Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Fri Oct 17, 2025 4:38 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 35 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2005 10:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 8:23 pm
Posts: 4983
Location: Lincoln
TDO wrote:
jimbo wrote:
Sussex wrote:
jimbo wrote:
Gosh, is there any worse creature on God's Earth than a know all PH driver? :x

Yes, some mush who loves Metrocabs. :shock:


But aren't you gagging to join our ranks? Do I "love" my Metrocab? More than I love the wife, but I loved my old metro more than that! I'd rather be a mush in a metro than a magpie in a montego, so thanks for the complement.


So how many hackney drivers would rather drive a Metro (or a TX, come to that) given the choice?

The evidence from around the country suggests that it's a lot less than 1%, so your preference makes you a bit of a maverick Jimbo.

For ten years we haven't had a "choice" in our fair City. in 1994 WAV for all, or go PH. And there was not the "OPTION" of a bread van in those days, it was LTI or METRO. (Although some geezer in 1992 tried a converted Transit that looked lika a cut and shut with two front ends. Launched in Preston, it looked bloody awful... what ever became of em?

But I suspect you're being disingenuous, a bit like people who criticise the lack of posters on here, but when challenged about the moribund nature of their own forums, say that they didn't want people to post much anyway :lol:


And i am as disingenuous as Tony Blair.....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 04, 2005 10:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 1:27 pm
Posts: 305
Location: London LPH
I can't believe that anyone in their right minds could think that a Metrocab is value for money. [-(

It's a pile of s***. :shock:

_________________
Happy to be legit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 08, 2005 4:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 8:23 pm
Posts: 4983
Location: Lincoln
Ollie wrote:
I can't believe that anyone in their right minds could think that a Metrocab is value for money. [-(

It's a pile of s***. :shock:


Could you point out where I have said that a Metrocab is "value for money?"

And also tell me how you know "It's a pile of s***.?" Mr LPH, ever owned one? Thought not.

I got into a PH in London, but as the driver did not know the way to Marble Arch from Tottenham Court Road, I decided to use the tube.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 08, 2005 6:04 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 56521
Location: 1066 Country
jimbo wrote:
I got into a PH in London, but as the driver did not know the way to Marble Arch from Tottenham Court Road, I decided to use the tube.

You remind me of the mush who got a ticket for being parked on a rank, whilst he was taking this old dear somewhere. :^o :^o

But at least you preferred the tube to a black cab. :lol:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 09, 2005 1:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
jimbo wrote:
Could you point out where I have said that a Metrocab is "value for money?"

And also tell me how you know "It's a pile of s***.?" Mr LPH, ever owned one? Thought not.

I got into a PH in London, but as the driver did not know the way to Marble Arch from Tottenham Court Road, I decided to use the tube.


So what bearing does that have on whether a Metrocab represents value for money? #-o

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 09, 2005 6:29 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 56521
Location: 1066 Country
TDO wrote:
jimbo wrote:
I got into a PH in London, but as the driver did not know the way to Marble Arch from Tottenham Court Road, I decided to use the tube.


So what bearing does that have on whether a Metrocab represents value for money? #-o

Nothing at all.

But I suspect he was desperate to share his fable with us all. :?

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 09, 2005 7:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 8998
Location: London
Ollie wrote:
I can't believe that anyone in their right minds could think that a Metrocab is value for money. [-(

It's a pile of s***. :shock:


Yes your wright there Ollie, it must have been hell driving your Metrocab around the streets of London for all those years . . . . .Oh hang about, I nearly forgot, your a Minicab driver, ha, silly me I thought just for a fleeting moment you were a Taxi driver . . . .

So tell us all Ollie, in your experience as a Metrocab expert why you regard them as s***, or are you just talking s***?

Ohhh I want to be in your gang . . . :doubt:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 09, 2005 7:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 8998
Location: London
TDO wrote:
So how many hackney drivers would rather drive a Metro (or a TX, come to that) given the choice?

The evidence from around the country suggests that it's a lot less than 1%, so your preference makes you a bit of a maverick Jimbo.


Well, I don't know on that little question you ask.

I have yet to meet a TTT owner who has not sung praises about the Toyota engined version (Euro 3 compliant) with very little mechanical problems to speak of.

Now the Mk 2 and 3's are not popular in London, given that you can pick up a P reg with about 130,000 on the clock for about £3-4K, wheras the fairways still go for the £7k mark.

So given the choice (if they ever do come back in any numbers) a purring Toyota engine, or a rattling ford, many may opt for the Metro. ?

Plus, they retail for less than LTI.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 10, 2005 6:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
Yes, I won't quibble with you with regard to the purpose builts. #-o

But my point was in response to Jimbo's original claim that seemed to be that he would rather drive a purpose built than a saloon.

My response was that where drivers can choose between PBs and saloons, then the overwhelming majority choose saloons, and thus Jimbo was just trying to make it look as if he prefers a PB to a saloon, whereas in reality he'd much prefer to be driving a nice Skoda Superb or suchlike :D

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 13, 2005 8:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 8:23 pm
Posts: 4983
Location: Lincoln
TDO wrote:
Yes, I won't quibble with you with regard to the purpose builts. #-o

But my point was in response to Jimbo's original claim that seemed to be that he would rather drive a purpose built than a saloon.

My response was that where drivers can choose between PBs and saloons, then the overwhelming majority choose saloons, and thus Jimbo was just trying to make it look as if he prefers a PB to a saloon, whereas in reality he'd much prefer to be driving a nice Skoda Superb or suchlike :D

I work in Lincoln as a Hackney Carriage owner/driver. since 1994 I have had a choice of Metrocab or LTI. (or now also a converted van) I cannot license a saloon. I have never said whether I would put on a saloon in preference to a purpose built, because I do not have that option and there is no point in speculating on what I would drive if I could choose.
If I could though, would I put on a £15,000 new saloon, or a £30,000 purpose built? well, let me think about that for a moment... But tonight when some smug saloon driver gets four burly guys climbing into his car, is he going to be wishing he had a nice partition between them and him?
When they spill chilli sauce all over his nice carpet, from the kebabs they smuggled in under their jumpers, is he going to wonder how long it will take to get rid of the stink?

So, to work in Lincoln for the last eleven years, I had four choices: Get a Metro, get a TX, get a breadvan(no thanks, the punters hate them,) or go Private Hire. I chose the lesser of four evils. The Skoda may be lovely, I don't know, because I have never driven one, so therefore I will not pass judgement on them. They built crap cars in the past, most owners say they are wonderful now. The same could be said about Metrocabs, By people who own one. Give peace a chance, Love and respect, Jimbo.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 14, 2005 8:39 pm 
we have lads that got there plates for nothing and still but secondhand skodas.
yet we also have lads that buy brand new wavs having just bought a £45,000 plate.
so one pays £6,000 to work. the other £75,000 but both charge the same.
how much sense does that make? :shock:


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 16, 2005 3:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
jimbo wrote:
TDO wrote:
But my point was in response to Jimbo's original claim that seemed to be that he would rather drive a purpose built than a saloon.

My response was that where drivers can choose between PBs and saloons, then the overwhelming majority choose saloons, and thus Jimbo was just trying to make it look as if he prefers a PB to a saloon, whereas in reality he'd much prefer to be driving a nice Skoda Superb or suchlike :D

I work in Lincoln as a Hackney Carriage owner/driver. since 1994 I have had a choice of Metrocab or LTI. (or now also a converted van) I cannot license a saloon. I have never said whether I would put on a saloon in preference to a purpose built, because I do not have that option and there is no point in speculating on what I would drive if I could choose.


Yes, I did assume that you didn't have the choice to run a saloon, because the essence of my point was that because you don't run a saloon then you obviously couldn't choose to. :wink:

But my point was in response to when you said further up the thread:

I'd rather be a mush in a metro than a magpie in a montego

Perhaps I misconstrued what you meant?

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 16, 2005 3:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
jimbo wrote:
[
If I could though, would I put on a £15,000 new saloon, or a £30,000 purpose built? well, let me think about that for a moment... But tonight when some smug saloon driver gets four burly guys climbing into his car, is he going to be wishing he had a nice partition between them and him?
When they spill chilli sauce all over his nice carpet, from the kebabs they smuggled in under their jumpers, is he going to wonder how long it will take to get rid of the stink?



Perhaps, but as I said originally, the proof of the pudding is in the eating......even in big cities like Brighton, I don't think there are many Metros or even TXs, particularly when, as in the case of the vast majority of plates, the ownere can choose a saloon.

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 16, 2005 9:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 8:23 pm
Posts: 4983
Location: Lincoln
TDO wrote:
jimbo wrote:
TDO wrote:
But my point was in response to Jimbo's original claim that seemed to be that he would rather drive a purpose built than a saloon.

My response was that where drivers can choose between PBs and saloons, then the overwhelming majority choose saloons, and thus Jimbo was just trying to make it look as if he prefers a PB to a saloon, whereas in reality he'd much prefer to be driving a nice Skoda Superb or suchlike :D

I work in Lincoln as a Hackney Carriage owner/driver. since 1994 I have had a choice of Metrocab or LTI. (or now also a converted van) I cannot license a saloon. I have never said whether I would put on a saloon in preference to a purpose built, because I do not have that option and there is no point in speculating on what I would drive if I could choose.


Yes, I did assume that you didn't have the choice to run a saloon, because the essence of my point was that because you don't run a saloon then you obviously couldn't choose to. :wink:

But my point was in response to when you said further up the thread:

I'd rather be a mush in a metro than a magpie in a montego

Perhaps I misconstrued what you meant?


What I meant when I said i'd rather be a mush in a metro... was, simply put, I'd rather be my own boss in a hack, than a PH owner/driver working from an office, paying a ton a week for my jobs, being told when to start, when to finish, when to take a break, or a day off, or a week off, and not daring to say no to the boss for fear of being laid off for an hour or more as punishment for refusing a job, in short, I would rather work as a freeman than as a serf to someone earning vast sums off my sweat.
Under these circumstances, owning a Metrocab is a small price to pay.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2005 1:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
Yes, I get the point Jimbo - you mean you'd rather by a taxi than a PH driver - when you compared the Metro with the Montego I thought you perhaps meant that you'd rather drive a PB rather than a saloon even if you had the choice :)

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 35 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 97 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group