Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Thu Apr 23, 2026 10:51 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Feb 12, 2010 2:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Taxi driver cleared of sex attack on passenger


A taxi driver has been cleared of sexually assaulting a passenger.

Nadeem Khan, 40, wept in the dock as a jury at Hove Crown Court unanimously found him not guilty yesterday.

Mr Khan, a father-of-four, had picked a 22-year-old woman and her friends up from outside Occasions nightclub in Worthing on May 17 last year.

He drove them back to Burgess Hill but two got out in Hove after a row in the taxi.

Mr Khan, of Brittany Road, Worthing, said the woman, who cannot be named, was the last to be dropped off at her mother's home near the train station.

He said she went into the house to get the rest of the money for the £65 taxi fare because she did not have enough on her.

The jury was told that she told Mr Khan she would not have enough to buy things for her baby nephew the next day if she gave him the cash.

The woman said he then kissed and groped her despite her telling him to stop.

Mr Khan insisted she had hugged him and kissed him on the cheek after he agreed to let her pay the money the next day.

He told the jury: “I am a taxi driver, I would not do anything like that.

“If I had intended to do that I would not have done it outside her house.

“Her father, boyfriend or brother could have been there and come out.”

Raymond Terry, a taxi operator for Arrow Private Hire in Worthing, said he received two calls from Mr Khan about the incident just before 3am.

Mr Terry said: “In the second call he said she has got no money boss and is trying to hug me.

“He said to her to get off him.”

Mr Khan, who supports 14 Kashmiri orphans and helps to pay for their schooling, has no previous convictions or police cautions.

Judge David Rennie told Mr Khan after the verdict: “You are returned to your family and your job with your good name intact.”

source: http://www.theargus.co.uk/news/

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 12, 2010 6:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57329
Location: 1066 Country
captain cab wrote:
Judge David Rennie told Mr Khan after the verdict: “You are returned to your family and your job with your good name intact.”

If it's good enough for Judge Rennie, then it's good enough for me.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 12, 2010 7:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Sussex wrote:
captain cab wrote:
Judge David Rennie told Mr Khan after the verdict: “You are returned to your family and your job with your good name intact.”

If it's good enough for Judge Rennie, then it's good enough for me.


Maybe so.......I really feel for this guy, he must have been through hell thinking about the consequences.......she should be named and put on trial herself.

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 12, 2010 8:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57329
Location: 1066 Country
captain cab wrote:
Maybe so.......I really feel for this guy, he must have been through hell thinking about the consequences.......she should be named and put on trial herself.

There is a good argument for doing so.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 12, 2010 8:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2008 10:56 pm
Posts: 201
captain cab wrote:
Sussex wrote:
captain cab wrote:
Judge David Rennie told Mr Khan after the verdict: “You are returned to your family and your job with your good name intact.”

If it's good enough for Judge Rennie, then it's good enough for me.


Maybe so.......I really feel for this guy, he must have been through hell thinking about the consequences.......she should be named and put on trial herself.

CC


Absolutely right CC. There are far too many assault/rape accusers who turn out to be lying, vindictive b*****ds, once the evidence is presented. Such scum should be pursued with the full force of the law, if there is enough evidence to do so...but there may lie the problem. The CPS seem to then apply different criteria as to what may be sufficient evidence as to proceed with a prosecution.

There would also be those speaking out about real victims not daring to report incidents if they felt they could end up being prosecuted. To them, I say b*****ks! Prosecutions would only take place where there was clear evidence of lying.

In the meantime, a very simple change in the law should take place. The person accused of the offence should be given the same anonymity as the victim, until/unless they are proved to be guilty, in which case, then they can be thrown to the wolves.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 12, 2010 8:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
Quote:
There are far too many assault/rape accusers who turn out to be lying


I think that implies there are lots of these accusations going to court, thankfully this is not the case, having said that I think just one case is one too many as this is a dreadful crime to be accused of.

Quote:
There would also be those speaking out about real victims not daring to report incidents if they felt they could end up being prosecuted. To them, I say b*****ks! Prosecutions would only take place where there was clear evidence of lying.


Bearing in mind the amount of prosecutions that fail due to lack of evidence and those that don't even get as far as the court this is a real concern for genuine victims.

Quote:
In the meantime, a very simple change in the law should take place. The person accused of the offence should be given the same anonymity as the victim, until/unless they are proved to be guilty, in which case, then they can be thrown to the wolves.


This I believe is a very fair way of dealing with things, but, you will still have the gossips who can't keep their mouths shut and the newspaper reporters who believe they have the right to report on anything and anybody regardless of the consequences. People are being named and shamed before there is any proof of wrong doing. Papers should be held responsible for some of the 'facts' they report.

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 353 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group