Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Thu Apr 30, 2026 10:19 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 74 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 12:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Posts: 8119
Location: A Villa in Aston NO MORE!
B I R M I N G H A M;

Hackney & Private Hire Cull Proposals & More



The Licensing Committee Agenda has now been finalised for the first round of a raft of proposals that will have far-reaching consequences for both the Hackney Carriage and Private Hire trades in Birmingham.

There are no less than seven agenda items at this next licensing committee meeting that will be relevant to the Birmingham ‘trade’. The fun begins!

The links is;



Online Main Agenda Page


Referring to the Agenda PDF on this Online Main Agenda Page, the relevant agenda items in order of importance are;

Item 5
Item 7
Item 6
Item 9
Items 3, 4 & 8

Happy reading & may I please request lots of views, posts & debate on this one.

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 12:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Posts: 8119
Location: A Villa in Aston NO MORE!
The link is broken; repairs in progress.

Sorry, back soon.


ADDENDUM


This link seems to be erratic, for some unknown reason.

If you do not get the Online Main Agenda Page, which is titled Regulatory Meetings – Licensing Committee, & you get the Meeting Search Page instead, proceed as follows;

On the first drop down-menu choose ‘Regulatory’

On the second drop-down menu choose ‘Licensing Committee’ (do not choose A to E)

In the ‘From’ box type in 01/09/2008

In the ‘To’ box type in 30/09/2008

Click on ‘Go’

Click on Licensing Committee dated 17/09/2008.

Sorry about the link, there is no reason that I can find that it erratically chooses either one of these two pages at random.

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 1:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
And last time the OFT were about , they were claiming the Taxi Service in Birmingham was perfect..... I seem to get the impression that the flavour of the report is that derestriction is a failure.... nothing new there than.

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 2:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Posts: 8119
Location: A Villa in Aston NO MORE!
MR T wrote:
And last time the OFT were about , they were claiming the Taxi Service in Birmingham was perfect..... I seem to get the impression that the flavour of the report is that derestriction is a failure.... nothing new there than.


There may have been then, but I can assure you there is gubber all perfect about the taxi service in Birmingham now!!!

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 2:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
MR T wrote:
And last time the OFT were about , they were claiming the Taxi Service in Birmingham was perfect..... I seem to get the impression that the flavour of the report is that derestriction is a failure.... nothing new there than.


You cynic!

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 3:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
Tried to read this but it's having none of it. I get to the report but can't click on the relevant sections, so like all good taxi drivers I's gived up :roll:

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 4:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 12045
Location: Aberdeen
MR T wrote:
I seem to get the impression that the flavour of the report is that derestriction is a failure....


Seems to me more of an admission that it was done badly.........

_________________
Image
http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 5:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
MR T wrote:
And last time the OFT were about , they were claiming the Taxi Service in Birmingham was perfect..... I seem to get the impression that the flavour of the report is that derestriction is a failure.... nothing new there than.

Isn't the recommendation for quality controls not quantity controls? :?

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 5:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
I'm confused as to why PH age limits are lower than HC age limits? :?

I see the council is being asked to stop transfers of HC licenses. Clearly the survey folks don't take much notice of the law. :?

And £50 for CCTV must be right? Eh? :?

And I love the 'controlled deregulation' theory. Isn't that just 'managed growth'? :?

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 6:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
Look I hate benefit fraud as much as every other tax paying mug on here, but I don't believe the council has the right to suspend drivers for benefit fraud. [-X

They are either 'fit and proper' to have a license, or not. If they are not then they have their license revoked.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 6:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
And is there a good reason why the council feels the need to carry forward a £250,000 surplus?

That money is money taken from the trade yet not spent. So give it back. :sad:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Posts: 8119
Location: A Villa in Aston NO MORE!
toots wrote:
Tried to read this but it's having none of it. I get to the report but can't click on the relevant sections, so like all good taxi drivers I's gived up :roll:


You click on the Adobe PDF logo & not the narrative.

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Posts: 8119
Location: A Villa in Aston NO MORE!
gusmac wrote:
MR T wrote:
I seem to get the impression that the flavour of the report is that derestriction is a failure....

Seems to me more of an admission that it was done badly.........


Both really; it was done piecemeal over many of years by different LOs, & there was no thought or co-ordination with all the different constituents of the Hackney & Private Hire trades.

It was kind of, 'Oh lets do this', & a few years later, 'And now lets try that'.

This seems better at the moment, but this is just the first step, with on-going dialogue.

I'm not happy about some of the proposals, but on the whole it's a step in the right direction.

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Posts: 8119
Location: A Villa in Aston NO MORE!
Sussex wrote:
I'm confused as to why PH age limits are lower than HC age limits? :? :?


Saloon vehicles versus purpose built commercial vehicles. A lot of councils go down that route.

Sussex wrote:
I see the council is being asked to stop transfers of HC licenses. Clearly the survey folks don't take much notice of the law. :? :?


I don't know where that one is in the report, but I think I know the gist of this.

One of our long standing representatives argued for years that you could transfer a Hackney plate, without a vehicle attached to it. As it happens he was wrong for all those years, because you actually transfer the Hackney Carriage with the plate attached to it. There was a case in Brum in the last few years where a multi-multi-owner had bought in Hackneys with plates, scraped the vehicles & kept the plates in a drawer, ready to put vehicles onto these plates, when he saw fit to do so, before the plate expired, & then had the plate transferred into his name

I think it is that practice the report is referring to.

Sussex wrote:
And £50 for CCTV must be right? Eh? :? :?


The £50 CCTV systems used to be in a Corn Flakes packet, but are now in the Weetabix box. Stupid survey company!

Sussex wrote:
And I love the 'controlled deregulation' theory. Isn't that just 'managed growth'? :?


Is called 'Managed Growth' in Manchester, but in Birmingham we have a posher name for it, hence 'Controlled De-regulation'.

The Hackney trade has realised that plates should be issued if there is a significant unmet demand for the services of Hackney Carriages, but at the moment there is a quite massive oversupply. I particularly like the annual survey idea.

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Posts: 8119
Location: A Villa in Aston NO MORE!
Sussex wrote:
And is there a good reason why the council feels the need to carry forward a £250,000 surplus?

That money is money taken from the trade yet not spent. So give it back. :sad:


No way Jose.

Keep it there as a buffer.

If they've got the money, they can't argue that they are short of funds for a survey, enforcement, more staff etc.

It is when councils run on a shoestring in the licensing department that you get problems about trying to get things done & the answer comes back, 'We haven't got the money,' or worse still, 'We're in deficit'.

No sir, leave it as it is for me.

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 74 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cerberus and 340 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group