Taxi Driver Online

Your other problem is the court system and finding yourself in front of a strong Sheriff, and not just an establishment lackey.

I think you will win but there are other factors to consider.

If only it were that simple, depending on what case law has gone before you could find yourself trying to break new ground.

That’s what I’ve alluded to in my posts Skull. Maybe on this occassion, unlike cases in the past, the Council’s legal team are certain that they can deny the application.

its not just about not hearing me when they could have its more about the fact that by their own admission there data is flawed.
they must keep themselves informed as to demand with up to date current accurate demand information.
theirs is 12 to 18 months old biased and flawed and contains errors.and yet they denied presumably under sec 10.3.
thats a fettering of their discretion.
comet commercial was brought into the conversation on more than one occasion.
one councilor asked where my wife was,i replied she was at work,"we like to see our applicants",i replied "or there representatives as allowed under the terms of the act",she then asked if she intended to drive the vehicle.
at which point macleod interrupted and set her straight on the law.
these councilors are buffoons,i have to wonder if this is the sort of uninformed nonsense that goes on when large decisions are being made on our behalf,trams etc
imo if you sit on one of these committee's then you should inform yourself of all the legislation

i can assure you they are not at all certain
a man does not fumble about trying to explain himself constantly flipping pieces of paper over unless he's been found out.
macleod relied on the stupidity of the councilors to deny.

Christ id forgotten about her
that woman took money for leading her clients up to have them denied a complete moron.

I didnae' realise you were not told why you had been denied. Do they now send a letter out with the reason for denial ?

nach your practically thrown out once they've made a decision.

they never tell you why because the councilors don't know why they made the decision not legally at least.
to them they think its up to them period.
ill get the letter and it will be sec 10.3 as it can be anything else

that prat of a cab inspector shouted at me that the next meeting mr mackie was to be held in private and i should go i ignored the prat and loudly said its not on the b agenda and sat back down

Irrespective of how you feel about restriction, and trust me when I say this, you are dealing with incompetent ars*holes that are merely playing a game to fool the uninitiated. No self-respecting individual would have anything to do with that council.

Btw, ( No’ that anyone is intersted ) the suite lasted 6 weeks before some big fat barsteward burst the springs ! Aye, 2008 that wis’ a good year. 55k to buy in, and a 2k suite that lasted 6 weeks. Lucky white heather...

2k for a suite,you dealing drugs fae yer taxi

lol i thought you meant suit not suite
2k no that bad for somit to sit on
but for somit tae wear nae danger,i doubt ive spent htat in the last ten years on clothes

So who is this Scumbag Mackie? Cheeky barsteward objecting to your licence application.

recognise the face just some fat retard
he didnt have his lawer with him today as the bills almost crippled him he claimed.
maclead curtly told told him he should have got another lawyer
thats what you get when you go cap in hand raymond .

btw macleod thought he could deffer him another month(presumably to get rid of me).these stupid gets cant even work out that six months from 1 july is the 1st january he thought it was the 1st feb

Was Benny Hill music playing in the background when MacLeod was talking.