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 9:11 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 1:23 pm
Posts: 42
Location: Medway
Is this not a Fire Risk to the rear passenger?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:53 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24391
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
how many councils already plate MPV's where rear access is past/over another row, like sharans/galaxies, etc....

and those back seats are for the vertically challenged...

_________________
Of all the things ive lost, i miss my mind the most


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:57 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24391
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
medway wrote:
Is this not a Fire Risk to the rear passenger?


only if theres a fire

if there is a fire risk, how can the car be on the market, or indeed, any 2 door (3 with the rear)

_________________
Of all the things ive lost, i miss my mind the most


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 12:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 8:15 pm
Posts: 9170
wannabeeahack wrote:
medway wrote:
Is this not a Fire Risk to the rear passenger?


only if theres a fire

if there is a fire risk, how can the car be on the market, or indeed, any 2 door (3 with the rear)


Very true...A passengers still a Passenger whether he pays or not...safety is just not the Domain of the fare Paying punters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 6:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
medway wrote:
Is this not a Fire Risk to the rear passenger?

I understand, and agree with, your point, but if it was a fire risk for punters then surely it would also be a fire risk for passengers if the vehicle was unlicensed.

Putting a plate on the back really shouldn't effect fire risk. Therefore if VOSA and the crash test folks have deemed it safe, how can anyone conclude otherwise? :?

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
Sussex...a council has a duty of care.... if it fails in that duty it can be sued....
now a two-door vehicle might be perfectly all right for the everyday person after all he can't sue himself can he.....

Any council that Licence a two-door saloon vehicle is well leaving themselves open.
if that vehicle is involved in an accident and the front passengers are trapped how do the rear passengers get out..... and in the case of a death..... that council might well have some serious questions to answer about its duty of care.... licensing officers need retraining..... 8)

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
Are licensing officers better placed to decide on a vehicles safety than VOSA and the crash test dummy folks? I say NO. :shock:

Are they better place to decide on suitability for the job of taxi/PH? I say maybe.

So they should use that reasoning rather that the safety scare tactics. :wink:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
You really don't understand councils do you ... pavements are their responsibility and they have to fend off millions of pounds each year in claims.
councils have a responsibility for the safety of the public..... if not... why do you argue that the tut-tuts are unsafe ...... you can't have your cake and eat it..... even though you want to .

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24391
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
I can see one big advantge


im suprised you old dogs havent....





























the feckers in the back cant run off without paying....

_________________
Of all the things ive lost, i miss my mind the most


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24391
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
fairwaydriver wrote:

I managed to get a quick photo on Wednesday of the first Micra on Wirral.


Image



well, has he still got his wheel trims?

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
Of all the things ive lost, i miss my mind the most


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 5:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 12:03 am
Posts: 486
Location: dundee land of many plates
i have no safety issues with this vehicle,the way i see it in the event of a fire i could easily open my door run and hide behind a wall untill the vehicle explodes,other issues do concern me,what about the large drunk who cant stand,its hard enough getting him out a four door imagine getting him out a two door,then there is the pensioners, ill bet they love manouvering into and out of this cars back seats


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 7:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
MR T wrote:
why do you argue that the tut-tuts are unsafe ......

Because they are and were.

Once Type Approval comes in for buses/taxis/PH, Tuk Tuks will be a thing of the past. \:D/ \:D/

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 12:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24391
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
Sussex wrote:
MR T wrote:
why do you argue that the tut-tuts are unsafe ......

Because they are and were.

Once Type Approval comes in for buses/taxis/PH, Tuk Tuks will be a thing of the past. \:D/ \:D/


TILL THEN YOU CAN ONLY TUT TUT...... 8) 8) 8) 8)

_________________
Of all the things ive lost, i miss my mind the most


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 219 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group