TDO wrote:
Gateshead Angel wrote:
If Mr T can get a free plate, why can't the drivers whom you claim he will make a profit from, you claim they are excluded, how then isn't Mr T ?
Can GA or anyone else please explain this?
No problem.
TDO wrote:
You get a free plate from the council, then run bleating to the courts when the LA decides to treat everyone similarly, and you suddenly reailse that you can't make a big fat profit off excluded drivers.
Are you suggesting that we ignore the premium paid by Mr T because it wasn't paid to the council.
Or are you suggesting something quite different.
You also don't point out, nor are you willing to recognise that plate premiums exist in derestricted as well as restricted areas.
You also don't point out that these plates are for sale, and can be purchased by people wishing to enter the trade for less than they will pay a PH operator in fees over a 5 year period, if a loan is required to fund the purchase.
It makes me laugh when people come on here and state they didn't want to pay someone £25k for the right to work in the HC trade, yet they are willing (and see nothing wrong) to pay someone to provide them with work, in many cases over a period exceeding 10 years. I would say to them
how much have you paid in operator fees since you started and then
how much more will you be paying them until you retire or leave the trade.
In the specific case of Sussex, all I can say is that a bloke with his head screwed on like he has could have invested in a HC when he first started, paid less for it than he has already paid in fees, and now have is own regular clients and his own school run backing up what he makes off the ranks.
The fact is that he knows this, he knows now that he made the wrong decision those years ago, and he just can't forgive himself, so he blames everyone else to deflect from his own shortcomings, while critisising those of us who made the decision he wishes he did.
Happy New Year.
B. Lucky
