Gateshead Angel wrote:
So what your saying is that this couldn't happen or that it doesn't mean 24hr drinking.
Bar A opens at 8am and closes at 6pm.
Bar B opens at 5:30pm and closes at 10:30pm.
Bar C opens at 8pm and closes at 2am.
Club 1 opens at 9pm and closes at 4am.
Club 2 opens at 10pm and closes at 6am.
Club 3 opens at 11:30pm and closes at 8am.
Thats only 6 establishments, even Gateshead has more than that.
What I was trying to say was that in theory 24-hour drinking could happen, but I don't think it will.
I don't think there's any great demand to stagger opening times, but what I had in mind was staggering closing times., but not by as much as per your examples, only an hour or two at most.
For example, if all clubs kick out at 2 at present, if some were open till 3, it wouldn't make much difference to the trade work wise or time wise, because at present chances are they would be still clearing the queues at the ranks by 3 anyway - so the demand for taxis would just be spread out a bit.
In the town I work in the past half the pubs closed at the same time and the other closed later. Taxi wise there were two mini-rushes just after each closing time.
But then most of the pubs decided to stay open till the later time, so the first mini-rush more or less disappeared, but the second mini-rush turned into not quite such a mini rush, but it didn't make any difference to drivers' working hours or whatever, all it did was change the pattern of demand.
I think a magnified version of that is what happens in the bigger towns and cities.
I think that all the pubs/clubs chucking out at the one time was one of the impetuses behing the licensing liberalisation, because the view seemed to be that the more idiots on the streets at once, the more likelihood of a kick off. Thus the aim seems to be to effectivley reverse what happened in my manor.
Of course, if all that happened was that all the clubs opened till 4 (say) then nothing would change except that the kick offs would happen later, and taxi drivers would have to work a couple of extra hours to make the same money, and would thus spend more time earlier in the night doing jack.
I think the Govt perhaps thought that if they liberalised things then demand would spread itself, for example by 4 few people would be in the clubs and most would have gone home anyway, but demand would have been spread out a bit more.
But it probalby wouldn't work like that - if the clubbers got an extra couple of hours then they would probably just come out a couple of hours later and go home a couple of hours later and the current mayhem would just happen a couple of hours later, which would please no one, and [edited by admin] off many others, such as taxi drivers, police and the public who have to endure it all.
But of course it's difficult to know what is going on, because the Govt and LAs have no more a clue about these things than they do about taxis.
For example, I think the main problem is not hours per se, but that police just sit around spectating until things kick off, and even if an idiot is apprehended by police the chances are all he'll get is a night in the cells, which won't bother him because he won't remember where he was anyway, and it's something to brag about to his mates - it was certainly like that when I was clubbing
