captain cab wrote:
IMO councils shouldn't regulate any CCTV system its not their job, its the ICO's.
Have you lobbied your MP on this? It could be good practice for the lobbying that is coming.
I would like the Council, Information Commissioners Office and the Police to have access, with a compulsion on any and all of them to provide us with the evidence that we may need.
For myself I think I am reasonably happy with the first reading, but I would like it clarified a bit on access to the Driver to use in the limited circumstances where it is actually a "Civil Matter" and not Criminal. As stated, the Cameras see "Outside" as well and this may be needed by us and the insurance companies. If the pictures get overwritten someone had better be available to download them before they are gone forever!
Even post criminal proceedings, a difference between the amount ordered by the Criminal Court and the total losses borne by the Driver/Proprietor may be a "Civil Matter".
If we have to have Cameras, access to the film we need must be made.
I am delighted that the Councils and not us pay for the equipment and I think it reasonable that we pay for fitting and maintenance. I presume that on selling the vehicle we also have to get it out, but it does not, so far, say that.