Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Thu May 07, 2026 4:47 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 48 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 11:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 10460
A really big man would put his hands up, and say, yes I have made a complete tit of myself, and the Skull got me big time.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Are you that big man Trevor?
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 12:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
I guess I would get a solicitor and answer the allegations and ask them to provide the evidence they have for the charge. What I wouldn't do is keep silent, they're dreadful charges. Also I believe because this relates to kiddie porn (ffs) it would most definately be a criminal matter and not something dealt with by the council. I hate playing 'what if' :roll: I'm seriously concerned about what goes through your head at times. Of all the allegations that could have been made you choose 'kiddie porn'

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 12:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 10460
toots wrote:
I guess I would get a solicitor and answer the allegations and ask them to provide the evidence they have for the charge. What I wouldn't do is keep silent, they're dreadful charges. Also I believe because this relates to kiddie porn (ffs) it would most definately be a criminal matter and not something dealt with by the council. I hate playing 'what if' :roll: I'm seriously concerned about what goes through your head at times. Of all the allegations that could have been made you choose 'kiddie porn'


Non attendance at the council hearing proves that you are guilty for looking at kiddie porn. What more is there to add?

This is your world and not mine, why should I care? The burden of proof is upon you to prove your innocence. If you don't attend what do you expect?

You and Mr. T should be jumping up and down. This is the way you want it, is it not? :shock: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 12:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
Skull wrote:
toots wrote:
I guess I would get a solicitor and answer the allegations and ask them to provide the evidence they have for the charge. What I wouldn't do is keep silent, they're dreadful charges. Also I believe because this relates to kiddie porn (ffs) it would most definately be a criminal matter and not something dealt with by the council. I hate playing 'what if' :roll: I'm seriously concerned about what goes through your head at times. Of all the allegations that could have been made you choose 'kiddie porn'


Non attendance at the council hearing proves that you are guilty looking at kiddie porn. What more is there to add?

This is your world and not mine, why should I care? The burden of proof is upon you to prove your innocence. If you don't attend what do you expect?

You and Mr. T should be jumping up and down. This is the way you want it, is it not? :shock: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


I never said I didn't attend a council meeting (this isn't about you), there probably wouldn't be one cos the police would be dealing with the matter. I do know this and that is until my innocence is proven my licence would be suspended because of the nature of the complaint

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 12:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 10460
toots wrote:
Skull wrote:
toots wrote:
I guess I would get a solicitor and answer the allegations and ask them to provide the evidence they have for the charge. What I wouldn't do is keep silent, they're dreadful charges. Also I believe because this relates to kiddie porn (ffs) it would most definately be a criminal matter and not something dealt with by the council. I hate playing 'what if' :roll: I'm seriously concerned about what goes through your head at times. Of all the allegations that could have been made you choose 'kiddie porn'


Non attendance at the council hearing proves that you are guilty looking at kiddie porn. What more is there to add?

This is your world and not mine, why should I care? The burden of proof is upon you to prove your innocence. If you don't attend what do you expect?

You and Mr. T should be jumping up and down. This is the way you want it, is it not? :shock: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


I never said I didn't attend a council meeting (this isn't about you), there probably wouldn't be one cos the police would be dealing with the matter. I do know this and that is until my innocence is proven my licence would be suspended because of the nature of the complaint


However, you can't prove your innocence, Toots, what then? :-|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 12:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 10460
It looks like you and Mr. T have lost your licenses on an allegation alone. However, that's alright because you failed to attend the meeting to prove your innocence. Imagine, and you thought you were innocent until proven guilty.

What are you going to do now? :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 1:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
Skull wrote:
toots wrote:
I guess I would get a solicitor and answer the allegations and ask them to provide the evidence they have for the charge. What I wouldn't do is keep silent, they're dreadful charges. Also I believe because this relates to kiddie porn (ffs) it would most definately be a criminal matter and not something dealt with by the council. I hate playing 'what if' :roll: I'm seriously concerned about what goes through your head at times. Of all the allegations that could have been made you choose 'kiddie porn'


Non attendance at the council hearing proves that you are guilty for looking at kiddie porn. What more is there to add?

This is your world and not mine, why should I care? The burden of proof is upon you to prove your innocence. If you don't attend what do you expect?

You and Mr. T should be jumping up and down. This is the way you want it, is it not? :shock: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


You wouldn't be found guilty of looking at child pornographic pictures, what you would have been guilty of.. is non-compliance of your Licensing conditions.... which require you or me in most councils to be accountable for our actions, but obviously not in Skull's world .... now let's say that it was Skull's daughter that had made an allegation, saying that a driver had inappropriately touched her, obviously the driver should not be required to explain on a mere allegation..... :mrgreen:

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 1:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 10460
MR T wrote:
Skull wrote:
toots wrote:
I guess I would get a solicitor and answer the allegations and ask them to provide the evidence they have for the charge. What I wouldn't do is keep silent, they're dreadful charges. Also I believe because this relates to kiddie porn (ffs) it would most definately be a criminal matter and not something dealt with by the council. I hate playing 'what if' :roll: I'm seriously concerned about what goes through your head at times. Of all the allegations that could have been made you choose 'kiddie porn'


Non attendance at the council hearing proves that you are guilty for looking at kiddie porn. What more is there to add?

This is your world and not mine, why should I care? The burden of proof is upon you to prove your innocence. If you don't attend what do you expect?

You and Mr. T should be jumping up and down. This is the way you want it, is it not? :shock: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


You wouldn't be found guilty of looking at child pornographic pictures, what you would have been guilty of.. is non-compliance of your Licensing conditions.... which require you or me in most councils to be accountable for our actions, but obviously not in Skull's world .... now let's say that it was Skull's daughter that had made an allegation, saying that a driver had inappropriately touched her, obviously the driver should not be required to explain on a mere allegation..... :mrgreen:


You must be hurting big time to come away with that. I think I will let your scenario speak for itself.

I ask everyone else to make their own minds up by following the thread. Mr. T. is obviously not the man anyone thought he was. :-|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 1:18 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 1:58 pm
Posts: 2665
captain cab wrote:
Kinda proves how your mind works I guess.

CC


Please die.

Preferably soon.

And preferably incontinent and with all the indignity of long and lingering dementia.

Which we already know you have.



:lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 1:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
Skull wrote:
MR T wrote:
Skull wrote:
toots wrote:
I guess I would get a solicitor and answer the allegations and ask them to provide the evidence they have for the charge. What I wouldn't do is keep silent, they're dreadful charges. Also I believe because this relates to kiddie porn (ffs) it would most definately be a criminal matter and not something dealt with by the council. I hate playing 'what if' :roll: I'm seriously concerned about what goes through your head at times. Of all the allegations that could have been made you choose 'kiddie porn'


Non attendance at the council hearing proves that you are guilty for looking at kiddie porn. What more is there to add?

This is your world and not mine, why should I care? The burden of proof is upon you to prove your innocence. If you don't attend what do you expect?

You and Mr. T should be jumping up and down. This is the way you want it, is it not? :shock: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


You wouldn't be found guilty of looking at child pornographic pictures, what you would have been guilty of.. is non-compliance of your Licensing conditions.... which require you or me in most councils to be accountable for our actions, but obviously not in Skull's world .... now let's say that it was Skull's daughter that had made an allegation, saying that a driver had inappropriately touched her, obviously the driver should not be required to explain on a mere allegation..... :mrgreen:


You must be hurting big time to come away with that. I think I will let your scenario speak for itself.

I ask everyone else to make their own minds up by following the thread. Mr. T. is obviously not the man anyone thought he was. :-|
Your whole argument... is around the fact.... that you shouldn't be accountable just because of an allegation......

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 1:22 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 1:58 pm
Posts: 2665
toots wrote:
I guess I would get a solicitor and answer the allegations and ask them to provide the evidence they have for the charge. What I wouldn't do is keep silent, they're dreadful charges. Also I believe because this relates to kiddie porn (ffs) it would most definately be a criminal matter and not something dealt with by the council. I hate playing 'what if' :roll: I'm seriously concerned about what goes through your head at times. Of all the allegations that could have been made you choose 'kiddie porn'


What you don't get is that under the CGSA they don't have to provide evidene.

They are allowed to make any decision they see fit.

And, if they don't like you ....

What part of this don't you get.

Get with the programmne Toots. For God's sake thin k before you scribe.



:roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 1:28 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 1:58 pm
Posts: 2665
Jasbar wrote:
captain cab wrote:
Kinda proves how your mind works I guess.

CC


Please die.

Preferably soon.

And preferably incontinent and with all the indignity of long and lingering dementia.

Which we already know you have.



:lol:


Hey, if another Bird comes along and takes CC out, because this renowned "journalist" failed to help him, will I become a suspect in his demise?

How do you arrest someone gyrating uncontollably with a sudden outburst of ecstasy.

CC, your partner married a t*t.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 1:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 10460
toots wrote:
Skull wrote:
toots wrote:
I guess I would get a solicitor and answer the allegations and ask them to provide the evidence they have for the charge. What I wouldn't do is keep silent, they're dreadful charges. Also I believe because this relates to kiddie porn (ffs) it would most definately be a criminal matter and not something dealt with by the council. I hate playing 'what if' :roll: I'm seriously concerned about what goes through your head at times. Of all the allegations that could have been made you choose 'kiddie porn'


Non attendance at the council hearing proves that you are guilty looking at kiddie porn. What more is there to add?

This is your world and not mine, why should I care? The burden of proof is upon you to prove your innocence. If you don't attend what do you expect?

You and Mr. T should be jumping up and down. This is the way you want it, is it not? :shock: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


I never said I didn't attend a council meeting (this isn't about you), there probably wouldn't be one cos the police would be dealing with the matter. I do know this and that is until my innocence is proven my licence would be suspended because of the nature of the complaint


This must be the "guilt by default" you were speaking about in another thread. How does it feel? Guilty of looking at kiddie porn because you failed to prove your innocence. :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Allegation!!
PostPosted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 4:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 3:49 pm
Posts: 1331
Location: Midlands
Skull wrote:
Grandad, GBC or anyone else for that matter.

Let's say I walked passed you on the rank and you are reading a magazine. I then accuse you of having kiddie porn stuffed between the pages. The rank is covered by CCTV, and all this is caught on camera except for what you were looking at. A punter jumps in your taxi, and you drive off.

As a consequence of my allegation you are brought before the council committee to decide if you are fit to drive a taxi.

Fact, you are on the rank sitting in your vehicle. CCTV footage establishes you were there at the time and place.

Fact, you were looking at a magazine. We can see that from the CCTV footage also.

Fact, I walked passed and looked in your window and saw what you were looking at in the magazine. This too is captured on CCTV.

I've now established three facts, but you deny this serious allegation. You can't prove your innocence but I, nor the council can prove your guilt. The police can't find the kiddie porn anywhere.

In the interests of child safety should the council remove your licence, and how do they decide?

What credible evidence should they base their decision on?

That's assuming the burden of proof to prove your guilt is theirs and not yours to prove your innocence.

Oh and remember, there were no facts established in my case just a simple allegation.


Just when you thought he couldn't stoop any lower he's found another low. Go away and die Gary you scum bag.

_________________
Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
Image
Believe me, don't get Mercury X2


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Allegation!!
PostPosted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 5:03 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2008 10:56 pm
Posts: 201
Midlander wrote:
Just when you thought he couldn't stoop any lower he's found another low. Go away and die Gary you scum bag.


FFS Midlander...what the hell are you doing on TDO at this time?!! If you don't get some sleep...how the hell are you going to be awake early enough to get out and purchase those bloody shotgun cartridges??!!! :wink: :D


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 48 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 854 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group