Taxi Driver Online

Again this is evidence of your paranoia, just because you can't work something out doesn't mean that it's a massive conspiracy.

You may think the silence is deafening Dusty, but neither my PM or my email inbox contains information as to where evidence should be forwarded.

I would also like to take this opportunity to state that some evidence has been provided, the banning of Nidge and MRT, the unfounded allegations that "someone" is writing something that another posts, are all contributing factors that this site and very possibly you in particular have something to hide.

I will clarify for anyone interested that I have agreed to send the information I'm fully aware of, to the administrators of this site, they have to date failed to supply it.

I would also say that allegations have been made on here, along with evidence relative to the membership of this site, I do not wish to dictate which side of the argument they should believe, if either, as I would much rather they made up their own minds.

So I reiterate, an allegation was made that a person had contacted local authorities using the name Taxi Driver Online, this person had claimed that information and opinion had been gathered from the membership of the site, all working taxidrivers, and the administrators had written a "paper" based on that information under the heading "Myth and Reality". Alongside this "paper" a list had been produced showing plate values in all restricted councils throughout the UK.
Along with this list and the Myth and Reality document, councils were also sent "mis-quoted" passages from both the OFT investigation and the DfT review.

Initially I had concerns that M&R would be used to express the views of the membership of this site, but at that time membership to the site was "open", and I knew from previous experience that councils questioned the credibility of such sites as they had no form of record on which to base their credentials. Then all of a sudden, about 9 months after the release of the M&R document the site decided to insist that in order to contribute registration was required and further "papers" were circulated.

At that time people who had shared my concerns started to notice other things, some from within their own area other from what they had been told. Some of these people decided to collate the varied information with the same name being mentioned time and time again.
This name was then published on this site, the post was deleted and the poster banned, subsequent posts mentioning the same name are still being automatically altered, with the question as to why remaining unanswered.

This evidence alone should be sufficiant at least to question the real intentions of the administration of this site, again I'm asking NO-ONE to believe me, all I ask is that you ask the questions.

The administrators of this site have admitted to contating councils, offering the M&R document and subsequently published lists, they claim however that they have NOT claimed to have published "on our behalf" but at best they imply that it was all compiled by us, even if the final document was written by them.

Who exactly are these people, does it matter that they are possibly using your details to promote what they believe is the way forward without your permission or knowledge, even if you disagree.

A number of prominant posters have reduced their contribution since this issue was raised, to the point that they still visit and read but do not actually post at all.

The admin want the evidence, they claim that it hasn't been offered but as I've said the evidence is contained within the pages of this website, if anyone cares to look.

B. Lucky

but as I've said the evidence is contained within the pages of this website, if anyone cares to look.

I've never read so much bullchit and lies in my life. You did the accusing azzhole, Now prove it and substantiate your lies, you incredulous moron.

JD

I've never read so much bullchit and lies in my life. You did the accusing azzhole, Now prove it and substantiate your lies, you incredulous moron.

JD

I notice how the sites main contributers have decided to stay quiet, MAYBE thats because they can see even the slightest truth in these accusations, by reacting in the way you have I would say you have just reinforced my point.

No GA, you made accusations, and you should withdraw then.

Maybe when the accusations are made fully, by those collating all of the relevant evidence, we will all know the FULL TRUTH.

Until that time Sussex I maintain my right as a member of this site to advice fellow members what I believe to be happening within it, now if you'd like me to stop doing that you could either tell everyone the full truth abouit you and your site, or you could ban me, or better still stop anyone from saying anything detrimental against either you or this website by censoring their opinions as well.

Perhaps they are waiting for you to front up with your imaginary evidence, as am I.

So are you going to back up the lies, or are you going to withdraw them?

Just for the record, how many of your posts (as the Angel, as CTPL, or anyone else you have been) have been deleted or censored?

aye, come on ga, giv us a clue man

captain cab

Nigel was sin binned because he acted like a grass, people deserve to keep their anonimity if they wish. It is not for you or Nigel to out anyone.

I have highlighted my concerns within this thread Sussex, as far as this site is concerned I believe the activities of the anonymous administration speak for themselves.

I have been consistantly misquoted.

Who is CTPL?