charles007 wrote:
Chilon of Sparta wrote:
So....that'll be eight letters in Charles' association name now then. One more and he'll have what would be the worst selection ever, were it to come up on TV's "Countdown" prog, which strangely enough, I gather he's applied to enter, when the next series starts.
But cant spell, are can i. but thank you very much for your post.
Fair play to you Charles, you take a bit of stick, but you're like the bloody Terminator, you keep getting up and giving it back. I wish you well with your endeavours.
On that topic, how did you get on with the FOS? You suggested in your post of 23rd May that you may possibly have an answer on your "Preston problems" within 20 days (see below and forgive my copy/pasting it).
I'm sure you'll keep us informed, when you are legally able to do so of course. To us mere observers, it seems that both sides in this somewhat strange battle within the trade were rather confident about winning, so someone could end up rather embarrassed!
Posted: Sat May 23, 2009 8:32 pm Post subject: PHCA
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
charles007 wrote
1) Was Mr T there at the preston meeting No
2) was Mr Casey there at the meeting No
3) Was Selly there No
4) where Members of the PHAC yes and committe members yes
5) were is your proff i am wrong
6) so the PHCA members are also not right as well.
7) so the committee how signed the papers are wrong
The meeting on the 10th Janury 2008 was set up by our soliciors the meeting was overseen by our soliciors, the minutes were drawn up by the solicitors.
so an officer of the court as made it all this up have they. told lies put it in black and white, am i making the point yet.
and who was at the meeting the NTA Region 5 DIRECTOR. THank you and sat on the top table
Who was not there yes selly that right you whould think he would have been.
Who says its wrong
1) casey but he was not there
2) Mr T but he was not there
3) selly was not there
4) The good people on there but you were not there.
Well there you have it i was wrong all the time.
ALL THEY HAD TO DO WAS TO GIVE HALF THE FUNDS TO PHCA NOT ME PHCA, we cant stop them calling themselfs what have called themselfs, but siad no. so as said if the FOS, SAYS IS BEST DEALT WITH BY THE COURTS THAT WERE IT WILL GO. AND FOR THE FULL AMOUNT.
Every chance as been given to them, i will know the ruleing of the fos with now 20 days. i will act on the ruleing._________________
C. Oakes
www.bbbbpha.co.uk
Login
Register
FAQ
