sasha wrote:
With the way things are potentially heading, in regards to the uber case, it's something that could affect all drivers on a company.
However it looks like each case would be judged individually, meaning each driver would have to raise a case with a tribunal. The more drivers there are in a union there is the possibility that rather than being heard as seperate cases groups of drivers within one company could be heard as one case.
Each case costs £1,200 to take to tribunal, on top of any legal fees. A union won't back anyone who's not a member and would be less likely to back individuals - but a group of 10-20 drivers ?
Yes there's the financial cost, but it's more about having the expertise and advice, and a higher chance of success and backing for a group of drivers than an individual. Once a case is heard and a judgement made it then sets a precedent that others can follow. Someone has to take the first step though.
I paid into Unison for 20 years and never needed them, but this is about drivers all over the country and what their rights and entitlements are(if any). Even if just to clarify what control companies have over drivers.
Why did you stop paying to Unison? Again it raises its head " I have a problem,better join some organisation to solve it"
Cannot understand why everyone is not in one of the trade organisations,it only costs a few quid a year to be a member and accrue a fighting fund from day one,Uber is not the only problem,every private hire operator will do their utmost to not pay holiday or sick pay or have a pension scheme for all employees to participate in.