captain cab wrote:
Brummie Cabbie wrote:
skippy41 wrote:
Nimrod wrote:
LIVERPOOL CITY COUNCIL HAVE DEFERED A DECISON ON LICENCING THE E7 AFTER RECIEVING A OBJECTION FROM LTI SOLICITORS
How can they defer a high court ruling LTI solicitors had there chance in court and lost
Because this is
LIVERPOOL!!!Not quite right......people should really read what the Judge said
CC
The judge quashed the committee's decision & asked them to re-consider the matter afresh.
Are you saying that the committee can again refuse to license the E7, albeit giving different grounds for refusal?
46. Since this error was critical to its decision in respect of its DDA duties, the balance of competing considerations if EC law was engaged and generally, it must be quashed and the matter remitted for reconsideration unless Ms Patterson could satisfy me that it could make no difference to the outcome. I conclude that she cannot so satisfy me.
52. On reconsideration of this matter, all this material will be available along with the material originally supplied. I therefore propose to quash the decision and remit it for reconsideration. What then follows in this judgment are my conclusions on the disputed legal issues that should inform that reconsideration.
Conclusions
82. Beyond these considerations it is of course for the defendant itself to re-determine this application on the merits in accordance with the law set out in the judgment. I conclude that no other claim for relief is made out, save for quashing with a view to reconsideration. For the reasons I have given, this application for judicial review succeeds.