captain cab wrote:
Skull wrote:
Oh I see, is that blame or responsible for the Haiti earthquake, and its aftermath, directly or indirectly? I think you are taking things out of context and setting a pretext for your attack on Chomsky.
Quote the specific content written in the book that support you your claim.
I dont accept that. Take things out of contect....because reading through Mr chomsky....thats what he seems to do.
The guy was inferring something, its like me inferring the reason it was windy today was because of the battle of falkirk.....and i'll cite Michael Fish from his weather forecast in 1987 as saying.....'theres gonna be a little wind'.....but I wont quote fish.......I'll just cite him as number 37 and make someone else go out and buy the book.
But we've moved on.....can you tell me how the US mangaged to bomb pearl harbour....or was it still the japs? damn....i'll have to check my sources...who are dead and i dont have the book yet ffs.
CC
Chomsky's, opinions are based on reason, logic, circumstantial evidence, facts and sometimes prior conclusions drawn by others. Yes, he “infers” but then it's up to you to put forward your argument as to where he's got it wrong.
It's simply not good enough to disagree while failing to put forward your own argument.
